Short-term outcome of cataract surgery in tertiary hospitals

N. Mahmoud, Ibrahim Major, M. Mansour, Afaf H. Rashwan
{"title":"Short-term outcome of cataract surgery in tertiary hospitals","authors":"N. Mahmoud, Ibrahim Major, M. Mansour, Afaf H. Rashwan","doi":"10.4103/azmj.azmj_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim In this study we aimed to assess the short-term outcome of phacoemulsification in a tertiary hospital and to analyze which are the factors affecting visual outcomes. Patients and methods This is a prospective cohort study that included 50 eyes (50 patients) with senile cataract, phacoemulsification was done between September 2019 and December 2020. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination: preoperatively, first day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively was done. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure were compared. Double-angle plot of the corneal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated, including centroid values (C-SIA) and mean of surgically induced astigmatism (M-SIA). Results The mean age was 64.86±8.48 years, 60% right eyes. No intraoperative complications. Best-corrected visual acuity (log MAR) was 1.079±0.66 with significant improvement postoperatively (P=0.00). Mean intraocular pressure was 16.88±3.193 with significant decrease postoperatively (P=0.04). Corneal astigmatism significantly increased from 0.939±0.57 D preoperatively to 1.146±0.67 D postoperatively (P=0.02). The M-SIA was 0.65±0.32 D (OD), 0.55±0.31 D (OS), the centroid of surgically induced astigmatism C-SIA was 0.28±0.67 D at an axis of 68° (OD), and 0.15±0.72 D at an axis of 76° (OS). Good visual acuity (>20/40) was achieved in 80% and 20/20 in 22%, dense cataract significantly influences the visual outcome (P=0.02). Conclusions This study implicates that in the absence of ocular comorbidity, the visual outcome of phacoemulsification is satisfactory in short-term follow-up, and effort should be exerted during surgery to deal with ocular conditions requiring complex surgery such as dense cataract and to observe every postoperative visual progression for interventions.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"368 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_104_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim In this study we aimed to assess the short-term outcome of phacoemulsification in a tertiary hospital and to analyze which are the factors affecting visual outcomes. Patients and methods This is a prospective cohort study that included 50 eyes (50 patients) with senile cataract, phacoemulsification was done between September 2019 and December 2020. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination: preoperatively, first day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively was done. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure were compared. Double-angle plot of the corneal surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated, including centroid values (C-SIA) and mean of surgically induced astigmatism (M-SIA). Results The mean age was 64.86±8.48 years, 60% right eyes. No intraoperative complications. Best-corrected visual acuity (log MAR) was 1.079±0.66 with significant improvement postoperatively (P=0.00). Mean intraocular pressure was 16.88±3.193 with significant decrease postoperatively (P=0.04). Corneal astigmatism significantly increased from 0.939±0.57 D preoperatively to 1.146±0.67 D postoperatively (P=0.02). The M-SIA was 0.65±0.32 D (OD), 0.55±0.31 D (OS), the centroid of surgically induced astigmatism C-SIA was 0.28±0.67 D at an axis of 68° (OD), and 0.15±0.72 D at an axis of 76° (OS). Good visual acuity (>20/40) was achieved in 80% and 20/20 in 22%, dense cataract significantly influences the visual outcome (P=0.02). Conclusions This study implicates that in the absence of ocular comorbidity, the visual outcome of phacoemulsification is satisfactory in short-term follow-up, and effort should be exerted during surgery to deal with ocular conditions requiring complex surgery such as dense cataract and to observe every postoperative visual progression for interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级医院白内障手术的近期疗效
背景和目的在本研究中,我们旨在评估三级医院超声乳化术的短期效果,并分析影响视觉效果的因素。患者和方法这是一项前瞻性队列研究,包括50眼(50名患者)老年性白内障,超声乳化术于2019年9月至2020年12月进行。眼科综合检查:术前、术后第1天、1周、1个月进行检查。比较最佳矫正视力、角膜曲率和眼压的变化。计算角膜手术诱导散光(SIA)的双角图,包括质心值(C-SIA)和手术诱导散光平均值(M-SIA)。结果平均年龄64.86±8.48岁,60%为右眼。无术中并发症。最佳矫正视力(log MAR)为1.079±0.66,术后有显著改善(P=0.00)。平均眼压为16.88±3.193,术后显著下降(P=0.04)。角膜散光从术前的0.939±0.57D显著增加到术后的1.146±0.67D(P=0.02),手术诱导散光C-SIA的质心在68°(OD)轴处为0.28±0.67 D,在76°(OS)轴处则为0.15±0.72 D。80%和22%的患者获得了良好的视力(>20/40),致密性白内障对视觉效果有显著影响(P=0.02),在手术过程中应努力处理需要复杂手术的眼部疾病,如密集性白内障,并观察每一次术后视觉进展以进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conservative management versus ventilation tube insertion in children with otitis media with effusion accompanying cleft palate A study of the effect of some musical compositions on glucagon-like peptide 1, insulin, leptin, and body weight of crowded adult albino rats Protective role of Coenzyme Q10 on ultrastructure effect of sodium fluoride on the liver of adult male albino rats Comparative study between manipulation under anesthesia combined with local steroid injection versus local steroid injection alone in resistant cases of coccydynia Oral versus intravenous omeprazole in management of bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1