Evaluating the impact of global citizenship education programmes: A synthesis of the research

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Citizenship and Social Justice Pub Date : 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1177/17461979211000039
Eman I Ahmed, A. Mohammed
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of global citizenship education programmes: A synthesis of the research","authors":"Eman I Ahmed, A. Mohammed","doi":"10.1177/17461979211000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the calls to reinforce the accountability of education programmes, this review evaluated studies that evaluated K-12 global citizenship education (GCED) programmes to assess the evidence that such programmes improved the students’ global learning. There are no current reviews assessing the impact of GCED programmes in the US. The authors conducted an electronic search in the educational databases to review the studies that addressed the impact of GCED programmes between 2000 and 2019. We reviewed the abstracts based on specific criteria: 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were rejected because they did not provide the whole information about the programmes. The final 22 studies were selected because they provided the complete description about the evaluation programme of GCED. The review examined the components and the measures of the programmes, the approaches for collecting and analyzing data. The outcomes of the evaluated programmes support the claim that these programmes succeeded in improving students’ global learning. However, our analysis revealed flaws in the studies evaluating the impact of the GCED programmes.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":"17 1","pages":"122 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17461979211000039","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Given the calls to reinforce the accountability of education programmes, this review evaluated studies that evaluated K-12 global citizenship education (GCED) programmes to assess the evidence that such programmes improved the students’ global learning. There are no current reviews assessing the impact of GCED programmes in the US. The authors conducted an electronic search in the educational databases to review the studies that addressed the impact of GCED programmes between 2000 and 2019. We reviewed the abstracts based on specific criteria: 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were rejected because they did not provide the whole information about the programmes. The final 22 studies were selected because they provided the complete description about the evaluation programme of GCED. The review examined the components and the measures of the programmes, the approaches for collecting and analyzing data. The outcomes of the evaluated programmes support the claim that these programmes succeeded in improving students’ global learning. However, our analysis revealed flaws in the studies evaluating the impact of the GCED programmes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估全球公民教育方案的影响:研究综述
鉴于加强教育计划问责制的呼声,本次审查评估了评估K-12全球公民教育(GCED)计划的研究,以评估此类计划改善学生全球学习的证据。目前还没有评估美国普通中等教育证书课程影响的审查。作者在教育数据库中进行了电子搜索,以审查2000年至2019年间针对普通中等教育文凭课程影响的研究。我们根据具体标准对摘要进行了审查:33项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究被拒绝,因为它们没有提供有关方案的全部信息。之所以选择最后22项研究,是因为它们提供了关于GCED评估计划的完整描述。审查审查了方案的组成部分和措施,以及收集和分析数据的方法。评估方案的结果支持了这样一种说法,即这些方案成功地改善了学生的全球学习。然而,我们的分析揭示了评估GCED计划影响的研究中的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Destination: Wokeness? Possibilities for exploring domestic educational travel as conscientizing praxis From influencing school food to handling hate speech: Methods, areas, and limitations of active citizenship in Finnish social studies textbooks Discerning risk-takers from avoiders: Which teachers are more likely to support teaching about the violent past in Ambon, Indonesia? Conceptualizing political information literacy among young people: A systematized review of the literature Pedagogies of generosity: Towards a multidimensional understanding that nurtures ‘critical generosity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1