The Hierarchical Center in the Thought of St. Bonaventure

Q4 Arts and Humanities Franciscan Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-16 DOI:10.1353/FRC.2018.0005
Luke Togni
{"title":"The Hierarchical Center in the Thought of St. Bonaventure","authors":"Luke Togni","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2018.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between Bonaventure and Dionysius in scholarship is a little peculiar. Bonaventure’s use of hierarchy or other Dionysian tropes and concepts, together with his knowledge of Dionysius, is taken for granted but he is rarely analysed as a reader of Dionysius. Their ideas are compared while their texts, generally, are not. Since so many different Dionysii have been proffered in the last hundred years, from a duplicitous pagan holdout to a cryptic Constantinopolitan scholar to a liturgically-oriented Syrian monk, against just which one Bonaventure might be compared is practically a matter of taste. The profusion of Dionysii makes it all more necessary to crack open the Corpus Dionysiacum (hereon, CD) to measure Bonaventure’s dependence upon, recasting of, and divergence from the Areopagite. As a mid-thirteenth century, Paris-educated theologian, the CD Bonaventure knew was an assemblage of multiple translations, annotations, and commentaries, that is, Corpus Dionysiacum Parisiense (hereon, CDP) represented in the ms. BnF Lat. 17341.1 Besides that weighty","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"76 1","pages":"137 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2018.0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Franciscan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2018.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between Bonaventure and Dionysius in scholarship is a little peculiar. Bonaventure’s use of hierarchy or other Dionysian tropes and concepts, together with his knowledge of Dionysius, is taken for granted but he is rarely analysed as a reader of Dionysius. Their ideas are compared while their texts, generally, are not. Since so many different Dionysii have been proffered in the last hundred years, from a duplicitous pagan holdout to a cryptic Constantinopolitan scholar to a liturgically-oriented Syrian monk, against just which one Bonaventure might be compared is practically a matter of taste. The profusion of Dionysii makes it all more necessary to crack open the Corpus Dionysiacum (hereon, CD) to measure Bonaventure’s dependence upon, recasting of, and divergence from the Areopagite. As a mid-thirteenth century, Paris-educated theologian, the CD Bonaventure knew was an assemblage of multiple translations, annotations, and commentaries, that is, Corpus Dionysiacum Parisiense (hereon, CDP) represented in the ms. BnF Lat. 17341.1 Besides that weighty
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣博纳文图尔思想中的等级中心
博纳旺蒂尔和狄奥尼修斯在学术上的关系有点奇特。博纳旺蒂尔使用等级制度或其他酒神的比喻和概念,连同他对酒神的了解,被认为是理所当然的,但他很少作为酒神的读者来分析。他们的思想被比较,而他们的文本,一般来说,没有。因为在过去的一百年里,有这么多不同的酒神,从一个两面三刀的异教徒,到一个神秘的君士坦丁堡学者,再到一个以礼仪为取向的叙利亚僧侣,与博纳旺蒂尔相比,实际上是一个品味问题。酒神的丰富使我们更有必要打开《酒神文集》(以下简称CD)来衡量博纳旺蒂尔对《酒神文集》的依赖、重铸以及与《酒神文集》的分歧。作为一名13世纪中期在巴黎受过教育的神学家,博纳旺蒂尔知道CD是多种翻译、注释和注释的集合,即《巴黎酒神语料库》(以下简称CDP),收录在《巴黎酒神语料库》(17341.1)中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Franciscan Studies
Franciscan Studies Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guibert of Tournai's Letter to Lady Isabelle: An Introduction and English Translation John Punch's Hybrid Theory of Relations Editorial – A Word of Thanks Eric Doyle OFM: Hidden Architect of the Retrieval of the Franciscan Charism by Brenda Abbott (review) Communicating Conversion: Penitential Turn Transmission in the Early Franciscan Fraternity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1