Trying to Be All Things to All People: Alternative Development in Afghanistan

D. Mansfield
{"title":"Trying to Be All Things to All People: Alternative Development in Afghanistan","authors":"D. Mansfield","doi":"10.4000/poldev.3751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative development has had little success in Afghanistan. Understood and implemented as geographically bounded interventions designed to reduce drug crop cultivation, these projects failed to achieve their objectives throughout the 1990s. Since 2001, following the fall of the Taliban, unprecedented rises in levels of opium production, and an inflow of substantial amounts of aid, alternative development came to mean different things to different people in Afghanistan. To some, alternative development continued as short-term interventions designed to extract agreements from communities to reduce opium production, or reward those that had already done so. To others, it could be any development programme implemented in a poppy growing, or potential poppy growing, area often without any consideration of the causes of cultivation and how they differed by location, gender or socio-economic group. This chapter argues that a lack of consistency and clarity in approach—and in particular the failure to articulate and implement a strategy to support farmers transitioning to licit livelihoods within a changing framework of development assistance—confined alternative development and efforts to reduce poppy cultivation though rural development to the margins in Afghanistan. To quote Corinthians, in trying ‘to be all things to all people’, alternative development saved no one.","PeriodicalId":30371,"journal":{"name":"Revue Internationale de Politique de Developpement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Internationale de Politique de Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.3751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Alternative development has had little success in Afghanistan. Understood and implemented as geographically bounded interventions designed to reduce drug crop cultivation, these projects failed to achieve their objectives throughout the 1990s. Since 2001, following the fall of the Taliban, unprecedented rises in levels of opium production, and an inflow of substantial amounts of aid, alternative development came to mean different things to different people in Afghanistan. To some, alternative development continued as short-term interventions designed to extract agreements from communities to reduce opium production, or reward those that had already done so. To others, it could be any development programme implemented in a poppy growing, or potential poppy growing, area often without any consideration of the causes of cultivation and how they differed by location, gender or socio-economic group. This chapter argues that a lack of consistency and clarity in approach—and in particular the failure to articulate and implement a strategy to support farmers transitioning to licit livelihoods within a changing framework of development assistance—confined alternative development and efforts to reduce poppy cultivation though rural development to the margins in Afghanistan. To quote Corinthians, in trying ‘to be all things to all people’, alternative development saved no one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试图为所有人提供一切:阿富汗的另一种发展
替代发展在阿富汗几乎没有成功。这些项目被理解为旨在减少药物作物种植的地理上有限的干预措施,并在整个1990年代未能实现其目标。自2001年以来,随着塔利班的倒台,鸦片产量空前上升,以及大量援助的流入,替代发展对阿富汗不同的人来说意味着不同的东西。对一些人来说,替代发展继续作为短期干预措施,旨在促使社区同意减少鸦片生产,或奖励那些已经这样做的人。对其他人来说,它可能是在罂粟种植或潜在罂粟种植地区实施的任何发展方案,通常不考虑种植的原因以及它们如何因地点、性别或社会经济群体而不同。本章认为,方法缺乏一致性和明确性,特别是未能阐明和实施一项战略,以支持农民在不断变化的发展援助框架内过渡到合法生计,这限制了阿富汗的替代发展和通过农村发展减少罂粟种植的努力。引用科林蒂安的话说,在试图“为所有人做所有的事情”时,替代发展没有拯救任何人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Resistiendo frente a la extracción: desafíos para la creación de coaliciones entre los movimientos agrarios y antimineros Expanding Extractivisms: Extractivisms as Modes of Extraction Sustaining Imperial Modes of Living Regulación de la rehabilitación y el cierre de minas en tierras de propiedad indígena: Perspectivas de los Estados con recursos regulados de Australia y Canadá ‘We are nature defending itself’—The Forest of Dannenrod Occupation as an Example of Contested Extractivism in the Global North Les vies d’après de l’extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1