A deep learning-based comparative study to track mental depression from EEG data

Avik Sarkar , Ankita Singh , Rakhi Chakraborty
{"title":"A deep learning-based comparative study to track mental depression from EEG data","authors":"Avik Sarkar ,&nbsp;Ankita Singh ,&nbsp;Rakhi Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Modern day's society is engaged in commitment-based and time-bound jobs. This invites tension and mental depression among many people who are not able to cope up with this type of working environment. Cases of mental depression are increasing day by day all over the world. Recently, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has added further fuel to the fire. In many countries, the ratio between patients with mental depression and psychiatrists or psychologists is remarkably poor. Under such a situation, the design, and development of an expert system by exploiting the hidden power of various deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques can solve the problem up to a greater extent.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Each deep learning and machine learning technique has got its advantages and disadvantages to handle different classification problems. In this article four neural network-based deep learning architectures namely MLP, CNN, RNN, RNN with LSTM, and two Supervised Machine Learning Techniques such as SVM and LR are implemented to investigate and compare their suitability to track the mental depression from EEG Data.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Among Neural Network-Based Deep Learning techniques RNN model has achieved the highest accuracy with 97.50% in Training Set and 96.50% in the Testing set respectively. It has been followed with RNN with LSTM model when there were 40% data in the Testing Set. Whereas both the Supervised Machine Learning Models namely SVM and LR have outperformed with 100.00% accuracies in Training Phase and approximately 97.25% accuracies in Testing Phase respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This investigation and comparison-oriented study establish the suitability of RNN, RNN with LSTM, SVM and LR model to track mental depression from EEG data. This type of comparative research using Machine Learning and Deep learning architectures must be framed out on this topic to finalize the design and development of an expert system for the automatic detection of depression from EEG data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000012/pdfft?md5=ab917b6cf18cc9299bcccef61a873e6d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528622000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Background

Modern day's society is engaged in commitment-based and time-bound jobs. This invites tension and mental depression among many people who are not able to cope up with this type of working environment. Cases of mental depression are increasing day by day all over the world. Recently, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has added further fuel to the fire. In many countries, the ratio between patients with mental depression and psychiatrists or psychologists is remarkably poor. Under such a situation, the design, and development of an expert system by exploiting the hidden power of various deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques can solve the problem up to a greater extent.

Methodology

Each deep learning and machine learning technique has got its advantages and disadvantages to handle different classification problems. In this article four neural network-based deep learning architectures namely MLP, CNN, RNN, RNN with LSTM, and two Supervised Machine Learning Techniques such as SVM and LR are implemented to investigate and compare their suitability to track the mental depression from EEG Data.

Result

Among Neural Network-Based Deep Learning techniques RNN model has achieved the highest accuracy with 97.50% in Training Set and 96.50% in the Testing set respectively. It has been followed with RNN with LSTM model when there were 40% data in the Testing Set. Whereas both the Supervised Machine Learning Models namely SVM and LR have outperformed with 100.00% accuracies in Training Phase and approximately 97.25% accuracies in Testing Phase respectively.

Conclusion

This investigation and comparison-oriented study establish the suitability of RNN, RNN with LSTM, SVM and LR model to track mental depression from EEG data. This type of comparative research using Machine Learning and Deep learning architectures must be framed out on this topic to finalize the design and development of an expert system for the automatic detection of depression from EEG data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的脑电数据跟踪精神抑郁的比较研究
现代社会从事的是基于承诺和有时间限制的工作。这让许多无法应付这种工作环境的人感到紧张和精神抑郁。世界各地的精神抑郁症病例日益增多。最近,2019冠状病毒病大流行的爆发更是火上浇油。在许多国家,精神抑郁症患者与精神病医生或心理学家之间的比例非常低。在这种情况下,利用各种深度学习(DL)和机器学习(ML)技术的隐藏力量来设计和开发专家系统可以在更大程度上解决问题。每种深度学习和机器学习技术在处理不同的分类问题时都有其优缺点。本文采用了四种基于神经网络的深度学习架构,即MLP、CNN、RNN、RNN与LSTM,以及两种监督式机器学习技术,如SVM和LR,来研究和比较它们在脑电数据中跟踪精神抑郁的适用性。结果在基于神经网络的深度学习技术中,RNN模型在训练集和测试集的准确率分别达到97.50%和96.50%,达到最高。当测试集中的数据量达到40%时,使用LSTM模型的RNN进行测试。而监督机器学习模型,即SVM和LR在训练阶段的准确率分别为100.00%和97.25%。结论本研究以调查和比较为导向,确立了RNN、RNN结合LSTM、SVM和LR模型对脑电数据进行精神抑郁跟踪的适用性。这种使用机器学习和深度学习架构的比较研究必须在这个主题上进行,以完成从脑电图数据中自动检测抑郁症的专家系统的设计和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in neurodegenerative diseases Topic modeling of neuropsychiatric diseases related to gut microbiota and gut brain axis using artificial intelligence based BERTopic model on PubMed abstracts Brain network analysis in Parkinson's disease patients based on graph theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1