Sociálně-právní dopady současného pojetí exekučního řízení pro obyvatele České republiky

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2023.6
Jitka Wolfová
{"title":"Sociálně-právní dopady současného pojetí exekučního řízení pro obyvatele České republiky","authors":"Jitka Wolfová","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last amendment to the Enforcement Code, which was introduced by the No. 286/2001 Sb., is an extensive amendment in its content. The aim of this amendment was mainly to solve the problem of multiple execution proceedings, an introduction of the principle of one mandatory single judicial officer. The amendment did not achieve its goal. It is unsystematic and chaotic. It increases the administrative duties of judicial officers and the overall increase in costs of the entire execution procedure, including the costs of entitled persons. The amendment lengthens and procedurally complicates the entire execution procedure not only for the judicial officer, but especially for the obligee and the beneficiary. It introduces positive changes to protect obligated persons who are socially weak, but in a complex and problematically applicable manner. The established legislative trend in the form of large debt amnesties for certain types of claims is a moral hazard for society.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The last amendment to the Enforcement Code, which was introduced by the No. 286/2001 Sb., is an extensive amendment in its content. The aim of this amendment was mainly to solve the problem of multiple execution proceedings, an introduction of the principle of one mandatory single judicial officer. The amendment did not achieve its goal. It is unsystematic and chaotic. It increases the administrative duties of judicial officers and the overall increase in costs of the entire execution procedure, including the costs of entitled persons. The amendment lengthens and procedurally complicates the entire execution procedure not only for the judicial officer, but especially for the obligee and the beneficiary. It introduces positive changes to protect obligated persons who are socially weak, but in a complex and problematically applicable manner. The established legislative trend in the form of large debt amnesties for certain types of claims is a moral hazard for society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现行强制执行程序概念对捷克共和国居民的社会和法律影响
《执行法》的最后一次修订是由第286/2001 Sb.引入的,在其内容上是一次广泛的修订。这一修正案的目的主要是为了解决多重执行程序的问题,引入一名强制性司法官员的原则。修正案没有达到它的目的。它是无系统和混乱的。它增加了司法官员的行政职责,增加了整个执行程序的费用,包括享有权利的人的费用。该修正案不仅对司法人员,而且对债权人和受益人而言,延长了整个执行程序并使其在程序上复杂化。它引入了积极的变化,以保护社会弱势的有义务的人,但以一种复杂和有问题的适用方式。对某些类型的债权实行大额债务赦免的立法趋势对社会是一种道德风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1