Was there a transformation in economic ideology between 1960 and 2000?

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Political Economy Pub Date : 2019-05-04 DOI:10.1080/07078552.2019.1646453
A. Das, Ian Hudson, M. Hudson
{"title":"Was there a transformation in economic ideology between 1960 and 2000?","authors":"A. Das, Ian Hudson, M. Hudson","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2019.1646453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we examine whether or not there has been a change in economic ideology in the late twentieth century. To conduct the analysis, we first identified the most influential economists, as determined by citation analysis. Next, we divided the database into four decades (1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s) and ranked the authors according to their citation counts. We examined the articles and classified each of the top 50- and top 10-cited authors, by both definitions, as “free market,” “interventionist,” or “methodological.” We argue that the economics profession has produced more research that draws pro-free-market conclusions over the last four decades of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"100 1","pages":"150 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07078552.2019.1646453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2019.1646453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine whether or not there has been a change in economic ideology in the late twentieth century. To conduct the analysis, we first identified the most influential economists, as determined by citation analysis. Next, we divided the database into four decades (1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s) and ranked the authors according to their citation counts. We examined the articles and classified each of the top 50- and top 10-cited authors, by both definitions, as “free market,” “interventionist,” or “methodological.” We argue that the economics profession has produced more research that draws pro-free-market conclusions over the last four decades of the twentieth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1960年至2000年间,经济意识形态发生了转变吗?
摘要在本文中,我们考察了20世纪末经济意识形态是否发生了变化。为了进行分析,我们首先通过引文分析确定了最具影响力的经济学家。接下来,我们将数据库分为40年(20世纪60年代、70年代、80年代和90年代),并根据引用次数对作者进行排名。我们研究了这些文章,并根据这两种定义,将前50名和前10名被引用的作者分别归类为“自由市场”、“干预主义者”或“方法论者”。我们认为,在20世纪的最后40年里,经济学界进行了更多的研究,得出了支持自由市场的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—concepts of class Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—the climate, public power, and the means of social reproduction Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—proletarian ecology, environmental provision, and the welfare of children as a public good Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—staying in the ring Critical engagements with “Climate Change as Class War”—towards a politics of better
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1