Mariucélio Santos Lima, Caio Querne De Carvalho, Lucas Matheus Padovese, L. A. Ferreira, R. S. D. O. Júnior, D. F. Biffe
{"title":"HERBICIDE SELECTIVITY IN PREEMERGENCE OF SWEET SORGHUM CULTIVATED IN DIFFERENT SOIL TEXTURE","authors":"Mariucélio Santos Lima, Caio Querne De Carvalho, Lucas Matheus Padovese, L. A. Ferreira, R. S. D. O. Júnior, D. F. Biffe","doi":"10.18512/rbms2020v19e1128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an interesting alternativefor biomass and ethanol production, however, so far there is very limited knowledge regarding selective herbicide options for weed control in this crop. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of preemergence herbicides for sweet sorghum. This research was composed by two steps: in the first one, a greenhouse screening was carried out with several herbicide treatments and in the following step the most selective treatments were evaluated on field conditions. In sandy clay loam texture soil, the treatments involving atrazine (1000 and 2000 g ha-1), amicarbazone (210 g ha-1), trifluralin (500 g ha-1) and flumioxazin (25 g ha-1) provided the greatest levels of selectivity to sweet sorghum. In clay soil (64.7% clay), the treatments with atrazine (1000, 1500 and 2000 g ha-1), amicarbazone (280 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (480 g ha-1), [atrazine + S-metolachlor] ([601+471,2 g ha-1), pendimethalin (500 g ha-1) and imazethapyr (42.4 and 63.6 g ha-1) provided the lowest levels of crop injury, and were considered as the most selective for sweet sorghum. Herbicide treatments applied to sandy clay loam soil provided more injuries to sweet sorghum than those applied to clay soil.","PeriodicalId":34859,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2020v19e1128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an interesting alternativefor biomass and ethanol production, however, so far there is very limited knowledge regarding selective herbicide options for weed control in this crop. The objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of preemergence herbicides for sweet sorghum. This research was composed by two steps: in the first one, a greenhouse screening was carried out with several herbicide treatments and in the following step the most selective treatments were evaluated on field conditions. In sandy clay loam texture soil, the treatments involving atrazine (1000 and 2000 g ha-1), amicarbazone (210 g ha-1), trifluralin (500 g ha-1) and flumioxazin (25 g ha-1) provided the greatest levels of selectivity to sweet sorghum. In clay soil (64.7% clay), the treatments with atrazine (1000, 1500 and 2000 g ha-1), amicarbazone (280 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (480 g ha-1), [atrazine + S-metolachlor] ([601+471,2 g ha-1), pendimethalin (500 g ha-1) and imazethapyr (42.4 and 63.6 g ha-1) provided the lowest levels of crop injury, and were considered as the most selective for sweet sorghum. Herbicide treatments applied to sandy clay loam soil provided more injuries to sweet sorghum than those applied to clay soil.
甜高粱(sorghum bicolor, L.)Moench)是生物质和乙醇生产的一个有趣的替代品,然而,到目前为止,关于这种作物的杂草控制的选择性除草剂选择的知识非常有限。本研究的目的是评价出苗期除草剂对甜高粱的选择性。本研究分为两个步骤:第一步,对几种除草剂处理进行温室筛选,然后在田间条件下对最具选择性的处理进行评价。在砂质粘土壤土中,阿特拉津(1000和2000 g hm -1)、氨基脲酮(210 g hm -1)、三氟灵(500 g hm -1)和氟恶嗪(25 g hm -1)处理对甜高粱的选择性最高。在粘土(64.7%粘土)土壤中,阿特拉津(1000、1500和2000 g ha-1)、氨基脲(280 g ha-1)、s -异甲草胺(480 g ha-1)、[阿特拉津+ s -异甲草胺]([601+471,2 g ha-1)、戊二甲基灵(500 g ha-1)和咪唑乙啶(42.4和63.6 g ha-1)处理对甜高粱的伤害最低,且选择性最强。砂质粘土壤土除草剂处理对甜高粱的危害大于粘土除草剂处理。