Elimination Of Culture Based Discrimination Against Women In Indonesia:

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Indonesia Law Review Pub Date : 2019-04-30 DOI:10.15742/ILREV.V1N9.507
Widya Naseva Tuslian
{"title":"Elimination Of Culture Based Discrimination Against Women In Indonesia:","authors":"Widya Naseva Tuslian","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V1N9.507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of cultural relativism has always been fundamental challenge to upholding human rights values, especially with regard to gender mainstreaming and equality of either sexes. In this sense, there is a view that cross-cultural moral values are not acceptable given their own cultural traits that produce their own mode of thinking and ideology. It is thus understandable that article 5 (a) of women convention, which is the only provision in international law that seeks to modify culture that prejudice women, will deal with constant hurdles in countries which firmly embrace cultural values like in Indonesia. Even though a signal of commitment has been shown by a ratification without making any reservation to the obligations stipulated therein. However, this commitment remain highly questionable as discriminatory laws remain in force across the country from national to the local level and new discriminatory regulations continue to be issued. The Committee of Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) has reminded Indonesia at some occasion that the cultural and religious values cannot undermine the universality of women’s right. Nevertheless, up until now the authorities has always failed to make a clear time frame to make a revision of laws that institutionalize negative stereotype against women. Taking this perspective into account this paper will explore the reason and indicator of Indonesia’s failure to implement article 5(a) of the women convention to modify cultural values and stereotype against women in its legal system and instruments, in doing so this paper will also try to dig deeper about the barriers for Indonesia to implement its state obligations under this article.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V1N9.507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of cultural relativism has always been fundamental challenge to upholding human rights values, especially with regard to gender mainstreaming and equality of either sexes. In this sense, there is a view that cross-cultural moral values are not acceptable given their own cultural traits that produce their own mode of thinking and ideology. It is thus understandable that article 5 (a) of women convention, which is the only provision in international law that seeks to modify culture that prejudice women, will deal with constant hurdles in countries which firmly embrace cultural values like in Indonesia. Even though a signal of commitment has been shown by a ratification without making any reservation to the obligations stipulated therein. However, this commitment remain highly questionable as discriminatory laws remain in force across the country from national to the local level and new discriminatory regulations continue to be issued. The Committee of Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) has reminded Indonesia at some occasion that the cultural and religious values cannot undermine the universality of women’s right. Nevertheless, up until now the authorities has always failed to make a clear time frame to make a revision of laws that institutionalize negative stereotype against women. Taking this perspective into account this paper will explore the reason and indicator of Indonesia’s failure to implement article 5(a) of the women convention to modify cultural values and stereotype against women in its legal system and instruments, in doing so this paper will also try to dig deeper about the barriers for Indonesia to implement its state obligations under this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚消除基于文化的对妇女歧视:
文化相对主义的概念一直是维护人权价值观的根本挑战,特别是在性别主流化和两性平等方面。从这个意义上说,有一种观点认为,跨文化道德价值观是不可接受的,因为它们自身的文化特征产生了自己的思维模式和意识形态。因此,可以理解的是,《妇女公约》第5(a)条是国际法中唯一一条试图改变歧视妇女的文化的条款,它将在印度尼西亚等坚定信奉文化价值观的国家解决不断存在的障碍。尽管对其中规定的义务没有任何保留的批准表明了承诺的信号。然而,这一承诺仍然非常值得怀疑,因为歧视性法律在全国各地从国家到地方一级仍然有效,新的歧视性法规也在不断发布。消除对妇女歧视委员会曾在某些场合提醒印度尼西亚,文化和宗教价值观不能破坏妇女权利的普遍性。然而,到目前为止,当局一直未能制定明确的时间框架来修订将对妇女的负面刻板印象制度化的法律。考虑到这一观点,本文将探讨印度尼西亚未能执行《妇女公约》第5(a)条的原因和指标,以修改其法律体系和文书中对妇女的文化价值观和刻板印象,在这样做的过程中,本文还将试着深入挖掘印度尼西亚履行该条规定的国家义务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System Understanding the Role of Consent in Data Protection Regime: How Indonesia Can Learn From the GDPR Simple, Speedy, and Low Cost Trial : A Panacea For Corruption in Indonesia? THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EARTH OBSERVATION DATA IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: A CLOSER LOOK TOWARDS DATA IMAGING CRIMINISTRATIVE LAW: DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1