Performances of Islamic and conventional equities during the global health crisis: Time‐frequency analysis of BRICS+T markets

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1002/rfe.1152
Edib Smolo, Rashed Jahangir, R. Nagayev, Christo S. C. Tarazi
{"title":"Performances of Islamic and conventional equities during the global health crisis: Time‐frequency analysis of BRICS+T markets","authors":"Edib Smolo, Rashed Jahangir, R. Nagayev, Christo S. C. Tarazi","doi":"10.1002/rfe.1152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the dynamic linkages and spillover effect between emerging economies (BRICS and Turkey), focusing on global crises, notably the COVID-19 pandemic. The study uses daily frequency data covering the period from 2002M5 to 2021M03. For the methodology, the paper employs Wavelet Coherence for multiresolution time-frequency analysis in addition to the frameworks of Diebold-Yilmaz Connectedness Index (DY12) and Barunik-Krehlik Frequency Connectedness Index (BK18). The empirical results reveal that the stock market comovements among sample markets are non-monotonous and depend on the time and frequency of returns. Significant correlations among the sample countries and a spike in overall spillover are also evident at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic or the Global Health Crisis (GHC). China, Brazil, Russia, and Turkey with all the other markets, experienced the weakest links during the GHC. Brazil, Russia, and South Africa act consistently (across different horizons) as net transmitters, whereas India, China, and Turkey perform as net receivers. Islamic equities are more likely to ?give? and less prone to ?receive? than conventional equities. Compared to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the GHC effect is more severe but short-lived. The findings of this study are helpful to policymakers and diverse investors when making portfolio diversification decisions.","PeriodicalId":51691,"journal":{"name":"Review of Financial Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic linkages and spillover effect between emerging economies (BRICS and Turkey), focusing on global crises, notably the COVID-19 pandemic. The study uses daily frequency data covering the period from 2002M5 to 2021M03. For the methodology, the paper employs Wavelet Coherence for multiresolution time-frequency analysis in addition to the frameworks of Diebold-Yilmaz Connectedness Index (DY12) and Barunik-Krehlik Frequency Connectedness Index (BK18). The empirical results reveal that the stock market comovements among sample markets are non-monotonous and depend on the time and frequency of returns. Significant correlations among the sample countries and a spike in overall spillover are also evident at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic or the Global Health Crisis (GHC). China, Brazil, Russia, and Turkey with all the other markets, experienced the weakest links during the GHC. Brazil, Russia, and South Africa act consistently (across different horizons) as net transmitters, whereas India, China, and Turkey perform as net receivers. Islamic equities are more likely to ?give? and less prone to ?receive? than conventional equities. Compared to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the GHC effect is more severe but short-lived. The findings of this study are helpful to policymakers and diverse investors when making portfolio diversification decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球健康危机期间伊斯兰和传统股票的表现:金砖国家+T市场的时频分析
本研究调查了新兴经济体(金砖国家和土耳其)之间的动态联系和溢出效应,重点关注全球危机,特别是2019冠状病毒病大流行。该研究使用了2002年至2003年期间的每日频率数据。在方法上,本文除了采用Diebold-Yilmaz连通性指数(DY12)和Barunik-Krehlik频率连通性指数(BK18)框架外,还采用小波相干进行多分辨率时频分析。实证结果表明,样本市场之间的股票市场变动具有非单调性,并依赖于收益的时间和频率。在2019冠状病毒病大流行或全球卫生危机爆发时,样本国家之间的显著相关性和总体溢出效应的激增也很明显。中国、巴西、俄罗斯、土耳其和其他所有市场,在GHC期间都经历了最薄弱的环节。巴西、俄罗斯和南非始终(跨越不同的视界)作为净发送者,而印度、中国和土耳其作为净接收者。伊斯兰国家的股票更有可能下跌。更不容易接受?比传统的股票。与全球金融危机(GFC)相比,GHC的影响更为严重,但持续时间较短。研究结果对决策者和多元化投资者进行投资组合多元化决策具有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Financial Economics
Review of Financial Economics BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The scope of the Review of Financial Economics (RFE) is broad. The RFE publishes original research in finance (e.g. corporate finance, investments, financial institutions and international finance) and economics (e.g. monetary theory, fiscal policy, and international economics). It specifically encourages submissions that apply economic principles to financial decision making. For example, while RFE will publish papers which study the behavior of security prices and those which provide analyses of monetary and fiscal policies, it will offer a special forum for articles which examine the impact of macroeconomic factors on the behavior of security prices.
期刊最新文献
Creating value through ESG: Assessing, measuring, and managing risks and opportunities Analyzing the energy markets and financial markets linkage: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda Stock return predictability and Taylor rules Tobin's Q and shareholder value: Does “shareholder return” impede investment? A rational finance explanation of the stock predictability puzzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1