{"title":"Impact of community-based rehabilitation on quality of life and self-esteem of persons with physical disabilities and their family members","authors":"Joseph Umunnah , Babatunde Adegoke , Chigozie Uchenwoke , Chinonso Igwesi-Chidobe , Grace Alom","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a strategy by which persons living with disability (PWDs) access comprehensive rehabilitation services with limited evidence regarding its impact on the quality of life (QOL) and self-esteem (SE) of PWDs and their family members. This study compared the QOL and SE of Nigerian PWDs in communities with and without a CBR programme (CBR and non-CBR respectively), and the family quality of life (FQOL) of their family members.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study involving 2 604 PWDs (1 302 in CBR and 1 302 in non-CBR); 5 208 family members of PWDs (2 604 in CBR and 2 604 non-CBR), recruited from four randomly selected geo-political zones in Nigeria, purposive/consecutive selection of eight CBR programmes, PWDs and their family members (CBR and non-CBR). Outcomes assessed using Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument- short form (WHOQOL-BREF) and Beach Centre Family Quality of Life Instrument (BCFQOL). Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test and Spearman's rank order correlation were used to analyse data at <em>P</em> < 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PWDs in CBR scored higher in all domains of WHOQOL-BREF (<em>P</em> < 0.0001 in all cases) and RSES than non-CBR group (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). The CBR families scored significantly higher than non-CBR families in all domains (<em>P</em> < 0.05) except Emotional Well-Being of the BCFQOL. The CBR group scores on Psychological and Social Health domains of the WHOQOL-BREF showed significant positive correlation with CBR families’ Family Interaction (<em>P</em> = 0.06) and Parenting (<em>P</em> = 0.07) domains and total FQOL (<em>P</em> = 0.07).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Community-based rehabilitation positively impacted on SE and QOL of PWDs and their family members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644723000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a strategy by which persons living with disability (PWDs) access comprehensive rehabilitation services with limited evidence regarding its impact on the quality of life (QOL) and self-esteem (SE) of PWDs and their family members. This study compared the QOL and SE of Nigerian PWDs in communities with and without a CBR programme (CBR and non-CBR respectively), and the family quality of life (FQOL) of their family members.
Methods
Cross-sectional study involving 2 604 PWDs (1 302 in CBR and 1 302 in non-CBR); 5 208 family members of PWDs (2 604 in CBR and 2 604 non-CBR), recruited from four randomly selected geo-political zones in Nigeria, purposive/consecutive selection of eight CBR programmes, PWDs and their family members (CBR and non-CBR). Outcomes assessed using Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument- short form (WHOQOL-BREF) and Beach Centre Family Quality of Life Instrument (BCFQOL). Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's rank order correlation were used to analyse data at P < 0.05.
Results
PWDs in CBR scored higher in all domains of WHOQOL-BREF (P < 0.0001 in all cases) and RSES than non-CBR group (P < 0.0001). The CBR families scored significantly higher than non-CBR families in all domains (P < 0.05) except Emotional Well-Being of the BCFQOL. The CBR group scores on Psychological and Social Health domains of the WHOQOL-BREF showed significant positive correlation with CBR families’ Family Interaction (P = 0.06) and Parenting (P = 0.07) domains and total FQOL (P = 0.07).
Conclusion
Community-based rehabilitation positively impacted on SE and QOL of PWDs and their family members.