Knowledge, attitude and adherence to standard precautions among frontline clinical physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION European Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1080/21679169.2021.2020898
C. Ezema, O. K. Onyeso, U. Okafor, Lance M Mabry, M. Adje, Jessica Shiraku, J. Brismée, Frédéric Froment, A. Stewart, O. Awosoga
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude and adherence to standard precautions among frontline clinical physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"C. Ezema, O. K. Onyeso, U. Okafor, Lance M Mabry, M. Adje, Jessica Shiraku, J. Brismée, Frédéric Froment, A. Stewart, O. Awosoga","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2021.2020898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose To investigate the knowledge of pathology and prevention of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), attitude towards clinical practice, and adherence to standard precautions among clinical physiotherapists during the pandemic. Material and methods A snowballing method was used to recruit physiotherapists (across 53 countries) who responded to a newly designed and validated survey on the participants’ demographics, knowledge of COVID-19, attitude, practices, and standard precaution adherence during the pandemic. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and ANOVA. Results All participants (n = 2550, 100%) were knowledgeable on COVID-19 symptomatology. However, only (n = 312, 12.2%) were actively involved in the management of confirmed cases. The percentage score of participants’ knowledge regarding COVID-19 pathology, and prevention, their attitude, and adherence to standard precautions averaged 77.73 ± 10.11, 89.70 ± 9.26, 77.44 ± 7.04, and 61.59 ± 16.63, respectively. Knowledge about COVID-19 pathology differed significantly across demographic variables (p < 0.001, Ƞ 2 ≤ 0.07). Most participants (n = 1936, 75.9%) reported an inadequate supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). Conclusion Participants had good knowledge of COVID-19 pathology and a positive attitude towards safe clinical practice. However, adherence to standard precautions was suboptimal due to inadequate infectious disease training and PPE supply.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"138 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2021.2020898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To investigate the knowledge of pathology and prevention of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), attitude towards clinical practice, and adherence to standard precautions among clinical physiotherapists during the pandemic. Material and methods A snowballing method was used to recruit physiotherapists (across 53 countries) who responded to a newly designed and validated survey on the participants’ demographics, knowledge of COVID-19, attitude, practices, and standard precaution adherence during the pandemic. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and ANOVA. Results All participants (n = 2550, 100%) were knowledgeable on COVID-19 symptomatology. However, only (n = 312, 12.2%) were actively involved in the management of confirmed cases. The percentage score of participants’ knowledge regarding COVID-19 pathology, and prevention, their attitude, and adherence to standard precautions averaged 77.73 ± 10.11, 89.70 ± 9.26, 77.44 ± 7.04, and 61.59 ± 16.63, respectively. Knowledge about COVID-19 pathology differed significantly across demographic variables (p < 0.001, Ƞ 2 ≤ 0.07). Most participants (n = 1936, 75.9%) reported an inadequate supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). Conclusion Participants had good knowledge of COVID-19 pathology and a positive attitude towards safe clinical practice. However, adherence to standard precautions was suboptimal due to inadequate infectious disease training and PPE supply.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间一线临床物理治疗师的知识、态度和对标准预防措施的依从性:一项横断面调查
摘要目的了解新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)流行期间临床物理治疗师对新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病理学和预防知识、对临床的态度以及对标准预防措施的依从性。材料和方法采用滚雪球法招募物理治疗师(来自53个国家),他们对一项新设计并经过验证的调查做出了回应,该调查涉及参与者的人口统计数据、对COVID-19的了解、态度、做法和大流行期间的标准预防依从性。数据分析采用描述性统计、Cronbach’s Alpha、Pearson’s相关和方差分析。结果所有参与者(n = 2550, 100%)均具备COVID-19症状学知识。然而,只有(n = 312, 12.2%)积极参与确诊病例的管理。参与者对新冠肺炎病理、预防知识、态度、遵守标准预防措施的平均百分比分别为77.73±10.11、89.70±9.26、77.44±7.04、61.59±16.63。不同人口统计学变量对COVID-19病理知识的了解差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001, Ƞ 2≤0.07)。大多数参与者(n = 1936, 75.9%)报告个人防护装备供应不足。结论参试者对新冠肺炎病理知识了解良好,对临床安全操作持积极态度。然而,由于传染病培训和个人防护装备供应不足,对标准预防措施的依从性不够理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey. Unravelling the digital competence of students in physiotherapy education through the European digital competence framework Complementary strategies to improve the qualitative analysis: exemplified by our studies of physiotherapy in shoulder problems Beyond one size fits All - Personalised prevention strategies using physical activity: editorial Comparing treadmill and overground versions of the two-minute walk test in people with low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1