Research on the World-class Discipline Quality Evaluation Method Based on ESI

Zhang Weichong, Meng Hao
{"title":"Research on the World-class Discipline Quality Evaluation Method Based on ESI","authors":"Zhang Weichong, Meng Hao","doi":"10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": [Purpose /significance] “Double first-class” university construction focuses on disciplines. Exploring the first-class subject quality evaluation method is an important content of perfecting the first-class discipline evaluation system. [Method/process] This paper analyzed the key features of the sample group’s subject measurement by analyzing the ESI data of the world’s top 50 universities in the world, including the relationship between the numbers of papers and the growth, the relative ranking of disciplines, and the citation influence. This paper put forward the discipline “quartet method” from two dimensions: the contribution and the influence, with good discrete effects and reliability. [Result/conclusion] The discipline “quartet method” solves the problems of result homogenization in the world first-class discipline evaluation. It is shown that there are numerous super disciplines, whose amount is much larger that those of other countries, such as Germany, Japan, Australia, Canada, Switzerland, China, Singapore.","PeriodicalId":57452,"journal":{"name":"知识管理论坛","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"知识管理论坛","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: [Purpose /significance] “Double first-class” university construction focuses on disciplines. Exploring the first-class subject quality evaluation method is an important content of perfecting the first-class discipline evaluation system. [Method/process] This paper analyzed the key features of the sample group’s subject measurement by analyzing the ESI data of the world’s top 50 universities in the world, including the relationship between the numbers of papers and the growth, the relative ranking of disciplines, and the citation influence. This paper put forward the discipline “quartet method” from two dimensions: the contribution and the influence, with good discrete effects and reliability. [Result/conclusion] The discipline “quartet method” solves the problems of result homogenization in the world first-class discipline evaluation. It is shown that there are numerous super disciplines, whose amount is much larger that those of other countries, such as Germany, Japan, Australia, Canada, Switzerland, China, Singapore.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ESI的世界一流学科质量评价方法研究
【目的/意义】“双一流”大学建设以学科为核心。探索一流学科质量评价方法是完善一流学科质量评价体系的重要内容。【方法/流程】本文通过分析世界排名前50的大学ESI数据,分析样本组学科测量的关键特征,包括论文数量与增长的关系、学科相对排名、被引影响力等。本文从贡献和影响两个维度提出了学科“四重奏法”,具有良好的离散效果和可靠性。【结果/结论】学科“四重奏法”解决了世界一流学科评价结果同质化的问题。研究表明,中国有许多超级学科,其数量远远超过其他国家,如德国、日本、澳大利亚、加拿大、瑞士、中国、新加坡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
804
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foreign Government Social Media:Research Status, Hot Topics and Evolution Trend A Study on the Focus Preferences of Hot Netizens in Public Opinion on Weibo of Unexpected Public Events Meta-ethnography: A Qualitative Research Method of Effective Comprehensive Integration Technology Topic Mining and Trend Analysis from the Perspective of Industrial Chain Combined with K-Means and LDA——Taking Virtual Reality Technology as an Example Innovation Management of Enterprise Archives in the Context of Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1