The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
{"title":"The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of\n China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs","authors":"Wu Peng","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own\n argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a\n broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of\n China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons\n in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,\n distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese\n spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational\n maneuvering by being at the same time detached.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own
argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a
broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons
in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,
distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese
spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational
maneuvering by being at the same time detached.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.