Mass violence, trauma, and their children

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2017.1359043
Christopher C. Taylor
{"title":"Mass violence, trauma, and their children","authors":"Christopher C. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2017.1359043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article concerns the social construction of collective memory particularly with regard to the social remembering of mass violence and trauma. How do individual memories of mass violence which are often idiosyncratic, nonverbal, and embodied coalesce and crystallize into coherent narratives shared by a group. The books reviewed here demonstrate that there are both discursive means of remembering and non-discursive means of remembering. Social memories can take narrative and textual form or they can take performative and ritual form. How does the non-discursive interact with the discursive and do these interactions depend upon varying social, political, and cultural circumstances? An encompassing theoretical issue is addressed in this literature concerning the adequacy of sociological and anthropological models in the elucidation of trauma memory vs. psychological models which place emphasis on the individual. Subsumed within this question is an inquiry into the adequacies and inadequacies of Western clinical models, such as the PTSD model, in explaining trauma due to mass violence, and the opposition frequently noted among survivors between silence and verbalization. Numerous ethnographic examples are considered in this article but particular attention is paid to the Nazi, Cambodian, and Rwandan genocides.","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"46 1","pages":"125 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2017.1359043","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1359043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article concerns the social construction of collective memory particularly with regard to the social remembering of mass violence and trauma. How do individual memories of mass violence which are often idiosyncratic, nonverbal, and embodied coalesce and crystallize into coherent narratives shared by a group. The books reviewed here demonstrate that there are both discursive means of remembering and non-discursive means of remembering. Social memories can take narrative and textual form or they can take performative and ritual form. How does the non-discursive interact with the discursive and do these interactions depend upon varying social, political, and cultural circumstances? An encompassing theoretical issue is addressed in this literature concerning the adequacy of sociological and anthropological models in the elucidation of trauma memory vs. psychological models which place emphasis on the individual. Subsumed within this question is an inquiry into the adequacies and inadequacies of Western clinical models, such as the PTSD model, in explaining trauma due to mass violence, and the opposition frequently noted among survivors between silence and verbalization. Numerous ethnographic examples are considered in this article but particular attention is paid to the Nazi, Cambodian, and Rwandan genocides.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模暴力、创伤及其子女
本文关注集体记忆的社会建构,特别是关于大规模暴力和创伤的社会记忆。集体暴力的个人记忆通常是特殊的,非语言的,具体化的,如何结合并结晶成一个群体共享的连贯叙述。这里回顾的书籍表明,有话语的记忆方式和非话语的记忆方式。社会记忆可以采取叙事和文本形式,也可以采取表演和仪式形式。非话语是如何与话语互动的,这些互动是否取决于不同的社会、政治和文化环境?关于社会学和人类学模型在阐明创伤记忆与强调个体的心理学模型中的充分性,本文献中解决了一个广泛的理论问题。这个问题包含了对西方临床模型的不足和不足的探究,比如PTSD模型,在解释大规模暴力造成的创伤时,以及在幸存者中经常注意到的沉默和语言之间的对立。本文考虑了许多人种学的例子,但特别关注纳粹、柬埔寨和卢旺达的种族灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Anthropology
Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Editor’s introduction Selected Writings of Anil Gharai: Dalit Literature from Bangla A testimony of the threat to Indian democracy: A review of Alpa Shah’s book “The Incarcerations: BK-16 and the search for democracy in India” Editor’s introduction Editor’s introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1