Highest Poverty or Lowest Poverty?: The Paradox of the Minorite Charism

Q4 Arts and Humanities Franciscan Studies Pub Date : 2017-11-17 DOI:10.1353/FRC.2017.0011
M. Cusato
{"title":"Highest Poverty or Lowest Poverty?: The Paradox of the Minorite Charism","authors":"M. Cusato","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2017.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversy over the meaning and parameters of Franciscan poverty is one of the most widely discussed issues in medieval historiography, both within the Franciscan order as well as outside of it, both during the Middle Ages as well as among contemporary scholars even today. Contemporary scholars—be they professed Franciscans or professional Franciscanists—have generally shown an interest in reconstructing the evolution of the friars’ practice of their poverty and the debates about this subject that were raging within the order among the friars themselves as well as between the order and their critics outside of it. These scholarly efforts have followed the trajectory of a more classically historical approach. They have been particularly intent on reconstructing and telling the story in all of its complexity and contentiousness. The emblematic scholarly work of this kind of historical approach still remains the masterly volume of Malcolm Lambert, titled Franciscan Poverty, written in 1961 and then slightly revised and expanded in 1998.2","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"275 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2017.0011","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Franciscan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2017.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The controversy over the meaning and parameters of Franciscan poverty is one of the most widely discussed issues in medieval historiography, both within the Franciscan order as well as outside of it, both during the Middle Ages as well as among contemporary scholars even today. Contemporary scholars—be they professed Franciscans or professional Franciscanists—have generally shown an interest in reconstructing the evolution of the friars’ practice of their poverty and the debates about this subject that were raging within the order among the friars themselves as well as between the order and their critics outside of it. These scholarly efforts have followed the trajectory of a more classically historical approach. They have been particularly intent on reconstructing and telling the story in all of its complexity and contentiousness. The emblematic scholarly work of this kind of historical approach still remains the masterly volume of Malcolm Lambert, titled Franciscan Poverty, written in 1961 and then slightly revised and expanded in 1998.2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最高贫困还是最低贫困?《少数派神恩的悖论》
关于方济各会贫困的意义和参数的争论是中世纪史学中讨论最广泛的问题之一,无论是在方济各会内部还是外部,无论是在中世纪,还是在当代学者之间,甚至今天。当代学者——无论是自称的方济各会修士还是专业的方济各会修士——普遍表现出对重建修士贫穷实践的演变,以及修士内部以及修士与其外部批评者之间关于这一主题的激烈辩论的兴趣。这些学术努力遵循了一种更经典的历史方法的轨迹。他们特别致力于重建和讲述这个故事的复杂性和争议性。这种历史研究方法的代表性学术著作仍然是马尔科姆·兰伯特(Malcolm Lambert)的巨著《方济会的贫困》(Franciscan Poverty),该书写于1961年,1998年稍作修订和扩充
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Franciscan Studies
Franciscan Studies Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guibert of Tournai's Letter to Lady Isabelle: An Introduction and English Translation John Punch's Hybrid Theory of Relations Editorial – A Word of Thanks Eric Doyle OFM: Hidden Architect of the Retrieval of the Franciscan Charism by Brenda Abbott (review) Communicating Conversion: Penitential Turn Transmission in the Early Franciscan Fraternity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1