Empathy, quality of life and occupational burnout among medical students

Shoaleh Bigdeli, Seyed Kamran Soltani Arabshahi, Atefeh Zabihi Zazoly, A. Norouzi, Nahid Ahmadian Yazd, A. Hosseini
{"title":"Empathy, quality of life and occupational burnout among medical students","authors":"Shoaleh Bigdeli, Seyed Kamran Soltani Arabshahi, Atefeh Zabihi Zazoly, A. Norouzi, Nahid Ahmadian Yazd, A. Hosseini","doi":"10.34172/rdme.2021.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Empathy, quality of life, and occupational burnout are essential factors in medical sciences that affect the physicians’ and patients’ communication. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association of these three factors among medical students. Methods: This descriptive correlational study was conducted among medical internship students. Participants were selected by using simple random sampling. The Jefferson Empathy Questionnaire, the WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Maslach Burnout Questionnaire were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using t test, Kruskal-Wallis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 167 students completed the questionnaires. The association of empathy and occupational burnout (P=0.005, r=-0.414) and between the quality of life and occupational burnout (P=0.005, r=-0.446) were both significantly negative. Independent t test showed the mean score of occupational burnout was significantly higher in male students than females. It was also significantly higher in married students than single (P<0.05). The results of the KruskalWallis test showed no statistically significant difference among the quality of life of different ethnic groups (P>0.05). One-way ANOVA showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the ethnic groups in terms of occupational burnout (P<0.05) Conclusions: The association of empathy and quality of life with occupational burnout was negative. The highest quality of life was related to older students. Among all of the studied variables, married status, ethnicity, and sex were most associated with occupational burnout where married and male students had the highest burnout.","PeriodicalId":21087,"journal":{"name":"Research and Development in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Development in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2021.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Empathy, quality of life, and occupational burnout are essential factors in medical sciences that affect the physicians’ and patients’ communication. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association of these three factors among medical students. Methods: This descriptive correlational study was conducted among medical internship students. Participants were selected by using simple random sampling. The Jefferson Empathy Questionnaire, the WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Maslach Burnout Questionnaire were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using t test, Kruskal-Wallis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 167 students completed the questionnaires. The association of empathy and occupational burnout (P=0.005, r=-0.414) and between the quality of life and occupational burnout (P=0.005, r=-0.446) were both significantly negative. Independent t test showed the mean score of occupational burnout was significantly higher in male students than females. It was also significantly higher in married students than single (P<0.05). The results of the KruskalWallis test showed no statistically significant difference among the quality of life of different ethnic groups (P>0.05). One-way ANOVA showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the ethnic groups in terms of occupational burnout (P<0.05) Conclusions: The association of empathy and quality of life with occupational burnout was negative. The highest quality of life was related to older students. Among all of the studied variables, married status, ethnicity, and sex were most associated with occupational burnout where married and male students had the highest burnout.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生的移情、生活质量与职业倦怠
背景:共情、生活质量和职业倦怠是影响医患沟通的重要因素。因此,本研究的目的是探讨医学生这三个因素的相关性。方法:对医学实习学生进行描述性相关研究。采用简单随机抽样的方法选择参与者。采用Jefferson共情问卷、WHO生活质量问卷和Maslach职业倦怠问卷进行数据收集。数据分析采用t检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和Pearson相关系数。结果:共167名学生完成问卷调查。共情与职业倦怠呈显著负相关(P=0.005, r=-0.414),生活质量与职业倦怠呈显著负相关(P=0.005, r=-0.446)。独立t检验显示,男大学生职业倦怠平均得分显著高于女大学生。已婚学生明显高于单身学生(P0.05)。单因素方差分析结果显示,各民族在职业倦怠方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:共情、生活质量与职业倦怠呈负相关。年龄较大的学生的生活质量最高。在所有研究的变量中,婚姻状况、种族和性别与职业倦怠最相关,其中已婚和男性学生的职业倦怠最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of academic stress and scientific motivation in predicting research spirit among the students of medicalsciences The relationship between identity development and medical students’ performance in technology-integrated English language classrooms Challenges in the educational system of maxillofacial surgery residency training in Iran: Monodisciplinarity system or dual degree system? The use of social media (communication applications) in the training of medical students, especially oral and maxillofacial surgery residents in Iran Challenges and acceptance of e-teaching among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1