Beyond the Hype: Robotic Process Automation's Public Perception Over Time

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10919392.2021.1911586
Ingo Kregel, Julian Koch, Ralf Plattfaut
{"title":"Beyond the Hype: Robotic Process Automation's Public Perception Over Time","authors":"Ingo Kregel, Julian Koch, Ralf Plattfaut","doi":"10.1080/10919392.2021.1911586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The perception of emerging technologies such as Robotic Process Automation (RPA) goes through the phases of emergence, growth, and maturity. In the emergence phase, potential users of the technology naturally have unrealistic expectations of high performance. The expected positive impact of the technology drives the subsequent growth phase. Later, these exaggerated expectations increasingly give way to realistic assessments until a maturity phase is reached. The current academic debate on RPA argues that there is also a fear narrative that hinders wider adoption of this technology. In this article, we present an analysis of over 95,000 news articles on RPA published between 2015 and September 2020 to study the public perception of RPA. We employ sentiment analysis and topic modeling to evaluate positive/negative and subjective/objective views as well as major topics identified in news media. Based on this analysis, we demonstrate that RPA can now be considered a mature technology which seems to have passed a hype without enduring a large dip in expectations. Building on these insights, this article discusses some potential avenues for future research “beyond the hype”.","PeriodicalId":54777,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","volume":"31 1","pages":"130 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10919392.2021.1911586","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2021.1911586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The perception of emerging technologies such as Robotic Process Automation (RPA) goes through the phases of emergence, growth, and maturity. In the emergence phase, potential users of the technology naturally have unrealistic expectations of high performance. The expected positive impact of the technology drives the subsequent growth phase. Later, these exaggerated expectations increasingly give way to realistic assessments until a maturity phase is reached. The current academic debate on RPA argues that there is also a fear narrative that hinders wider adoption of this technology. In this article, we present an analysis of over 95,000 news articles on RPA published between 2015 and September 2020 to study the public perception of RPA. We employ sentiment analysis and topic modeling to evaluate positive/negative and subjective/objective views as well as major topics identified in news media. Based on this analysis, we demonstrate that RPA can now be considered a mature technology which seems to have passed a hype without enduring a large dip in expectations. Building on these insights, this article discusses some potential avenues for future research “beyond the hype”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越炒作:机器人过程自动化的公众认知
对机器人过程自动化(RPA)等新兴技术的认知经历了出现、成长和成熟的阶段。在出现阶段,该技术的潜在用户自然会对高性能抱有不切实际的期望。预期的技术积极影响推动了随后的增长阶段。后来,这些夸大的期望逐渐让位于现实的评估,直到达到成熟阶段。目前关于RPA的学术辩论认为,还有一种恐惧的说法阻碍了这项技术的广泛采用。在本文中,我们分析了2015年至2020年9月期间发表的95,000多篇关于RPA的新闻文章,以研究公众对RPA的看法。我们使用情感分析和话题建模来评估积极/消极和主观/客观的观点以及新闻媒体中确定的主要话题。基于这一分析,我们证明RPA现在可以被认为是一种成熟的技术,它似乎已经通过了炒作,而没有承受期望的大幅下降。在这些见解的基础上,本文讨论了“超越炒作”的未来研究的一些潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
17.20%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (JOCEC) is to publish quality, fresh, and innovative work that will make a difference for future research and practice rather than focusing on well-established research areas. JOCEC publishes original research that explores the relationships between computer/communication technology and the design, operations, and performance of organizations. This includes implications of the technologies for organizational structure and dynamics, technological advances to keep pace with changes of organizations and their environments, emerging technological possibilities for improving organizational performance, and the many facets of electronic business. Theoretical, experimental, survey, and design science research are all welcome and might look at: • E-commerce • Collaborative commerce • Interorganizational systems • Enterprise systems • Supply chain technologies • Computer-supported cooperative work • Computer-aided coordination • Economics of organizational computing • Technologies for organizational learning • Behavioral aspects of organizational computing.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Mobile Payment Risk-Reduction Strategies: A Cross-Country Analysis Synthesizing Information Security Policy Compliance And Non-compliance: A Comprehensive Study And Unified Framework The Role of Secure Online Payments in Enabling the Development of E-Tailing Acceptance of Rpa in Public Sector Institutions Money at my Fingertips: Decoding the Role of Referent Network Size and Financial Knowledge in Reinforcing Continuance Intention of m-Payment Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1