Nurses as essential members of an effective in-hospital cardiac resuscitation team

Tabitha L. Cumpian, B. Yasmeh, A. Jahangir
{"title":"Nurses as essential members of an effective in-hospital cardiac resuscitation team","authors":"Tabitha L. Cumpian, B. Yasmeh, A. Jahangir","doi":"10.21037/JHMHP-20-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. All rights reserved. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2020;4:17 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-20-18 In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), defined as loss of circulation prompting resuscitation with chest compressions, defibrillation, or both, is an increasingly common event affecting healthcare systems worldwide (1). The Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry, a large, prospective, hospital-based clinical registry, documented an average of 209,000 cases of IHCA each year in the United States between 2003 and 2007, with an increase to 292,000 per year between 2008 and 2017 (1,2). Survival rates for IHCA remain poor (3,4) with average survival rates of about 26% among 311 hospitals in the United States in 2017 (2). The rate of survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest varies among medical centers and is higher in hospitals with higher cardiac arrest volume, higher surgical volume, greater availability of invasive cardiac services, and more affluent catchment areas (2). Among those surviving to hospital discharge, 81.7% were considered to possess good functional status as evidenced by a cerebral performance category of 1 or 2 (2), representing mild or no neurologic disability to moderate neurologic disability (5). A significant difference in survival rates exists across hospitals in the United States, with survival rates ranging from 5.3–49.6% (3,6). This wide variation is present despite published guidelines by the American Heart Association (AHA) for the management of cardiac arrest. Even with guidelines in place, implementation of recommended procedures during IHCA has proved difficult as these events take place in varied environments with complex and diverse medical issues and require the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team to achieve successful outcomes. There are several factors involved and multiple steps are needed to ensure effective management of an IHCA patient. The initial step in the evaluation and treatment of IHCA requires timely identification of the cardiac arrest event and the underlying cause. When a cardiac arrest occurs, early appropriate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with quality chest compressions and thorough postresuscitation care are crucial to a positive outcome (1,5,7). In approximately 50–60% of cases, the underlying cause is cardiac in nature, whereas 15–40% are due to respiratory insufficiency (1) and appropriate care is needed for each of the underlying conditions and modifying factors to prevent deterioration that might lead to cardiac arrest. Development of a dedicated cardiac arrest or code team is essential. Top-performing hospitals are found to have dedicated or designated resuscitation teams with additional support staff (i.e., nursing, pharmacy, clerical, spiritual staff), clear patterns of communication between team members, and specific training and education around resuscitation (7). Although ample research has been performed regarding procedural techniques for the evaluation and management of IHCA, investigation into healthcare professionals’ roles, Editorial Commentary","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-20-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

© Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. All rights reserved. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2020;4:17 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-20-18 In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), defined as loss of circulation prompting resuscitation with chest compressions, defibrillation, or both, is an increasingly common event affecting healthcare systems worldwide (1). The Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry, a large, prospective, hospital-based clinical registry, documented an average of 209,000 cases of IHCA each year in the United States between 2003 and 2007, with an increase to 292,000 per year between 2008 and 2017 (1,2). Survival rates for IHCA remain poor (3,4) with average survival rates of about 26% among 311 hospitals in the United States in 2017 (2). The rate of survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest varies among medical centers and is higher in hospitals with higher cardiac arrest volume, higher surgical volume, greater availability of invasive cardiac services, and more affluent catchment areas (2). Among those surviving to hospital discharge, 81.7% were considered to possess good functional status as evidenced by a cerebral performance category of 1 or 2 (2), representing mild or no neurologic disability to moderate neurologic disability (5). A significant difference in survival rates exists across hospitals in the United States, with survival rates ranging from 5.3–49.6% (3,6). This wide variation is present despite published guidelines by the American Heart Association (AHA) for the management of cardiac arrest. Even with guidelines in place, implementation of recommended procedures during IHCA has proved difficult as these events take place in varied environments with complex and diverse medical issues and require the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team to achieve successful outcomes. There are several factors involved and multiple steps are needed to ensure effective management of an IHCA patient. The initial step in the evaluation and treatment of IHCA requires timely identification of the cardiac arrest event and the underlying cause. When a cardiac arrest occurs, early appropriate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with quality chest compressions and thorough postresuscitation care are crucial to a positive outcome (1,5,7). In approximately 50–60% of cases, the underlying cause is cardiac in nature, whereas 15–40% are due to respiratory insufficiency (1) and appropriate care is needed for each of the underlying conditions and modifying factors to prevent deterioration that might lead to cardiac arrest. Development of a dedicated cardiac arrest or code team is essential. Top-performing hospitals are found to have dedicated or designated resuscitation teams with additional support staff (i.e., nursing, pharmacy, clerical, spiritual staff), clear patterns of communication between team members, and specific training and education around resuscitation (7). Although ample research has been performed regarding procedural techniques for the evaluation and management of IHCA, investigation into healthcare professionals’ roles, Editorial Commentary
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士是有效的院内心脏复苏团队的重要成员
©医院管理与卫生政策杂志。版权所有。医院内心脏骤停(IHCA),定义为循环丧失,需要通过胸外按压、除颤或两者同时进行复苏,是影响全球医疗保健系统的日益常见的事件(1)。2003年至2007年期间,美国每年平均记录209,000例IHCA病例,2008年至2017年期间每年增加到292,000例(1,2)。IHCA的存活率仍然很低(3,4),2017年美国311家医院的平均存活率约为26%(2)。心脏骤停后出院的存活率因医疗中心而异,在心脏骤停量大、手术量大、有创心脏服务可及性更高、集水区更富裕的医院中更高(2)。81.7%的患者被认为具有良好的功能状态,脑功能分类为1或2(2),代表轻度或无神经功能残疾到中度神经功能残疾(5)。美国各医院的生存率存在显著差异,生存率从5.3-49.6%不等(3,6)。尽管美国心脏协会(AHA)发布了心脏骤停管理指南,但仍存在这种广泛的差异。即使有了指导方针,在国际医疗保健合作期间实施所建议的程序也被证明是困难的,因为这些事件发生在具有复杂和多样化医疗问题的各种环境中,需要多学科团队的合作才能取得成功的结果。这涉及到几个因素,需要采取多个步骤来确保对IHCA患者的有效管理。评估和治疗IHCA的第一步需要及时识别心脏骤停事件及其根本原因。当心脏骤停发生时,早期适当的心肺复苏(CPR),高质量的胸部按压和彻底的复苏后护理对于取得积极的结果至关重要(1,5,7)。在大约50-60%的病例中,潜在原因本质上是心脏原因,而15-40%是由于呼吸功能不全(1),需要对每种潜在条件和调节因素进行适当的护理,以防止可能导致心脏骤停的恶化。建立一个专门的心脏骤停或代码团队是必不可少的。研究发现,表现最好的医院拥有专门或指定的复苏团队,并配备额外的支持人员(即护理人员、药房人员、文员、精神工作人员),团队成员之间有明确的沟通模式,以及围绕复苏的具体培训和教育(7)。尽管已经对评估和管理IHCA的程序技术进行了充分的研究,对医疗保健专业人员的角色进行了调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1