Our experience of using Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: an observational study from Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

J. Kayembe, D. Ishoso, Christian Mbongopasi, Don Jethro Mavungu, Jean René Makulo, S. Mukendi, Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro, R. J. Matangila, J. Muyembe
{"title":"Our experience of using Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: an observational study from Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo","authors":"J. Kayembe, D. Ishoso, Christian Mbongopasi, Don Jethro Mavungu, Jean René Makulo, S. Mukendi, Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro, R. J. Matangila, J. Muyembe","doi":"10.31579/2692-9406/065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Up to now COVID-19 treatment is a matter of great debate. Several trials and observational studies have brought conflicting results regarding the efficacy of some repurposed drugs suggested treating COVID-19, stressing the need for further research. Objective: This study aimed to add to the existing literature, some evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) as suggested drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Materials and Methods: This observational study reports the experience of conventional treatment (CT) combining HCQ plus AZ applied in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We compared epidemiological and clinical data between 1,100 (89%) subjects submitted to the CT and 135 (11%) who did not receive the CT. Survival analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the clinical progress at day 10 and the survival likelihood at day 15, from the treatment initiation date. Results: Clinical outcome is much better in the CT group on D10 than in the comparison group (p=0.001). The adverse effects reported are minor and equivalent in both groups (3% vs 3%). Conclusion: This preliminary observational study suggests a beneficial and safe effect of conventional treatment in our country and justifies the continuation of this therapeutic protocol at this time. However, larger analytical studies with more robust evaluation criteria are needed to strengthen the power of observations.","PeriodicalId":72392,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical research and clinical reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical research and clinical reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Up to now COVID-19 treatment is a matter of great debate. Several trials and observational studies have brought conflicting results regarding the efficacy of some repurposed drugs suggested treating COVID-19, stressing the need for further research. Objective: This study aimed to add to the existing literature, some evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) as suggested drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Materials and Methods: This observational study reports the experience of conventional treatment (CT) combining HCQ plus AZ applied in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We compared epidemiological and clinical data between 1,100 (89%) subjects submitted to the CT and 135 (11%) who did not receive the CT. Survival analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the clinical progress at day 10 and the survival likelihood at day 15, from the treatment initiation date. Results: Clinical outcome is much better in the CT group on D10 than in the comparison group (p=0.001). The adverse effects reported are minor and equivalent in both groups (3% vs 3%). Conclusion: This preliminary observational study suggests a beneficial and safe effect of conventional treatment in our country and justifies the continuation of this therapeutic protocol at this time. However, larger analytical studies with more robust evaluation criteria are needed to strengthen the power of observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们使用羟氯喹和阿奇霉素治疗COVID-19的经验:一项来自刚果民主共和国金沙萨的观察性研究
背景:到目前为止,COVID-19的治疗是一个有很大争议的问题。一些试验和观察性研究对一些用于治疗COVID-19的新用途药物的疗效得出了相互矛盾的结果,强调需要进一步研究。目的:本研究旨在在现有文献基础上补充羟氯喹(HCQ)和阿奇霉素(AZ)作为新冠肺炎推荐用药的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:本观察性研究报告了在刚果民主共和国应用HCQ + AZ联合常规治疗(CT)的经验。我们比较了1100名(89%)接受CT检查的受试者和135名(11%)未接受CT检查的受试者的流行病学和临床资料。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归等生存分析来确定自治疗开始之日起第10天的临床进展和第15天的生存可能性。结果:D10 CT组临床预后明显优于对照组(p=0.001)。两组报告的不良反应轻微且相当(3% vs 3%)。结论:这项初步的观察性研究表明,在我国,常规治疗是有益的和安全的,并证明了在这个时候继续这种治疗方案是合理的。然而,需要更大的分析研究和更健全的评价标准来加强观察的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of G6pd Deficiency on Sickle Cell Disease in Children in Kinshasa Hospitals: A Case-Control Study Why only a man turned out to be the owner of mind? Morbus Gaucher a diagnostic challenge Right Bundle Branch Block as a Form of Presentation of Acute Myocardial Infarction How and Why Macrophages are Connected with the Parkinson’s Disease: A Short Review to Develop a Therapeutic Strategy for PD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1