Getting out the Black Vote in Washington DC: A Field Experiment

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Political Marketing Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1080/15377857.2021.1939571
Jamil Scott, Melissa R. Michelson, Stephanie L. DeMora
{"title":"Getting out the Black Vote in Washington DC: A Field Experiment","authors":"Jamil Scott, Melissa R. Michelson, Stephanie L. DeMora","doi":"10.1080/15377857.2021.1939571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Scholars and practitioners have long understood the importance of mobilization for increasing voter turnout, particularly the power of personal contact to increase voter participation in low-propensity communities of color. Compared to research focused on other communities, however, less is known about how Black voters respond to encouragements to vote. This lacuna in the literature can be attributed both to the political capture of Black voters by the Democratic Party and also to rational reluctance by many in the Black community to cooperate with outside researchers seeking to experiment on their communities. Seeking to add to this literature, in the weeks leading up to the 2018 midterm elections we conducted a set of focus groups that informed a subsequent get-out-the-vote (GOTV) effort in two majority-Black wards of Washington DC. The focus group conversations generated valuable insights into the way Black residents think about politics and voting; the GOTV effort yielded negligible effects.","PeriodicalId":46259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Marketing","volume":"20 1","pages":"289 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939571","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Scholars and practitioners have long understood the importance of mobilization for increasing voter turnout, particularly the power of personal contact to increase voter participation in low-propensity communities of color. Compared to research focused on other communities, however, less is known about how Black voters respond to encouragements to vote. This lacuna in the literature can be attributed both to the political capture of Black voters by the Democratic Party and also to rational reluctance by many in the Black community to cooperate with outside researchers seeking to experiment on their communities. Seeking to add to this literature, in the weeks leading up to the 2018 midterm elections we conducted a set of focus groups that informed a subsequent get-out-the-vote (GOTV) effort in two majority-Black wards of Washington DC. The focus group conversations generated valuable insights into the way Black residents think about politics and voting; the GOTV effort yielded negligible effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在华盛顿特区获得黑人选票:一个实地实验
长期以来,学者和实践者都理解动员对提高选民投票率的重要性,特别是在低倾向的有色人种社区中,个人接触对提高选民参与度的作用。然而,与关注其他社区的研究相比,人们对黑人选民对鼓励投票的反应知之甚少。文献中的这一空白既可以归因于民主党对黑人选民的政治控制,也可以归因于黑人社区中许多人理性地不愿与寻求在其社区进行实验的外部研究人员合作。为了补充这一文献,在2018年中期选举前的几周,我们进行了一系列焦点小组讨论,为随后在华盛顿特区两个黑人占多数的选区开展的投票动员(GOTV)活动提供了信息。焦点小组对话对黑人居民思考政治和投票的方式产生了宝贵的见解;GOTV的效果可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Marketing
Journal of Political Marketing POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Marketing aims to be the leading scholarly journal examining the latest developments in the application of marketing methods to politics. As the political world becomes more complex and interwoven, it is imperative for all interested parties to stay abreast of “cutting edge” tools that are used in unique and different ways in countries around the world. The journal goes beyond the application of advertising to politics to study various strategic marketing tools such as: Voter segmentation Candidate positioning Use of multivariate statistical modeling to better understand the thinking and choices made by voters.
期刊最新文献
Democratic Malaise: A Proposed Theoretical Conceptualization for Marketing Malaise The Influences of Political Strategies and Communication Styles on Political Candidates’ Online and Offline Visibility Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election Political Campaign Professionalization in Lithuanian Elections Professionalization of Campaign Communication beyond Communication Forms. An Analysis of Poland’s Political Spots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1