Cross-listing and noncompliance with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation

IF 1.8 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Managerial Finance Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1108/ijmf-04-2022-0162
Satish Kumar, Geetanjali Singh
{"title":"Cross-listing and noncompliance with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation","authors":"Satish Kumar, Geetanjali Singh","doi":"10.1108/ijmf-04-2022-0162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn this paper, the authors examine the relation between cross-listing and the noncompliance with the mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) expenditure regulation in India, the first country to legally mandate the CSR expenditure.Design/methodology/approachThe authors apply panel logit and ordinary least square (OLS) regression models to examine the impact of cross-listing on the noncompliance with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation because panel regression has lesser multicollinearity problems and has the benefit of controlling for individual or time heterogeneity mostly present in cross-section or time series data.FindingsUsing a sample of 1,027 listed Indian firms, the authors show that the cross-listed firms are more likely to comply with the mandatory CSR expenditure than non-cross-listed firms. The authors further show that this relation holds only for those firms which are exposed to higher agency problems, for firms affiliated to business groups and for firms operating in high litigation risk industries. Finally, the authors show that cross-listed firms complying with the mandatory CSR expenditure command more valuation premiums.Practical implicationsThis study’s results suggest that the noncompliance of the Indian firms with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation comes down once they cross-list their shares in the US or the UK since such firms have to bond to the stronger corporate governance standards of the listed country. Hence, the authors recommend that merely making the investment in CSR activities mandatory may not serve the purpose and the convergence in corporate governance as well as compliance with the CSR expenditure can be achieved through cross-listing in US and UK markets.Originality/valueOne, the authors analyze the effect of cross-listing on the likelihood and magnitude of noncompliance with the CSR mandate. Two, this study is based in India where CSR expenditure has been made mandatory under the Companies Act, 2013. Using CSR mandate as a natural experiment, the authors have access to a richer data set on CSR in terms of the actual expenditure made by the company on CSR activities and the mandatory amount to be spent in a particular year.","PeriodicalId":51698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-04-2022-0162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, the authors examine the relation between cross-listing and the noncompliance with the mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) expenditure regulation in India, the first country to legally mandate the CSR expenditure.Design/methodology/approachThe authors apply panel logit and ordinary least square (OLS) regression models to examine the impact of cross-listing on the noncompliance with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation because panel regression has lesser multicollinearity problems and has the benefit of controlling for individual or time heterogeneity mostly present in cross-section or time series data.FindingsUsing a sample of 1,027 listed Indian firms, the authors show that the cross-listed firms are more likely to comply with the mandatory CSR expenditure than non-cross-listed firms. The authors further show that this relation holds only for those firms which are exposed to higher agency problems, for firms affiliated to business groups and for firms operating in high litigation risk industries. Finally, the authors show that cross-listed firms complying with the mandatory CSR expenditure command more valuation premiums.Practical implicationsThis study’s results suggest that the noncompliance of the Indian firms with the mandatory CSR expenditure regulation comes down once they cross-list their shares in the US or the UK since such firms have to bond to the stronger corporate governance standards of the listed country. Hence, the authors recommend that merely making the investment in CSR activities mandatory may not serve the purpose and the convergence in corporate governance as well as compliance with the CSR expenditure can be achieved through cross-listing in US and UK markets.Originality/valueOne, the authors analyze the effect of cross-listing on the likelihood and magnitude of noncompliance with the CSR mandate. Two, this study is based in India where CSR expenditure has been made mandatory under the Companies Act, 2013. Using CSR mandate as a natural experiment, the authors have access to a richer data set on CSR in terms of the actual expenditure made by the company on CSR activities and the mandatory amount to be spent in a particular year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉上市和不遵守强制性企业社会责任支出规定
印度是世界上第一个对企业社会责任支出进行法律强制规定的国家,本文考察了交叉上市与企业不遵守企业社会责任支出规定之间的关系。设计/方法/方法作者应用面板logit和普通最小二乘(OLS)回归模型来检查交叉上市对不遵守强制性企业社会责任支出规定的影响,因为面板回归具有较少的多重共线性问题,并且具有控制主要存在于横截面或时间序列数据中的个体或时间异质性的好处。通过对1027家印度上市公司的样本分析,作者发现交叉上市公司比非交叉上市公司更有可能遵守强制性的企业社会责任支出。作者进一步表明,这种关系仅适用于那些面临较高代理问题的公司、隶属于商业集团的公司和在高诉讼风险行业经营的公司。最后,研究表明,交叉上市公司遵守强制性企业社会责任支出要求的估值溢价更高。本研究的结果表明,一旦印度公司在美国或英国交叉上市,它们不遵守强制性企业社会责任支出规定的情况就会下降,因为这些公司必须遵守上市国家更强的公司治理标准。因此,作者建议,仅仅强制企业社会责任活动的投资可能无法达到目的,可以通过在美国和英国市场交叉上市来实现公司治理的趋同以及企业社会责任支出的合规。原创性/价值首先,作者分析了交叉上市对不遵守企业社会责任要求的可能性和程度的影响。第二,本研究基于印度,根据2013年《公司法》,企业社会责任支出已成为强制性的。将企业社会责任授权作为一项自然实验,作者可以获得更丰富的企业社会责任数据集,包括企业在企业社会责任活动上的实际支出和特定年份的强制性支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Treasury and Financial Risk Management ■Redefining, measuring and identifying new methods to manage risk for financing decisions ■The role, costs and benefits of insurance and hedging financing decisions ■The role of rating agencies in managerial decisions Investment and Financing Decision Making ■The uses and applications of forecasting to examine financing decisions measurement and comparisons of various financing options ■The public versus private financing decision ■The decision of where to be publicly traded - including comparisons of market structures and exchanges ■Short term versus long term portfolio management - choice of securities (debt vs equity, convertible vs non-convertible)
期刊最新文献
Examining the Indonesian dual banking system: an exploration of market discipline indicators CEO compensation and bank’s performance following bank-rescue Does corporate sustainability performance matter for cash holdings? International evidence Nonfinancial 8-K disclosures and individual investors' trading during earnings announcement window Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics: evidence from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1