Bond characteristics between concrete and near-surface mounted carbon fiber reinforced polymer cords

Y. Obaidat, A. Ashteyat, Ala’ Taleb Obaidat, Muna N. Abu-Lebdeh
{"title":"Bond characteristics between concrete and near-surface mounted carbon fiber reinforced polymer cords","authors":"Y. Obaidat, A. Ashteyat, Ala’ Taleb Obaidat, Muna N. Abu-Lebdeh","doi":"10.1080/24705314.2021.1950379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous studies showed that near-surface mounting (NSM) strengthening technique with rigid CFRP materials has potential advantages over the externally bonded reinforcing (EBR), therefore, it becomes efficient methodology for concrete strengthening. However, rigid NSM-CFRP cannot be wrapped around a deteriorated structural element; the need for the existence of flexible material has appeared. Therefore, in this study the flexible NSM-CFRP (cord) is investigated as strengthening technique instead of rigid NSM-CFRP. The aim of this study is to recognize the parameters affecting the bond performance of carbon fiber-reinforced concrete (CFRP) cord and concrete. These parameters are cords’ bonded length, the ratio between cord’s width and depth, concrete compressive strength, number of CFRP cords used and the distance separating cords in multi-cord specimens. Fifty-four concrete prisms were cast from 25 MPa and 50 MPa concrete compressive strengths. Thirtyeight prisms reinforced by a single cord with various cord sizes were prepared. Twelve and four specimens were reinforced with two and three cords, respectively. In the case of multi-cord specimens, a unified bond length and cord’s aspect ratio were carried out. The main parameter to be studied in this case is the cords’ separating spacing. The test results indicated that increasing (NSMCFRP) cords bonded length, concrete compressive strength, number of applied CFRP cords, the spacing between cords and reducing cords’ aspect ratio (width/depth ratio) cause an increment in the pull-out force, and then a better strengthening is achieved. Rupture was the predominant failure mode for specimens with the same bond and equal cord dimension, while debonding of the CFRP cords is the most frequent failure mode for multi-cords specimens with greater spacing.","PeriodicalId":43844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance","volume":"6 1","pages":"223 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2021.1950379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous studies showed that near-surface mounting (NSM) strengthening technique with rigid CFRP materials has potential advantages over the externally bonded reinforcing (EBR), therefore, it becomes efficient methodology for concrete strengthening. However, rigid NSM-CFRP cannot be wrapped around a deteriorated structural element; the need for the existence of flexible material has appeared. Therefore, in this study the flexible NSM-CFRP (cord) is investigated as strengthening technique instead of rigid NSM-CFRP. The aim of this study is to recognize the parameters affecting the bond performance of carbon fiber-reinforced concrete (CFRP) cord and concrete. These parameters are cords’ bonded length, the ratio between cord’s width and depth, concrete compressive strength, number of CFRP cords used and the distance separating cords in multi-cord specimens. Fifty-four concrete prisms were cast from 25 MPa and 50 MPa concrete compressive strengths. Thirtyeight prisms reinforced by a single cord with various cord sizes were prepared. Twelve and four specimens were reinforced with two and three cords, respectively. In the case of multi-cord specimens, a unified bond length and cord’s aspect ratio were carried out. The main parameter to be studied in this case is the cords’ separating spacing. The test results indicated that increasing (NSMCFRP) cords bonded length, concrete compressive strength, number of applied CFRP cords, the spacing between cords and reducing cords’ aspect ratio (width/depth ratio) cause an increment in the pull-out force, and then a better strengthening is achieved. Rupture was the predominant failure mode for specimens with the same bond and equal cord dimension, while debonding of the CFRP cords is the most frequent failure mode for multi-cords specimens with greater spacing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土和近表面安装碳纤维增强聚合物帘线之间的粘结特性
摘要先前的研究表明,刚性CFRP材料的近表面贴装加固技术比外粘结加固技术具有潜在的优势,因此,它成为混凝土加固的有效方法。然而,刚性NSM-CFRP不能包裹在退化的结构元件周围;已经出现了对柔性材料存在的需求。因此,在本研究中,柔性NSM-CFRP(帘线)代替刚性NSM-CFRF作为加固技术进行了研究。本研究的目的是识别影响碳纤维增强混凝土(CFRP)帘线与混凝土粘结性能的参数。这些参数包括帘线的粘结长度、帘线宽度与深度之比、混凝土抗压强度、使用的CFRP帘线数量以及多帘线试样中帘线的分离距离。采用25 MPa和50 MPa的混凝土抗压强度浇注54个混凝土棱柱。制备了由不同帘线尺寸的单根帘线增强的三十个棱镜。12个和4个试样分别用两根和三根绳索加固。在多帘线试样的情况下,进行了统一的粘结长度和帘线的纵横比。在这种情况下要研究的主要参数是帘线的分离间距。试验结果表明,增加(NSMCFRP)帘线的粘结长度、混凝土抗压强度、CFRP帘线的数量、帘线间距和降低帘线的纵横比(宽深比)会导致拔出力增加,从而获得更好的加固效果。对于具有相同粘结和相同帘线尺寸的试件,断裂是主要的失效模式,而对于具有较大间距的多帘线试件,CFRP帘线的脱胶是最常见的失效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Behavior and design of multi-sided composite sections Durability and fire resistance of high-performance fiber reinforced concrete with fly ash An overview of corrosion behavior and contemporary management techniques of thermomechanically treated rebars in concrete structures Long-term flexural performance of concrete beams with different pozzolanic materials: experimental and analytical study Improved removal efficiency of partial bridge deck repair patches using the saw and patch method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1