Narrative as Social Action: Making Rhetorical Narrative Theory Accountable to Context

IF 0.8 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE POETICS TODAY Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1215/03335372-9780389
Katra A. Byram
{"title":"Narrative as Social Action: Making Rhetorical Narrative Theory Accountable to Context","authors":"Katra A. Byram","doi":"10.1215/03335372-9780389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current reckoning with systemic bias and discrimination calls for centering historical and social context in narrative theory, as in other domains of academic and public life. This article undertakes that centering in rhetorical narrative theory. Informed by genre theory, it argues for theorizing narrative occasion by focusing on two dimensions: 1) the social positions it entails and 2) the conceptual frameworks it engages. Readings of two German-language texts, Goethe's Sorrows of Young Werther (1774/1787) and Babak Ghassim and Usama Elyas's “Behind Us, My Country” (2015), establish continua for mapping these social positions and conceptual frameworks and for evaluating their thematic salience in the narrative. Crucially, these methods are applied not only to text-internal figures like narrators and characters but also to the real-world parties to narrative: authors and actual readers. In addition to providing a framework for describing narrative occasion, this socially attuned analysis highlights problems with rhetorical narrative theory's treatment of audience, particularly its idealization of the authorial audience. The article thus points the way toward dismantling the universal thinking embedded in other narratological categories and suggests that rhetorical and cognitive narrative theories could be combined to understand how cognitive frameworks shape narrative occasion.","PeriodicalId":46669,"journal":{"name":"POETICS TODAY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POETICS TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9780389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current reckoning with systemic bias and discrimination calls for centering historical and social context in narrative theory, as in other domains of academic and public life. This article undertakes that centering in rhetorical narrative theory. Informed by genre theory, it argues for theorizing narrative occasion by focusing on two dimensions: 1) the social positions it entails and 2) the conceptual frameworks it engages. Readings of two German-language texts, Goethe's Sorrows of Young Werther (1774/1787) and Babak Ghassim and Usama Elyas's “Behind Us, My Country” (2015), establish continua for mapping these social positions and conceptual frameworks and for evaluating their thematic salience in the narrative. Crucially, these methods are applied not only to text-internal figures like narrators and characters but also to the real-world parties to narrative: authors and actual readers. In addition to providing a framework for describing narrative occasion, this socially attuned analysis highlights problems with rhetorical narrative theory's treatment of audience, particularly its idealization of the authorial audience. The article thus points the way toward dismantling the universal thinking embedded in other narratological categories and suggests that rhetorical and cognitive narrative theories could be combined to understand how cognitive frameworks shape narrative occasion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为社会行动的叙事:使修辞叙事理论对语境负责
当前对系统性偏见和歧视的清算要求在叙事理论中以历史和社会背景为中心,就像在学术和公共生活的其他领域一样。本文以修辞叙事理论为中心进行研究。在体裁理论的指导下,它通过关注两个维度来论证叙事场合的理论化:1)它所涉及的社会地位;2)它所涉及的概念框架。阅读两个德语文本,歌德的《少年维特的悲伤》(1774/1787)和巴巴克·加西姆和乌萨马·埃利亚斯的《我们身后,我的国家》(2015),建立了映射这些社会地位和概念框架的连续性,并评估它们在叙事中的主题突出性。至关重要的是,这些方法不仅适用于文本内部的人物,如叙述者和人物,也适用于现实世界的叙述者:作者和实际读者。除了提供一个描述叙事场合的框架外,这一社会协调的分析突出了修辞叙事理论对受众的处理问题,特别是它对作者受众的理想化。因此,本文指出了拆除嵌入在其他叙事学范畴中的普遍思维的途径,并建议将修辞和认知叙事理论结合起来,以理解认知框架如何塑造叙事场合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POETICS TODAY
POETICS TODAY LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication Poetics Today brings together scholars from throughout the world who are concerned with developing systematic approaches to the study of literature (e.g., semiotics and narratology) and with applying such approaches to the interpretation of literary works. Poetics Today presents a remarkable diversity of methodologies and examines a wide range of literary and critical topics. Several thematic review sections or special issues are published in each volume, and each issue contains a book review section, with article-length review essays.
期刊最新文献
Visual Hybrids and Nonconceptual Aesthetic Perception Visual Metaphors: On the Linguistic Structure of Hybrid Creatures in Art L'idée de la littérature. De l'art pour l'art aux écritures d'intervention Hybridity and the Unifying Space of Painting: Larry Abramson in Conversation with Theolonius Marx Magical Monsters: Hybrids and Witchcraft in Early Modern Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1