Online Conferences: Some History, Methods, and Benefits

IF 0.4 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC MUSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.7939/R3-Q6MQ-0004
Nick Byrd
{"title":"Online Conferences: Some History, Methods, and Benefits","authors":"Nick Byrd","doi":"10.7939/R3-Q6MQ-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers have probably been organizing conferences since at least the time of Plato’s academy. 1 More recently, philosophers have brought some of their conferences online. 2 However, the adoption of online conferences is limited. One might wonder if scholars prefer traditional conferences for their ability to provide goods that online conferences cannot. While this may be true, online conferences outshine traditional conferences in various ways, and at a significantly lower cost. By considering the costs and benefits of both conference models, we may find reasons to prefer online to traditional conferences in some circumstances. This paper shares the methods, quantitative results, and qualitative results of the Minds Online conferences of 2015, 2016, and 2017. The evidence suggests that the online conference model can help scholars better understand their profession, share the workload of conference organizing, increase representation for underrepresented groups, increase accessibility to attendees, decrease monetary costs for everyone involved, sustain conference activity during states of emergency, and reduce their carbon footprint. So, the advantages of traditional conferences might be outweighed by their higher costs after all.","PeriodicalId":45285,"journal":{"name":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3-Q6MQ-0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Philosophers have probably been organizing conferences since at least the time of Plato’s academy. 1 More recently, philosophers have brought some of their conferences online. 2 However, the adoption of online conferences is limited. One might wonder if scholars prefer traditional conferences for their ability to provide goods that online conferences cannot. While this may be true, online conferences outshine traditional conferences in various ways, and at a significantly lower cost. By considering the costs and benefits of both conference models, we may find reasons to prefer online to traditional conferences in some circumstances. This paper shares the methods, quantitative results, and qualitative results of the Minds Online conferences of 2015, 2016, and 2017. The evidence suggests that the online conference model can help scholars better understand their profession, share the workload of conference organizing, increase representation for underrepresented groups, increase accessibility to attendees, decrease monetary costs for everyone involved, sustain conference activity during states of emergency, and reduce their carbon footprint. So, the advantages of traditional conferences might be outweighed by their higher costs after all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线会议:一些历史、方法和好处
哲学家们可能至少从柏拉图的学院时代就开始组织会议了。最近,哲学家们把他们的一些会议放到了网上。然而,在线会议的采用是有限的。有人可能会问,学者们更喜欢传统会议,是因为它们能够提供在线会议无法提供的东西。虽然这可能是真的,但在线会议在很多方面都比传统会议好,而且成本也低得多。通过考虑两种会议模式的成本和收益,我们可能会找到在某些情况下更喜欢在线会议而不是传统会议的理由。本文分享了2015年、2016年和2017年Minds在线会议的方法、定量结果和定性结果。证据表明,在线会议模式可以帮助学者更好地了解他们的专业,分担会议组织的工作量,增加代表性不足群体的代表性,增加与会者的可及性,降低每个参与者的货币成本,在紧急状态下维持会议活动,并减少他们的碳足迹。因此,传统会议的优势可能最终会被其较高的成本所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Musical Quarterly, founded in 1915 by Oscar Sonneck, has long been cited as the premier scholarly musical journal in the United States. Over the years it has published the writings of many important composers and musicologists, including Aaron Copland, Arnold Schoenberg, Marc Blitzstein, Henry Cowell, and Camille Saint-Saens. The journal focuses on the merging areas in scholarship where much of the challenging new work in the study of music is being produced.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Mendelssohn’s “Late Style”: Form, Texture, and Sonority in the Final Chamber Works Neurophysiological correlates of gait initiation in individuals with Huntingtons and Parkinsons disease An Automatic Organ for the Pope: Mechanized Music and the Catholic Church in Twentieth-Century Italy Ferdinand Hiller’s Twelve Trips to Meet Old Friends in Heaven: A Little-Known Essay in Cultural Commentary from 1881
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1