ASSET ALLOCATION WITH ASSET-CLASS-BASED AND FACTOR-BASED RISK PARITY APPROACHES

H. Kato, Norio Hibiki
{"title":"ASSET ALLOCATION WITH ASSET-CLASS-BASED AND FACTOR-BASED RISK PARITY APPROACHES","authors":"H. Kato, Norio Hibiki","doi":"10.15807/jorsj.63.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The asset allocation strategy is important to manage assets effectively. In recent years, the risk parity strategy has become attractive to academics and practitioners. The risk parity strategy determines the allocation for asset classes in order to equalize their contributions to overall portfolio risk. Roncalli and Weisang (2016) propose the use of \\risk factors\" instead of asset classes. This approach achieves the portfolio diversi(cid:12)cation based on the decomposition of portfolio risk into risk factor contribution. The factor-based risk parity approach can diversify across the true sources of risk whereas the asset-class-based approach may lead to solutions with hidden risk concentration. However, it has some shortcomings. In our paper, we propose a methodology of constructing the well-balanced portfolio by the mixture of asset-class-based and factor-based risk parity approaches. We also propose the method of determining the weight of two approaches using the diversi(cid:12)cation index. We can construct the portfolio dynamically controlled with the weight which is adjusted in response to market environment. We examine the characteristics of the model through the numerical tests with seven global (cid:12)nancial indices and three factors. We (cid:12)nd it gives the well-balanced portfolio between asset and factor diversi(cid:12)cations. We also implement the backtest from 2005 to 2018, and the performances are measured on a USD basis. We (cid:12)nd our method decreases standard deviation of return and downside risk, and it has a higher Sharpe ratio than other portfolio strategies. These results show our new method has practical advantages.","PeriodicalId":51107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.63.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The asset allocation strategy is important to manage assets effectively. In recent years, the risk parity strategy has become attractive to academics and practitioners. The risk parity strategy determines the allocation for asset classes in order to equalize their contributions to overall portfolio risk. Roncalli and Weisang (2016) propose the use of \risk factors" instead of asset classes. This approach achieves the portfolio diversi(cid:12)cation based on the decomposition of portfolio risk into risk factor contribution. The factor-based risk parity approach can diversify across the true sources of risk whereas the asset-class-based approach may lead to solutions with hidden risk concentration. However, it has some shortcomings. In our paper, we propose a methodology of constructing the well-balanced portfolio by the mixture of asset-class-based and factor-based risk parity approaches. We also propose the method of determining the weight of two approaches using the diversi(cid:12)cation index. We can construct the portfolio dynamically controlled with the weight which is adjusted in response to market environment. We examine the characteristics of the model through the numerical tests with seven global (cid:12)nancial indices and three factors. We (cid:12)nd it gives the well-balanced portfolio between asset and factor diversi(cid:12)cations. We also implement the backtest from 2005 to 2018, and the performances are measured on a USD basis. We (cid:12)nd our method decreases standard deviation of return and downside risk, and it has a higher Sharpe ratio than other portfolio strategies. These results show our new method has practical advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于资产类别和基于因子的风险平价方法的资产配置
资产配置策略对于有效管理资产非常重要。近年来,风险均等战略对学者和从业者具有吸引力。风险平价策略决定了资产类别的分配,以均衡其对整体投资组合风险的贡献。Roncalli和Weisang(2016)提出使用“风险因素”来代替资产类别。这种方法实现了投资组合的多样化(cid:12)阳离子是基于将投资组合风险分解为风险因素的贡献。基于因素的风险平价方法可以使真正的风险来源多样化,而基于资产类别的方法可能会导致隐藏风险集中的解决方案。然而,它也有一些缺点。在我们的论文中,我们提出了一种通过混合基于资产类别和基于因素的风险平价方法来构建均衡投资组合的方法。我们还提出了使用diversity(cid:12)阳离子指数来确定两种方法的权重的方法。我们可以构建动态控制的投资组合,并根据市场环境调整权重。我们通过对7个全球(cid:12)金融指数和3个因素的数值测试来检验该模型的特征。我们(cid:12)发现,它给出了资产和要素多样化(cid:12)之间的均衡投资组合。我们还实施了2005年至2018年的回溯测试,性能以美元为基础进行衡量。我们(cid:12)和我们的方法降低了回报和下行风险的标准差,并且它比其他投资组合策略具有更高的夏普比率。这些结果表明我们的新方法具有实用优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan
Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original work and quality reviews in the field of operations research and management science to OR practitioners and researchers in two substantive categories: operations research methods; applications and practices of operations research in industry, public sector, and all areas of science and engineering.
期刊最新文献
IMPLEMENTING ARROW–DEBREU EQUILIBRIA IN APPROXIMATELY COMPLETE SECURITY MARKETS A RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRICAL APPROACH TO STRICTLY CONVEX QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING WITH CONVEXITY-PRESERVING METRIC PARAMETERIZATION A SUBGEOMETRIC CONVERGENCE FORMULA FOR TOTAL-VARIATION ERROR OF THE LEVEL-INCREMENT TRUNCATION APPROXIMATION OF M/G/1-TYPE MARKOV CHAINS MIXED-INTEGER DC PROGRAMMING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR THE CIRCULAR PACKING PROBLEM A HYBRID ALGORITHM FOR THE ADWORDS PROBLEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1