A. Anacleto, M. Morales, M. Teivelis, Marcelo Fiorelli Alexandrino da Silva, M. F. Portugal, C. Szlejf, Edson Amaro, N. Wolosker
{"title":"Epidemiological Analysis of 12 Years of Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Brazilian Public Health System","authors":"A. Anacleto, M. Morales, M. Teivelis, Marcelo Fiorelli Alexandrino da Silva, M. F. Portugal, C. Szlejf, Edson Amaro, N. Wolosker","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Although endovascular correction is a promising perspective, the gold-standard treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurisms and type-B dissections with visceral involvement remains open surgery, particularly due to its well-established long-term durability. This study aims to describe and evaluate public data from patients treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism in the Brazilian public health system in a 12-year interval. Methods Data from procedures performed between 2008 and 2019 were extracted from the national public database (Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde, or DATASUS) using web scraping techniques. Procedures were evaluated regarding the yearly frequency of elective or urgency surgeries, in-hospital mortality, and governmental costs. All tests were done with a level of significance P<0.05. Results A total of 812 procedures were analyzed. Of all surgeries, 67.98% were elective cases. There were 328 in-hospital deaths (mortality of 40.39%). In-hospital mortality was lower in elective procedures (26.92%) than in urgency procedures (46.74%) (P=0.008). Total governmental expenditure was $3.127.051,56 — an average of $3.774,22 for elective surgery and $3.791,93 for emergency surgery (P=0.999). Conclusion The proportion of urgency procedures is higher than that recommended by international literature. Mortality was higher for urgent admissions, although governmental costs were equal for elective and urgent procedures; specialized referral centers should be considered by health policy makers.","PeriodicalId":54481,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular","volume":"37 1","pages":"622 - 627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Introduction Although endovascular correction is a promising perspective, the gold-standard treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurisms and type-B dissections with visceral involvement remains open surgery, particularly due to its well-established long-term durability. This study aims to describe and evaluate public data from patients treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism in the Brazilian public health system in a 12-year interval. Methods Data from procedures performed between 2008 and 2019 were extracted from the national public database (Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde, or DATASUS) using web scraping techniques. Procedures were evaluated regarding the yearly frequency of elective or urgency surgeries, in-hospital mortality, and governmental costs. All tests were done with a level of significance P<0.05. Results A total of 812 procedures were analyzed. Of all surgeries, 67.98% were elective cases. There were 328 in-hospital deaths (mortality of 40.39%). In-hospital mortality was lower in elective procedures (26.92%) than in urgency procedures (46.74%) (P=0.008). Total governmental expenditure was $3.127.051,56 — an average of $3.774,22 for elective surgery and $3.791,93 for emergency surgery (P=0.999). Conclusion The proportion of urgency procedures is higher than that recommended by international literature. Mortality was higher for urgent admissions, although governmental costs were equal for elective and urgent procedures; specialized referral centers should be considered by health policy makers.
虽然血管内矫正是一个很有前途的前景,但胸腹主动脉瘤和b型夹层累及内脏的金标准治疗仍然是开放手术,特别是由于其建立的长期耐用性。本研究旨在描述和评估巴西公共卫生系统在12年内治疗胸腹主动脉瘤患者的公共数据。方法采用网络抓取技术从国家公共数据库(Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde,或DATASUS)中提取2008年至2019年的手术数据。评估了选择性或紧急手术的年度频率、住院死亡率和政府费用。所有检验均以P<0.05的显著性水平完成。结果共分析812例手术。67.98%为选择性手术。住院死亡328例(死亡率40.39%)。住院死亡率择期手术(26.92%)低于急诊手术(46.74%)(P=0.008)。政府总支出为3.127.051 56美元,其中择期手术平均为3.774 22美元,紧急手术平均为3.791 93美元(P=0.999)。结论急诊手术比例高于国际文献推荐。紧急住院的死亡率较高,尽管政府在选择性和紧急手术方面的费用相同;卫生政策制定者应考虑设立专门的转诊中心。
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (BJCVS) is the official journal of the Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (SBCCV). BJCVS is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal, with regular circulation since 1986.
BJCVS aims to record the scientific and innovation production in cardiovascular surgery and promote study, improvement and professional updating in the specialty. It has significant impact on cardiovascular surgery practice and related areas.