Then and Now: Vulnerable Workers, Industrial Action, and the Law in the 1970s and Today

Q2 Arts and Humanities Historical Studies in Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.3828/hsir.2020.41.12
A. Tuckman
{"title":"Then and Now: Vulnerable Workers, Industrial Action, and the Law in the 1970s and Today","authors":"A. Tuckman","doi":"10.3828/hsir.2020.41.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time when strikes are on the verge of disappearance, at least according to official figures, interest in them seems increasingly rare But at any hint of the spectre of industrial militancy, talk of unwarranted withdrawal of labour, mass picketing, and 'bringing the country to its knees' soon re-emerges Images are presented of men raising their hands at mass meetings in favour of a walkout;presented as 'a world to which we must not return' Labour's announcement in its 2019 election manifesto of plans to replace Conservative trade-union legislation was greeted by the Sun -reminding readers that it had first coined the label 'Winter of Discontent' in 1978 - as heralding 'a red riot … to paralyse Britain' 1 The Mail Online reported that John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, 'refused to rule out restoring the punishing secondary striking rights which crippled Britain's public services in the 1970s' 2 The Daily Telegraph has even asked if the COVID-19 pandemic might prove to be the winter of discontent for this generation 3 This review analyses three strikes - the origins of each dispute, their external support and the importance of picketing - and assesses the impact of trade-union legislation on industrial action © 2020 Liverpool University Press All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":36746,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","volume":"41 1","pages":"249-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/hsir.2020.41.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At a time when strikes are on the verge of disappearance, at least according to official figures, interest in them seems increasingly rare But at any hint of the spectre of industrial militancy, talk of unwarranted withdrawal of labour, mass picketing, and 'bringing the country to its knees' soon re-emerges Images are presented of men raising their hands at mass meetings in favour of a walkout;presented as 'a world to which we must not return' Labour's announcement in its 2019 election manifesto of plans to replace Conservative trade-union legislation was greeted by the Sun -reminding readers that it had first coined the label 'Winter of Discontent' in 1978 - as heralding 'a red riot … to paralyse Britain' 1 The Mail Online reported that John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, 'refused to rule out restoring the punishing secondary striking rights which crippled Britain's public services in the 1970s' 2 The Daily Telegraph has even asked if the COVID-19 pandemic might prove to be the winter of discontent for this generation 3 This review analyses three strikes - the origins of each dispute, their external support and the importance of picketing - and assesses the impact of trade-union legislation on industrial action © 2020 Liverpool University Press All rights reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当时和现在:20世纪70年代和今天的弱势工人、劳工行动和法律
至少根据官方数据,在罢工即将消失的时候,人们对罢工的兴趣似乎越来越少。但只要有任何迹象表明工业斗争的幽灵,关于毫无根据地撤出劳动力、大规模纠察和“让国家屈服”的言论很快就会再次出现。人们在群众会议上举手支持罢工的画面;工党在其2019年竞选宣言中宣布计划取代保守党工会立法,这一宣布被称为“我们绝不能回到的世界”,受到了《太阳报》的欢迎,提醒读者它在1978年首次创造了“不满之冬”的标签,预示着“一场红色暴乱……将使英国陷入瘫痪”1《每日邮报》报道称,影子财政大臣“拒绝排除恢复20世纪70年代破坏英国公共服务的惩罚性二次罢工权利”2《每日电讯报》甚至询问新冠肺炎疫情是否会成为这一代人不满的冬天3这篇评论分析了三次罢工-每一次争端的起源,他们的外部支持和纠察的重要性,并评估工会立法对劳工行动的影响©2020利物浦大学出版社版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
George Bain and Memories of the Bullock Committee on Industrial Democracy The British Printers’ 40-Hour-Week Strike of 1959: Background, Dispute, and Aftermath Canteen Workers’ Wages and Collective-Bargaining Arrangements in British Coal Undermining the ‘Polder Model’: Workers’ Militancy and Trade-Union Leadership in Four Dutch Wildcat Strikes, 1963–1970 Reflections on the Committee of Inquiry on Industrial Democracy, 1975–1977, Chaired by Alan Bullock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1