Development of offsite construction skill profile prediction models using mixed-effect regression analysis

B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat, R. Thomson
{"title":"Development of offsite construction skill profile prediction models using mixed-effect regression analysis","authors":"B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat, R. Thomson","doi":"10.1080/01446193.2023.2209667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Offsite construction (OSC) transfers onsite construction activities to factory-based processes utilising technological advancements, resulting in new and emerging skills while causing some existing skills to be changed and others to be redundant. However, there are no established methods to systematically quantify these OSC skill requirements. This paper presents OSC skill prediction models while highlighting the process of model development for future research. The aim of these models is to predict skills using a comparable measure, manhours/m2. A skill classification with six skill categories was used to analyse OSC skills. Numerical model development methods were reviewed, and mixed-effect regression modelling was selected for model development. The skills data needed for regression modelling was collected using eight case studies. Predominantly panelised and modular OSC projects were used to collect skills data. The skill prediction models were validated using further case study data and an expert forum. Comparatively, modules OSC type requires higher skill quantities than panels, for all the six skill categories analysed. Onsite and offsite skill requirements vary for different OSC types. Additionally, complex, non-linear relationships were recognised between OSC types and the utilisation of their skills. This research presents unique OSC skill prediction models that can provide early-stage advice to policymakers, project planners and manufacturers on OSC skill requirements. It also provides a novel methodology to develop predictive models for specific industry scenarios that have non-linear and complex relationships.","PeriodicalId":51389,"journal":{"name":"Construction Management and Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"820 - 839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2209667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Offsite construction (OSC) transfers onsite construction activities to factory-based processes utilising technological advancements, resulting in new and emerging skills while causing some existing skills to be changed and others to be redundant. However, there are no established methods to systematically quantify these OSC skill requirements. This paper presents OSC skill prediction models while highlighting the process of model development for future research. The aim of these models is to predict skills using a comparable measure, manhours/m2. A skill classification with six skill categories was used to analyse OSC skills. Numerical model development methods were reviewed, and mixed-effect regression modelling was selected for model development. The skills data needed for regression modelling was collected using eight case studies. Predominantly panelised and modular OSC projects were used to collect skills data. The skill prediction models were validated using further case study data and an expert forum. Comparatively, modules OSC type requires higher skill quantities than panels, for all the six skill categories analysed. Onsite and offsite skill requirements vary for different OSC types. Additionally, complex, non-linear relationships were recognised between OSC types and the utilisation of their skills. This research presents unique OSC skill prediction models that can provide early-stage advice to policymakers, project planners and manufacturers on OSC skill requirements. It also provides a novel methodology to develop predictive models for specific industry scenarios that have non-linear and complex relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用混合效应回归分析开发场外施工技能档案预测模型
摘要场外施工(OSC)利用技术进步,将现场施工活动转移到基于工厂的流程中,从而产生新的和新兴的技能,同时导致一些现有技能发生变化,其他技能变得多余。然而,没有既定的方法来系统地量化这些OSC技能要求。本文介绍了OSC技能预测模型,同时强调了模型开发过程,以供未来研究。这些模型的目的是使用一个可比的衡量标准,即工时/平方米来预测技能。使用了一个包含六个技能类别的技能分类来分析OSC技能。综述了数值模型开发方法,并选择混合效应回归模型进行模型开发。使用八个案例研究收集了回归建模所需的技能数据。主要采用小组和模块化OSC项目来收集技能数据。使用进一步的案例研究数据和专家论坛对技能预测模型进行了验证。相比之下,对于所分析的所有六个技能类别,OSC类型的模块需要比面板更高的技能数量。不同OSC类型的现场和场外技能要求各不相同。此外,OSC类型及其技能利用之间存在复杂的非线性关系。这项研究提出了独特的OSC技能预测模型,可以为决策者、项目规划者和制造商提供OSC技能需求的早期建议。它还提供了一种新的方法来开发具有非线性和复杂关系的特定行业场景的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
14.70%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Construction Management and Economics publishes high-quality original research concerning the management and economics of activity in the construction industry. Our concern is the production of the built environment. We seek to extend the concept of construction beyond on-site production to include a wide range of value-adding activities and involving coalitions of multiple actors, including clients and users, that evolve over time. We embrace the entire range of construction services provided by the architecture/engineering/construction sector, including design, procurement and through-life management. We welcome papers that demonstrate how the range of diverse academic and professional disciplines enable robust and novel theoretical, methodological and/or empirical insights into the world of construction. Ultimately, our aim is to inform and advance academic debates in the various disciplines that converge on the construction sector as a topic of research. While we expect papers to have strong theoretical positioning, we also seek contributions that offer critical, reflexive accounts on practice. Construction Management & Economics now publishes the following article types: -Research Papers -Notes - offering a comment on a previously published paper or report a new idea, empirical finding or approach. -Book Reviews -Letters - terse, scholarly comments on any aspect of interest to our readership. Commentaries -Obituaries - welcome in relation to significant figures in our field.
期刊最新文献
Digital platforms and the construction supply chain: trends and emerging themes in extant AEC research Bug or feature? Institutional misalignments between construction technology and venture capital Public clients pursue innovation, but what’s going on at the project level? A case study of infrastructure operation and maintenance Understanding the effect of contractual complexity on regulatory focus in construction projects: the moderating role of organizational culture Making logistics a central core in complex construction projects: a power-dependency analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1