EdD students’ identity development in a Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate program

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00021
R. Buss
{"title":"EdD students’ identity development in a Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate program","authors":"R. Buss","doi":"10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to describe how a Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate-guided EdD program has fostered the development of leadership and research skills and strong identities as learners, leaders and researching professionals (RPs) among its graduates. In doing so, the researchers explored students’ identities as learners, leaders and RPs and examined the development of those identities over a three-year period.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed method approach was used, including pre- and post-program surveys and interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed students enhanced or developed these identities over time. In particular, there was substantial growth and change in the “RP” identity as compared to development of the “learner” and “leader” identities.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe possible-selves theory and the provisional-selves framework (P/PS) were helpful in accounting for these changes as the program requirements fostered students’ efforts in elaborating and developing their identity roles. Further, examination of P/PS and their influence on identity development is warranted. For example, examining outcomes about more explicit use of P/PS and reflections on P/PS is warranted. See next section.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThere are implications for teaching of EdD students such as faculty members making more explicit the concept of P/PS during instruction and in the work required of students. Additionally, students could be required to engage in reflection on P/PS to make this process more concrete for them.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUsing P/PS provides a way to understand and foster processes underlying doctoral students’ identity development.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00021","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to describe how a Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate-guided EdD program has fostered the development of leadership and research skills and strong identities as learners, leaders and researching professionals (RPs) among its graduates. In doing so, the researchers explored students’ identities as learners, leaders and RPs and examined the development of those identities over a three-year period. Design/methodology/approach A mixed method approach was used, including pre- and post-program surveys and interviews. Findings The results showed students enhanced or developed these identities over time. In particular, there was substantial growth and change in the “RP” identity as compared to development of the “learner” and “leader” identities. Research limitations/implications The possible-selves theory and the provisional-selves framework (P/PS) were helpful in accounting for these changes as the program requirements fostered students’ efforts in elaborating and developing their identity roles. Further, examination of P/PS and their influence on identity development is warranted. For example, examining outcomes about more explicit use of P/PS and reflections on P/PS is warranted. See next section. Practical implications There are implications for teaching of EdD students such as faculty members making more explicit the concept of P/PS during instruction and in the work required of students. Additionally, students could be required to engage in reflection on P/PS to make this process more concrete for them. Originality/value Using P/PS provides a way to understand and foster processes underlying doctoral students’ identity development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡内基教育博士项目中EdD学生的身份发展
本文旨在描述卡内基教育博士项目如何在其毕业生中培养领导能力和研究技能,以及作为学习者、领导者和研究专业人员(rp)的强烈身份。在此过程中,研究人员探索了学生作为学习者、领导者和rp的身份,并在三年的时间里研究了这些身份的发展。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法,包括计划前和计划后的调查和访谈。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,学生们增强或发展了这些身份。特别是,与“学习者”和“领导者”身份的发展相比,“RP”身份有实质性的增长和变化。研究局限/启示可能自我理论和临时自我框架(P/PS)有助于解释这些变化,因为项目要求促进了学生在阐述和发展他们的身份角色方面的努力。此外,有必要检查P/PS及其对身份发展的影响。例如,检查关于更明确地使用P/PS和对P/PS的反思的结果是有必要的。参见下一节。实际意义对教育博士学生的教学有一些影响,例如教师在教学和学生的作业中更明确地说明P/PS的概念。此外,学生可以被要求对P/PS进行反思,使这个过程对他们来说更加具体。独创性/价值使用P/PS提供了一种理解和促进博士生身份发展的过程的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
How do Danish humanities PhD school leaders constitute their roles? Interactions of biography, place and time Advancing doctoral student professional development through a strengths-based cohort program Understanding how socio-historical contexts inform approaches to improving racial climate in stem graduate education within the United States Developing writing productivity in a graduate support community “We can work on this”: exploring supervisor approaches to feedback in the context of writing for a professional doctorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1