Failure Pressures of Dural Repairs in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model: Novel Use of Titanium Clips Versus Tissue Glue

IF 2.3 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2152656719879677
K. Chorath, Mason R Krysinski, L. Bunegin, Jacob S Majors, E. Weitzel, K. McMains, Philip G. Chen
{"title":"Failure Pressures of Dural Repairs in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model: Novel Use of Titanium Clips Versus Tissue Glue","authors":"K. Chorath, Mason R Krysinski, L. Bunegin, Jacob S Majors, E. Weitzel, K. McMains, Philip G. Chen","doi":"10.1177/2152656719879677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Endoscopic skull base surgery is advancing, and it is important to have reliable methods to repair the resulting defect. The objective of this study was to determine the failure pressures of 2 commonly used methods to repair large dural defects: collagen matrix underlay with fibrin glue and collagen matrix underlay with polyethylene glue, as well as a novel repair method: fascia lata with nonpenetrating titanium vascular clips. Methods The failure pressure of the 3 dural repairs was determined in a closed testing apparatus. Defects in porcine dura were created and collagen matrix grafts were used as an underlay followed by either fibrin glue (FG/CMG) or polyethylene glycol glue (PEG/CMG). A third condition using a segment of fascia lata was positioned flush with the edges of the dural defect and secured with titanium clips (TC/FL). Saline was infused to simulate increasing intracranial pressure (ICP) applied to the undersurface of the grafts until the repairs failed. Results The mean failure pressure of the PEG/CMG repair was 34.506 ± 14.822 cm H2O, FG/CMG was 12.413 ± 5.114 cm H2O, and TC/FL was 8.330 ± 3.483 cm H2O. There were statistically significant differences in mean failure pressures among the 3 repair methods. Conclusion In this ex vivo model comparing skull base repairs’ ability to withstand cerebrospinal fluid leak, the repairs that utilized PEG/CMG tolerated the greatest amount of pressure and was the only repair that exceeded normal physiologic ICP’s. Repair methods utilizing glues generally tolerated higher pressures compared to the novel repair using clips alone.","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2152656719879677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656719879677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Endoscopic skull base surgery is advancing, and it is important to have reliable methods to repair the resulting defect. The objective of this study was to determine the failure pressures of 2 commonly used methods to repair large dural defects: collagen matrix underlay with fibrin glue and collagen matrix underlay with polyethylene glue, as well as a novel repair method: fascia lata with nonpenetrating titanium vascular clips. Methods The failure pressure of the 3 dural repairs was determined in a closed testing apparatus. Defects in porcine dura were created and collagen matrix grafts were used as an underlay followed by either fibrin glue (FG/CMG) or polyethylene glycol glue (PEG/CMG). A third condition using a segment of fascia lata was positioned flush with the edges of the dural defect and secured with titanium clips (TC/FL). Saline was infused to simulate increasing intracranial pressure (ICP) applied to the undersurface of the grafts until the repairs failed. Results The mean failure pressure of the PEG/CMG repair was 34.506 ± 14.822 cm H2O, FG/CMG was 12.413 ± 5.114 cm H2O, and TC/FL was 8.330 ± 3.483 cm H2O. There were statistically significant differences in mean failure pressures among the 3 repair methods. Conclusion In this ex vivo model comparing skull base repairs’ ability to withstand cerebrospinal fluid leak, the repairs that utilized PEG/CMG tolerated the greatest amount of pressure and was the only repair that exceeded normal physiologic ICP’s. Repair methods utilizing glues generally tolerated higher pressures compared to the novel repair using clips alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猪离体模型硬脑膜修复的失败压力:钛夹与组织胶的新应用
目的内窥镜颅底手术技术不断发展,寻找可靠的方法修复术后缺损十分重要。本研究的目的是确定两种常用的修复大硬脑膜缺损的方法:纤维蛋白胶胶原基质衬底和聚乙烯胶胶原基质衬底的失效压力,以及一种新的修复方法:无穿透性钛血管夹阔筋膜。方法在封闭试验装置中测定3次硬脑膜修补的失效压力。在猪硬脑膜上建立缺损,用胶原基质移植作为衬底,再涂以纤维蛋白胶(FG/CMG)或聚乙二醇胶(PEG/CMG)。第三种情况是使用一段阔筋膜与硬脑膜缺损边缘平齐,并用钛夹(TC/FL)固定。注入生理盐水模拟移植物下表面颅内压(ICP)升高,直至修复失败。结果PEG/CMG修复的平均失效压力为34.506±14.822 cm H2O, FG/CMG平均失效压力为12.413±5.114 cm H2O, TC/FL平均失效压力为8.330±3.483 cm H2O。三种修复方式的平均失效压力差异有统计学意义。结论在体外模型中比较了颅底修复体承受脑脊液泄漏的能力,使用PEG/CMG的修复体承受的压力最大,是唯一超过正常生理颅内压的修复体。与单独使用夹子的新型修复方法相比,使用胶水的修复方法通常可以承受更高的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Allergy & Rhinology
Allergy & Rhinology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with COVID-19 in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Inverted Papilloma of the Middle Ear: Two New Cases and Systematic Review. Management Strategy of Intracranial Complications of Sinusitis: Our Experience and Review of the Literature. Serial Convalescent Plasma Infusions for the Initial COVID-19 Infections in the Appalachian Region of West Virginia. Long-term Outcomes Following Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Neurolysis for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1