Extraterritoriality in East Asia: Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction in China, Japan, and South Korea edited by Danielle IRELAND-PIPER. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. 168 pp. Hardcover: £75.00; eBook: £25.00. doi:10.4337/9781788976664

Lucia Leontiev
{"title":"Extraterritoriality in East Asia: Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction in China, Japan, and South Korea edited by Danielle IRELAND-PIPER. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. 168 pp. Hardcover: £75.00; eBook: £25.00. doi:10.4337/9781788976664","authors":"Lucia Leontiev","doi":"10.1017/S2044251323000206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"foreign aircraft in international airspace adjacent to their coasts. Stewart hints that three significant events sparked her research; namely, China’s opposition to the United States aircraft flying in international airspace in the South China Sea over its artificial islands; the Gulf states’ ban on Qatari-registered aircraft entering international airspace within their FIRs; and China’s adoption of an ADIZ with several features that resulted in pushback from other states. Chapter 4 of the book, with its focus on FIR and ADIZ, is a significant contribution since in-depth analyses on those topics are surprisingly rare. One possible criticism is that, instead of having FIR and ADIZ in the same chapter, addressing them in two separate chapters could have clarified the point. As Stewart explains, FIR has its basis in international civil aviation law (namely, the Chicago Convention of 1944), while ADIZ has no foundation in international law. The book’s biggest strength is the author’s intimate knowledge of air law and the law of the sea. Through an integrated examination of these two specialized fields of international law, she effectively presents the “ambiguity in international law in terms of where the balance sits between the rights of the coastal state and the rights of the users of the airspace in the exercise of their freedom of overflight” (p. 241). To alleviate fragmentation of the law governing the use of international airspace, she calls for closer cooperation between the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO), such as by issuing joint guidance on the text of the treaty. ICAO and IMO had already done something similar when they published the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual. While emphasizing that freedom of overflight is a fundamental principle in international airspace, Stewart firmly concludes that the international community must closely scrutinize the practices of coastal states as to their legitimacy under relevant international law. This book is particularly helpful in understanding relevant international laws and state practices in international airspace.","PeriodicalId":43342,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of International Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"412 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

foreign aircraft in international airspace adjacent to their coasts. Stewart hints that three significant events sparked her research; namely, China’s opposition to the United States aircraft flying in international airspace in the South China Sea over its artificial islands; the Gulf states’ ban on Qatari-registered aircraft entering international airspace within their FIRs; and China’s adoption of an ADIZ with several features that resulted in pushback from other states. Chapter 4 of the book, with its focus on FIR and ADIZ, is a significant contribution since in-depth analyses on those topics are surprisingly rare. One possible criticism is that, instead of having FIR and ADIZ in the same chapter, addressing them in two separate chapters could have clarified the point. As Stewart explains, FIR has its basis in international civil aviation law (namely, the Chicago Convention of 1944), while ADIZ has no foundation in international law. The book’s biggest strength is the author’s intimate knowledge of air law and the law of the sea. Through an integrated examination of these two specialized fields of international law, she effectively presents the “ambiguity in international law in terms of where the balance sits between the rights of the coastal state and the rights of the users of the airspace in the exercise of their freedom of overflight” (p. 241). To alleviate fragmentation of the law governing the use of international airspace, she calls for closer cooperation between the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO), such as by issuing joint guidance on the text of the treaty. ICAO and IMO had already done something similar when they published the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual. While emphasizing that freedom of overflight is a fundamental principle in international airspace, Stewart firmly concludes that the international community must closely scrutinize the practices of coastal states as to their legitimacy under relevant international law. This book is particularly helpful in understanding relevant international laws and state practices in international airspace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《东亚治外法权:中国、日本和韩国的治外刑事管辖权》,Danielle IRELAND-PIPER主编。英国切尔滕纳姆/马萨诸塞州北安普敦:爱德华·埃尔加出版社,2021年。168页,精装本:75.00英镑;电子书:25.00英镑。doi:10.4337/9781788976664
外国飞机进入其海岸附近的国际空域。斯图尔特暗示,有三个重要事件激发了她的研究;即中国反对美国飞机在南海国际空域飞越中国的人工岛屿;海湾国家禁止卡塔尔注册的飞机在其第一机场内进入国际空域;中国划设的防空识别区有几个特征,导致其他国家的抵制。本书的第4章关注FIR和ADIZ,这是一个重要的贡献,因为对这些主题的深入分析非常罕见。一种可能的批评是,与其将FIR和ADIZ放在同一章中,不如在两个单独的章节中讨论它们,这样可以澄清问题。正如Stewart解释的那样,FIR有其国际民用航空法基础(即1944年的《芝加哥公约》),而防空识别区没有国际法基础。这本书最大的优点是作者对航空法和海洋法的深入了解。通过对这两个国际法专门领域的综合考察,她有效地提出了“国际法在沿海国的权利和空域使用者行使飞越自由的权利之间的平衡位置方面的模糊性”(第241页)。为了减轻管理国际空域使用的法律的支离破碎,她呼吁国际民用航空组织(民航组织)和国际海事组织(海事组织)之间进行更密切的合作,例如发布关于条约案文的联合指导。民航组织和海事组织在出版《国际航空和海上搜救手册》时已经做了类似的事情。在强调飞越自由是国际空域的基本原则的同时,斯图尔特坚定地得出结论,国际社会必须密切审查沿岸国的做法,以确定其在相关国际法下的合法性。这本书对理解有关的国际法和国家在国际空域的做法特别有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
C.H. Alexandrowicz's India and the Kautilyan Moment Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Exploring Originality and Ownership in a Digital Landscape Pragmatic Monism: The Practice of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Engaging with International Law Conceptual (Re)Constructions of International Law edited by Kostiantyn GORBETS, Andreas HADJIGEORGIOU, and Pauline WESTERMAN. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. x + 260 pp. Hardcover: AUD $185.55; eBook: AUD $49.08. doi: 10.4337/9781800373006
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1