Exposure to green space and prevention of anxiety and depression among young people in urban settings: a global scoping review

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-05-28 DOI:10.1108/JPMH-02-2021-0030
Rebecca Reece, I. Bray, D. Sinnett, R. Hayward, F. Martin
{"title":"Exposure to green space and prevention of anxiety and depression among young people in urban settings: a global scoping review","authors":"Rebecca Reece, I. Bray, D. Sinnett, R. Hayward, F. Martin","doi":"10.1108/JPMH-02-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is a mental health crisis, particularly among young people. Despite many young people living in urban settings, reviews about the association between exposure to green or natural environments and mental health tend to focus on either children or adults. The aim of this review is to examine the scope of the global literature for this age group, to inform a systematic review on the role of exposure to green space in preventing anxiety and depression amongst young people aged 14–24 years.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSeven databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative sources published from January 2000 to June 2020. This identified 201 sources and their characteristics are described here. Gaps in the literature are also highlighted.\n\n\nFindings\nThe number of relevant studies published per year has increased over time. Most studies are set in North America (28%) or Europe (39%). The most common study designs were observational (34%) or experimental (28%). A wide range of exposures and interventions are described.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis review included literature from predominantly high-income countries and has shown the under-representation of low-middle income countries and lack of ethnic diversity in study populations. It has also highlighted the lack of clinical measures of anxiety and depression as outcomes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis inter-disciplinary review has contributed to the field by describing the geographic distribution of the literature and the broad range of exposures to green spaces being reported. Unlike previous scoping reviews, this review focused specifically on young people and on measures of anxiety and depression and their pre-cursers.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-02-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose There is a mental health crisis, particularly among young people. Despite many young people living in urban settings, reviews about the association between exposure to green or natural environments and mental health tend to focus on either children or adults. The aim of this review is to examine the scope of the global literature for this age group, to inform a systematic review on the role of exposure to green space in preventing anxiety and depression amongst young people aged 14–24 years. Design/methodology/approach Seven databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative sources published from January 2000 to June 2020. This identified 201 sources and their characteristics are described here. Gaps in the literature are also highlighted. Findings The number of relevant studies published per year has increased over time. Most studies are set in North America (28%) or Europe (39%). The most common study designs were observational (34%) or experimental (28%). A wide range of exposures and interventions are described. Research limitations/implications This review included literature from predominantly high-income countries and has shown the under-representation of low-middle income countries and lack of ethnic diversity in study populations. It has also highlighted the lack of clinical measures of anxiety and depression as outcomes. Originality/value This inter-disciplinary review has contributed to the field by describing the geographic distribution of the literature and the broad range of exposures to green spaces being reported. Unlike previous scoping reviews, this review focused specifically on young people and on measures of anxiety and depression and their pre-cursers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市环境中年轻人接触绿地与预防焦虑和抑郁:一项全球范围界定综述
目的存在着心理健康危机,特别是在年轻人中。尽管许多年轻人生活在城市环境中,但关于接触绿色或自然环境与心理健康之间关系的评论往往集中在儿童或成人身上。本综述的目的是研究这一年龄组的全球文献范围,为14-24岁年轻人接触绿地在预防焦虑和抑郁方面的作用提供系统综述。设计/方法/方法检索了2000年1月至2020年6月发表的7个数据库的定量和定性资料。这里描述了鉴定出的201个源及其特征。文献中的空白也被强调。研究结果随着时间的推移,每年发表的相关研究数量不断增加。大多数研究都在北美(28%)或欧洲(39%)进行。最常见的研究设计是观察性(34%)或实验性(28%)。描述了广泛的暴露和干预措施。研究局限性/意义本综述纳入了主要来自高收入国家的文献,并表明中低收入国家代表性不足,研究人群缺乏种族多样性。它还强调了缺乏将焦虑和抑郁作为结果的临床衡量标准。原创性/价值这一跨学科综述通过描述文献的地理分布和被报道的绿地暴露的广泛范围,对该领域做出了贡献。与以往的范围审查不同,这次审查特别关注年轻人以及焦虑和抑郁的测量方法及其前兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Perinatal depression screening by health cadres in Indonesia: EPDS or Whooley? Perinatal depression screening by health cadres in Indonesia: EPDS or Whooley? A community center to mobilize public policies and human rights in mental health: “the door is always open” Editorial: International perspectives in public mental health Mental Health First Aid™ for Deaf communities: responses to a lack of national Deaf mental health service provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1