Children’s acquisition of negation in L1 Afrikaans

IF 1.2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS First Language Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1177/01427237221112064
M. White, F. Southwood, Kate Huddlestone
{"title":"Children’s acquisition of negation in L1 Afrikaans","authors":"M. White, F. Southwood, Kate Huddlestone","doi":"10.1177/01427237221112064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Afrikaans is a West Germanic language that originated in South Africa as a descendent of Dutch. It displays discontinuous sentential negation (SN), where negation is expressed by two phonologically identical negative particles that appear in two different positions in the sentence. The negation system is argued to be an innovation that came about through the reanalysis of a discourse-dependent (pragmatically conditioned) structure in Dutch, reinforced by proponents of the standardisation of Afrikaans who prescriptively imposed a negative concord structure onto the Dutch negation system. The Afrikaans negation system is therefore argued to be artificially created, making it crosslinguistically rare and syntactically complex, the latter possibly having a delaying effect on acquisition. This study investigates both the comprehension and production of negation by young child speakers of Afrikaans. Sentences containing negative indefinites (NIs) (niks ‘nothing’ and geen ‘no’/ ‘none’ with a final negative particle) are compared with those containing two negative particles (referred to as SN), which are syntactically less complex. We examined (1) whether the comprehension of sentences with NIs is more difficult to acquire than that of sentences using SN and (2) when and how negation is produced by young children. Data were collected through a picture selection task (comprehension) and recordings of spontaneous speech during free play (production). Results show that the comprehension of SN was acquired before that of NI, indicating that sentences containing NIs were indeed more difficult to comprehend than those containing SN. The production data showed that even the youngest participants (age 3;0) could produce grammatically well-formed negated constructions, but that errors occurred until age 4;3. In comparison with that found for other West Germanic languages, Afrikaans’ complex system of expressing negation seems to have a delaying effect on the comprehension of negation, specifically NIs, but not on production.","PeriodicalId":47254,"journal":{"name":"First Language","volume":"43 1","pages":"22 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221112064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Afrikaans is a West Germanic language that originated in South Africa as a descendent of Dutch. It displays discontinuous sentential negation (SN), where negation is expressed by two phonologically identical negative particles that appear in two different positions in the sentence. The negation system is argued to be an innovation that came about through the reanalysis of a discourse-dependent (pragmatically conditioned) structure in Dutch, reinforced by proponents of the standardisation of Afrikaans who prescriptively imposed a negative concord structure onto the Dutch negation system. The Afrikaans negation system is therefore argued to be artificially created, making it crosslinguistically rare and syntactically complex, the latter possibly having a delaying effect on acquisition. This study investigates both the comprehension and production of negation by young child speakers of Afrikaans. Sentences containing negative indefinites (NIs) (niks ‘nothing’ and geen ‘no’/ ‘none’ with a final negative particle) are compared with those containing two negative particles (referred to as SN), which are syntactically less complex. We examined (1) whether the comprehension of sentences with NIs is more difficult to acquire than that of sentences using SN and (2) when and how negation is produced by young children. Data were collected through a picture selection task (comprehension) and recordings of spontaneous speech during free play (production). Results show that the comprehension of SN was acquired before that of NI, indicating that sentences containing NIs were indeed more difficult to comprehend than those containing SN. The production data showed that even the youngest participants (age 3;0) could produce grammatically well-formed negated constructions, but that errors occurred until age 4;3. In comparison with that found for other West Germanic languages, Afrikaans’ complex system of expressing negation seems to have a delaying effect on the comprehension of negation, specifically NIs, but not on production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母语南非荷兰语中儿童否定的习得
南非荷兰语是一种西日耳曼语言,起源于南非,是荷兰语的后裔。它表现为不连续的句子否定(SN),否定由出现在句子中两个不同位置的两个语音上相同的否定助词来表达。否定系统被认为是一种创新,它是通过重新分析荷兰语中依赖于话语(语用条件)的结构而产生的,并得到了南非荷兰语标准化的支持者的加强,他们有规定地将否定和谐结构强加给荷兰语否定系统。因此,南非荷兰语否定系统被认为是人为创造的,使其在跨语言上罕见,在句法上复杂,后者可能对习得有延迟作用。本研究调查了讲南非荷兰语的幼儿对否定的理解和产生。将包含否定不确定性(NIs)的句子(niks‘nothing’和geen‘no’/‘none’带有最后的否定助词)与包含两个否定助词(称为SN)的句子进行比较,后者在语法上不那么复杂。我们研究了(1)带否定句的句子的理解是否比使用SN的句子更难获得;(2)幼儿何时以及如何产生否定。数据是通过图片选择任务(理解)和自由游戏(制作)期间自发语音的记录收集的。结果表明,SN的理解先于NI,这表明含有NI的句子确实比含有SN的句子更难理解。生产数据显示,即使是最年轻的参与者(3岁;0岁)也能产生语法形式良好的否定结构,但错误一直发生到4岁;3.与其他西日耳曼语言相比,南非荷兰语复杂的否定表达系统似乎对否定的理解有延迟作用,特别是否定,但对产生没有延迟作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
First Language
First Language Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: First Language is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in child language acquisition. Child language research is multidisciplinary and this is reflected in the contents of the journal: research from diverse theoretical and methodological traditions is welcome. Authors from a wide range of disciplines - including psychology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, neuroscience, communication, sociology and education - are regularly represented in our pages. Empirical papers range from individual case studies, through experiments, observational/ naturalistic, analyses of CHILDES corpora, to parental surveys.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Does the processing advantage of formulaic language persist in its nonadjacent forms? Evidence from Chinese collocation processing in children” Inflectional morphology and reading comprehension in low SES Arabic-speaking second graders Corrigendum to “Establishing Guidelines for MLU measurement in an agglutinating language: An illustration of Georgian” Development of derivational morphology in Kuwaiti Arabic-speaking children Book Review: Zarchy, R. M. & Geer, L. C., A family-centered signed language curriculum to support deaf children’s language acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1