Sexual Intimate Partner Violence: Effects of Prejudice toward Bisexual and Gay Men on Victim Blame

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Bisexuality Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15299716.2022.2031367
M. Brienzo, M. P. Galupo
{"title":"Sexual Intimate Partner Violence: Effects of Prejudice toward Bisexual and Gay Men on Victim Blame","authors":"M. Brienzo, M. P. Galupo","doi":"10.1080/15299716.2022.2031367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Bisexual men are one of the least studied populations within the sexual intimate partner violence (SIPV) literature, despite the prevalence of SIPV being equivalent between bisexual and gay men, and greater in bisexual than heterosexual men. Consequently, it remains unclear as to what factors contribute to SIPV–related victim blame toward bisexual men. The current study utilized a mixed–methods design to investigate prejudiced attitudes toward bisexual and gay men as predictors of victim blame in the context of SIPV. Participants (N = 124) were randomly assigned to read a vignette wherein a bisexual or gay man disclosed an experience of SIPV. Participants then completed measures of victim blame and prejudiced attitudes toward bisexual or gay men. As a means of contextualizing the quantitative analyses, participants also completed a qualitative stereotype task. Results indicated that prejudiced attitudes toward both bisexual and gay men predicted victim blame, and that victim blame attributions toward bisexual and gay men did not differ. Qualitative findings indicated that there was overlap between the stereotypes attributed to bisexual and gay men, which may explain the lack of difference in victim blame toward the two groups. These results implicate prejudice reduction and controlled stereotype processing strategies as a means of reducing victim blame attributions toward sexual minority men.","PeriodicalId":46888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bisexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bisexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2022.2031367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Bisexual men are one of the least studied populations within the sexual intimate partner violence (SIPV) literature, despite the prevalence of SIPV being equivalent between bisexual and gay men, and greater in bisexual than heterosexual men. Consequently, it remains unclear as to what factors contribute to SIPV–related victim blame toward bisexual men. The current study utilized a mixed–methods design to investigate prejudiced attitudes toward bisexual and gay men as predictors of victim blame in the context of SIPV. Participants (N = 124) were randomly assigned to read a vignette wherein a bisexual or gay man disclosed an experience of SIPV. Participants then completed measures of victim blame and prejudiced attitudes toward bisexual or gay men. As a means of contextualizing the quantitative analyses, participants also completed a qualitative stereotype task. Results indicated that prejudiced attitudes toward both bisexual and gay men predicted victim blame, and that victim blame attributions toward bisexual and gay men did not differ. Qualitative findings indicated that there was overlap between the stereotypes attributed to bisexual and gay men, which may explain the lack of difference in victim blame toward the two groups. These results implicate prejudice reduction and controlled stereotype processing strategies as a means of reducing victim blame attributions toward sexual minority men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性亲密伴侣暴力:对双性恋和同性恋男性的偏见对受害者指责的影响
在性亲密伴侣暴力(SIPV)文献中,双性恋男性是研究最少的人群之一,尽管SIPV的患病率在双性恋和男同性恋之间相当,并且双性恋男性比异性恋男性更大。因此,目前尚不清楚是什么因素导致了双性恋男性受到性传播疾病相关受害者的指责。本研究采用混合方法设计来调查在SIPV背景下,对双性恋和同性恋男性的偏见态度作为受害者责备的预测因素。参与者(N = 124)被随机分配阅读一篇小短文,其中一名双性恋或同性恋男子透露了SIPV的经历。然后,参与者完成了受害者责任和对双性恋或同性恋男性的偏见态度的测量。作为定量分析的情境化手段,参与者还完成了定性刻板印象任务。结果表明,对双性恋和男同性恋者的偏见态度预测了受害者的指责,对双性恋和男同性恋者的受害者指责归因没有差异。定性研究结果表明,双性恋和男同性恋的刻板印象之间存在重叠,这可能解释了受害者对这两个群体的指责缺乏差异。这些结果表明,减少偏见和控制刻板印象加工策略可以减少受害者对性少数群体男性的责备归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bisexuality
Journal of Bisexuality SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism
期刊最新文献
Masculine Threat and Stigma: Barriers to Help-Seeking for Gay and Bisexual Men Survivors Making the Invisible Visible: Experiences of Identity (In)Visibility in Bi + Sexual Individuals in Germany Psychometric Properties of the Bisexual Microaffirmation Scale: For Women in a Sample of Bisexual + Women and Nonbinary People of Color Development and Preliminary Validation of the Social Distance Toward Bisexual Persons Scale From Anti-Homosexuality to Gay-Friendly Festival? Festive Culture, Cultural Policies and Inclusion and Exclusion of the LGBTQIA + Collective in the Fallas of València
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1