Radical feminism and punk: visual cultures of affect and disruption

Na’ama Klorman-Eraqi
{"title":"Radical feminism and punk: visual cultures of affect and disruption","authors":"Na’ama Klorman-Eraqi","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2021.1877792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radical feminism and punk subculture were two communities in Britain in the 1970s which produced politically diverse cultural, visual, and photography practices. This paper explores, for the first time, the overlap between these two communities and how their political perspectives and enthralling disruptive visual strategies informed each other. I argue that punk, although resembling the dominant culture and other subcultures in their patriarchal aspects, provided a space for communicating feminist arguments and shared radical feminism’s disruptive strategies. My discussion examines punk artist Linder Sterling’s exploration of gender boundaries and sexuality in her feminist photomontages and her controversial punk performance. This argument is posited in relation to radical feminist street events, feminist photography, and punk aesthetics. Finally, I suggest that feminist and punk uses of photography, visual production, and performance were affective practices that engendered a political sense of community, identification, and mobilization.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":"14 1","pages":"357 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17540763.2021.1877792","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2021.1877792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radical feminism and punk subculture were two communities in Britain in the 1970s which produced politically diverse cultural, visual, and photography practices. This paper explores, for the first time, the overlap between these two communities and how their political perspectives and enthralling disruptive visual strategies informed each other. I argue that punk, although resembling the dominant culture and other subcultures in their patriarchal aspects, provided a space for communicating feminist arguments and shared radical feminism’s disruptive strategies. My discussion examines punk artist Linder Sterling’s exploration of gender boundaries and sexuality in her feminist photomontages and her controversial punk performance. This argument is posited in relation to radical feminist street events, feminist photography, and punk aesthetics. Finally, I suggest that feminist and punk uses of photography, visual production, and performance were affective practices that engendered a political sense of community, identification, and mobilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激进女权主义与朋克:情感与破坏的视觉文化
激进女权主义和朋克亚文化是20世纪70年代英国的两个群体,它们产生了政治上多元化的文化、视觉和摄影实践。本文首次探讨了这两个群体之间的重叠,以及他们的政治观点和迷人的破坏性视觉策略如何相互影响。我认为,朋克虽然在父权方面与主流文化和其他亚文化相似,但它提供了一个交流女权主义论点的空间,并分享了激进女权主义的破坏性策略。我的讨论探讨了朋克艺术家林德·斯特林在她的女权主义蒙太奇照片和她备受争议的朋克表演中对性别界限和性行为的探索。这一论点与激进女权主义街头事件、女权主义摄影和朋克美学有关。最后,我认为女权主义和朋克对摄影、视觉制作和表演的使用是产生社区、认同和动员的政治意识的有效实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Photographies
Photographies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
WHAT IF INDIANS INVENTED PHOTOGRAPHY? EYES AND WINGS: GRACIELA ITURBIDE’S BIRD IMAGES Plastic borders: on the photographic frame and its virtual experience LINES AND BETRAYALS: THE COLONIAL OCCUPATION OF THE KWANYAMA KINGDOM ON THE ANGOLA/NAMIBIA BORDER AND POSTMORTEM PHOTOGRAPHS OF MANDUME YA NDEMUFAYO (1917) DRIFT ALIGNMENT: ASTRONOMY, CELESTIAL NAVIGATION, AND THE US-MEXICO BORDER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1