R. Pleśniak, E. Karpińska, Marta Duczkowska, M. Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Entecavir and Tenofovir on Serum HBsAg Levels in Chronic HBe-Negative Hepatitis B Patients","authors":"R. Pleśniak, E. Karpińska, Marta Duczkowska, M. Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska","doi":"10.5812/hepatmon-118965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) was proposed as a helpful tool to monitor treatment efficacy with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) in HB e antigen-negative chronic HB. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the effect of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF) on qHBsAg kinetics and estimate the time necessary to achieve HBsAg clearance with each of these drugs. Methods: The study was conducted on 93 patients, 54 and 39 of whom were treated with ETV and TDF for a median time of 42 months, respectively. The qHBsAg was measured in 6-month intervals with the Elecsys HBsAg II Quantitative assay. The estimated time to undetectable HBsAg was calculated using the best-fitted curve analysis. Results: There was a significant decrease in qHBsAg titers in 79 (84.9%) patients with no difference between ETV and TDF groups (P = 0.754). The median quantitative HB drop was 2003 IU/mL (interquartile range: 638.1 - 5010). The HBsAg levels decreased by 40.3 ± 25.9% on average. The expected time required for HBsAg clearance was comparable in both groups, equaling 104 and 114 months for TDF and ETV, respectively. Conclusions: The HBsAg clearance can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients after additional 5 years of treatment with NA. The potency of TDF and ETV in qHBsAg reduction is similar.","PeriodicalId":12895,"journal":{"name":"Hepatitis Monthly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatitis Monthly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon-118965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) was proposed as a helpful tool to monitor treatment efficacy with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) in HB e antigen-negative chronic HB. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the effect of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF) on qHBsAg kinetics and estimate the time necessary to achieve HBsAg clearance with each of these drugs. Methods: The study was conducted on 93 patients, 54 and 39 of whom were treated with ETV and TDF for a median time of 42 months, respectively. The qHBsAg was measured in 6-month intervals with the Elecsys HBsAg II Quantitative assay. The estimated time to undetectable HBsAg was calculated using the best-fitted curve analysis. Results: There was a significant decrease in qHBsAg titers in 79 (84.9%) patients with no difference between ETV and TDF groups (P = 0.754). The median quantitative HB drop was 2003 IU/mL (interquartile range: 638.1 - 5010). The HBsAg levels decreased by 40.3 ± 25.9% on average. The expected time required for HBsAg clearance was comparable in both groups, equaling 104 and 114 months for TDF and ETV, respectively. Conclusions: The HBsAg clearance can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients after additional 5 years of treatment with NA. The potency of TDF and ETV in qHBsAg reduction is similar.
期刊介绍:
Hepatitis Monthly is a clinical journal which is informative to all practitioners like gastroenterologists, hepatologists and infectious disease specialists and internists. This authoritative clinical journal was founded by Professor Seyed-Moayed Alavian in 2002. The Journal context is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates and consensus statements of the clinical relevance of hepatological field especially liver diseases. In addition, consensus evidential reports not only highlight the new observations, original research, and results accompanied by innovative treatments and all the other relevant topics but also include highlighting disease mechanisms or important clinical observations and letters on articles published in the journal.