A Comprehensive Comparison of COVID-19 Characteristics (Wuhan‎ Strain) Between Children and Adults During Initial Pandemic Phase: A Meta-Analysis Study

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-10-09 DOI:10.5812/pedinfect-119701
Ali Amanati, M. Vali, Hossein Fatemian, Z. Maleki, Hassan Foroozand, K. Sahebi, Mohammad Reza Rahmanian, Mohammad Javad Entezari Meybodi
{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparison of COVID-19 Characteristics (Wuhan‎ Strain) Between Children and Adults During Initial Pandemic Phase: A Meta-Analysis Study","authors":"Ali Amanati, M. Vali, Hossein Fatemian, Z. Maleki, Hassan Foroozand, K. Sahebi, Mohammad Reza Rahmanian, Mohammad Javad Entezari Meybodi","doi":"10.5812/pedinfect-119701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Wuhan strain) features in children and adults during the initial pandemic phase. Methods: Until June 4, 2020, a systematic search was conducted on the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus to find and collect studies based on available data among adults and children. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using I2 statistics and chi-square testing. The random-effect model was used to pool the effect sizes due to inter-study heterogeneity (chi-square P-value 0.1 and I2 >50%). Results: Fever (65.73%), cough (53.78%), expectoration (37.9%), gastrointestinal symptoms (37.01%), headache (23.41%), shortness of breath (21.65%), and myalgia (20.79%) were the most common symptoms reported in children, according to the pooled estimation analysis. Arthralgia (Effect estimate (ES): adults = 2.15, children = 17.94) and headache (ES: adults = 9.22, children = 23.41) were significantly observed higher in children (P-value = 0.019). Adult patients had a higher rate of abnormal computer tomography (CT)-scan findings, while most children had a normal study. Adults had significantly higher rates of comorbidities, whereas children had significantly higher rates of asthma (ES: 17.94% vs 8.85%; P-value = 0.026) and malignancy (‎ES: 10.36‎% vs ‎5.47‎‎%; P-value = 0.045‎). During initial pandemic phase, hydroxychloroquine (ES: 66.21% vs ‎‎29.01%; P-value = 0.001) and antibiotics (ES: 77.86% vs 38.01%; P-value = 0.001) ‎were used much more frequently in adult patients. Adults used much more antibiotics than children. Nonetheless, antibiotics were given to around 40% of the children studied. ‎ Conclusions: Although children were afflicted less than adults in the early stages of the pandemic and had lower mortality, clinical and radiological findings, as well as prognostic factors, did not differ significantly between adults and children. However, with the advent of novel variants, clinical signs and symptoms, complications, and outcomes changed in children significantly.","PeriodicalId":44261,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect-119701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Wuhan strain) features in children and adults during the initial pandemic phase. Methods: Until June 4, 2020, a systematic search was conducted on the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus to find and collect studies based on available data among adults and children. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using I2 statistics and chi-square testing. The random-effect model was used to pool the effect sizes due to inter-study heterogeneity (chi-square P-value 0.1 and I2 >50%). Results: Fever (65.73%), cough (53.78%), expectoration (37.9%), gastrointestinal symptoms (37.01%), headache (23.41%), shortness of breath (21.65%), and myalgia (20.79%) were the most common symptoms reported in children, according to the pooled estimation analysis. Arthralgia (Effect estimate (ES): adults = 2.15, children = 17.94) and headache (ES: adults = 9.22, children = 23.41) were significantly observed higher in children (P-value = 0.019). Adult patients had a higher rate of abnormal computer tomography (CT)-scan findings, while most children had a normal study. Adults had significantly higher rates of comorbidities, whereas children had significantly higher rates of asthma (ES: 17.94% vs 8.85%; P-value = 0.026) and malignancy (‎ES: 10.36‎% vs ‎5.47‎‎%; P-value = 0.045‎). During initial pandemic phase, hydroxychloroquine (ES: 66.21% vs ‎‎29.01%; P-value = 0.001) and antibiotics (ES: 77.86% vs 38.01%; P-value = 0.001) ‎were used much more frequently in adult patients. Adults used much more antibiotics than children. Nonetheless, antibiotics were given to around 40% of the children studied. ‎ Conclusions: Although children were afflicted less than adults in the early stages of the pandemic and had lower mortality, clinical and radiological findings, as well as prognostic factors, did not differ significantly between adults and children. However, with the advent of novel variants, clinical signs and symptoms, complications, and outcomes changed in children significantly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎特征的综合比较(武汉)‎ 流行病初期儿童和成人之间的紧张关系:一项荟萃分析研究
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)(武汉毒株)在大流行初期儿童和成人的特征。方法:直到2020年6月4日,在EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science、Google Scholar和Scopus上进行了系统搜索,以查找和收集基于成人和儿童可用数据的研究。使用I2统计和卡方检验来评估研究的异质性。由于研究间的异质性(卡方P值0.1,I2>50%),使用随机效应模型来汇集效应大小。结果:根据汇总估计分析,发烧(65.73%)、咳嗽(53.78%)、咳痰(37.9%)、胃肠道症状(37.01%)、头痛(23.41%)、呼吸急促(21.65%)和肌痛(20.79%)是儿童最常见的症状。儿童关节痛(效应估计值(ES):成人=2.15,儿童=17.94)和头痛(ES:成人=9.22,儿童=23.41)的发病率明显较高(P值=0.019)。成人患者的计算机断层扫描异常率较高,而大多数儿童的研究正常。成人的合并症发生率明显更高,而儿童的哮喘(ES:17.94%对8.85%;P值=0.026)和恶性肿瘤发生率显著更高(‎ES:10.36‎% vs‎5.47‎‎%; P值=0.045‎). 在疫情初期,羟氯喹(ES:66.21%vs‎‎29.01%;P值=0.001)和抗生素(ES:77.86%对38.01%;P值=0.000)‎在成年患者中使用频率高得多。成年人使用的抗生素比儿童多得多。尽管如此,大约40%的研究儿童服用了抗生素。‎ 结论:尽管在大流行的早期阶段,儿童的患病率低于成年人,死亡率也较低,但成人和儿童的临床和放射学结果以及预后因素没有显著差异。然而,随着新变种的出现,儿童的临床体征和症状、并发症和结果发生了显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Archives Of Pediatric Infectious Disease is a clinical journal which is informative to all practitioners like pediatric infectious disease specialists and internists. This authoritative clinical journal was founded by Professor Abdollah Karimi in 2012. The Journal context is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates and consensus statements of clinical relevance to pediatric disease field, especially infectious diseases. In addition, consensus evidential reports not only highlight the new observations, original research and results accompanied by innovative treatments and all the other relevant topics but also include highlighting disease mechanisms or important clinical observations and letters on articles published in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Bacterial Etiology and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile in Neonatal Sepsis Factors Affecting the Length of Hospital Stay in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study in Bam City, Iran A Survey of the Prevalence Rate and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Microbial Agents in Preterm Neonatal Sepsis Thyroid Function Test Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with COVID-19: A Case-Control Study Recurrent Fever and Abdominal Pain: Periodic Fever Syndrome, Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Patent Urachus; A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1