Music and Deafness in the Nineteenth-Century U.S. Imagination

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC Journal of the Society for American Music Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1017/S1752196322000050
Anabel Maler
{"title":"Music and Deafness in the Nineteenth-Century U.S. Imagination","authors":"Anabel Maler","doi":"10.1017/S1752196322000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that deaf musical knowledge became epistemically excluded from systems of musical thought in the United States as the result of a battle between two competing philosophies of deaf education in the nineteenth century: manualism and oralism. It reveals how oralist educators explicitly framed music as exclusively involving “normal hearing”—and thus as outside of deaf knowledge except through technological intervention—by drawing on ideas about eugenics, race, and authenticity. Ideas about morality and technology also colored views of deaf musicality in the United States, shaping the reception of deaf music-making throughout the twentieth century until today. This article tells the story of how deaf music-making came to be forgotten and discovered, again and again, in the U.S. consciousness. By way of conclusion, I suggest that in order to address the epistemic exclusion of deaf musical knowers, we must carefully attend to what deaf epistemologies bring to music studies.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196322000050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that deaf musical knowledge became epistemically excluded from systems of musical thought in the United States as the result of a battle between two competing philosophies of deaf education in the nineteenth century: manualism and oralism. It reveals how oralist educators explicitly framed music as exclusively involving “normal hearing”—and thus as outside of deaf knowledge except through technological intervention—by drawing on ideas about eugenics, race, and authenticity. Ideas about morality and technology also colored views of deaf musicality in the United States, shaping the reception of deaf music-making throughout the twentieth century until today. This article tells the story of how deaf music-making came to be forgotten and discovered, again and again, in the U.S. consciousness. By way of conclusion, I suggest that in order to address the epistemic exclusion of deaf musical knowers, we must carefully attend to what deaf epistemologies bring to music studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪美国想象中的音乐与耳聋
摘要本文认为,由于19世纪两种相互竞争的聋人教育哲学:手工主义和口头主义之间的斗争,聋人音乐知识在认识论上被排除在美国的音乐思想体系之外。它揭示了口语教育者是如何明确地将音乐定义为只涉及“正常听力”的——因此,除了通过技术干预之外,它是聋人知识之外的——通过借鉴优生学、种族和真实性的思想。在美国,关于道德和技术的观念也影响了对聋人音乐的看法,塑造了整个20世纪直到今天对聋人音乐创作的接受。这篇文章讲述了聋人音乐创作是如何在美国人的意识中一次又一次地被遗忘和发现的。最后,我建议,为了解决聋人音乐认知者的认知排斥问题,我们必须仔细关注聋人认识论给音乐研究带来的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
Binational Indianism in James DeMars’s Guadalupe, Our Lady of the Roses Joshua McCarter Simpson's Songs and Mid-Nineteenth Century Antislavery Activism Opera and Land: Settler Colonialism and the Geopolitics of Music at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School Heitor Villa-Lobos and the Traces of Coloniality in Andrés Segovia's Guitar Repertoire Ry Cooder and Taj Mahal. Get on Board. Nonesuch/Warner Records, 2022, CD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1