Building a nuclear off-ramp following the war in Ukraine

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/00963402.2022.2087383
J. Doyle
{"title":"Building a nuclear off-ramp following the war in Ukraine","authors":"J. Doyle","doi":"10.1080/00963402.2022.2087383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shattered peace in Europe, and highlighted the fundamental disagreements between Russia and NATO over the status of Ukraine and other former Soviet territories. Russia raised the stakes of this disagreement by attempting to conquer Ukraine, and threatening to use nuclear weapons if NATO intervened. NATO and the European Union must negotiate an end to the fighting and deny Russian victory over Ukraine. Once peace is achieved, European security architecture must be rebuilt. This requires improving political relations between Russia and an expanded NATO, establishing stable military-to-military relations at reduced force levels, and reliably reducing the threat of nuclear war. NATO should indicate that it is willing to remove US nuclear weapons from Europe in exchange for similar Russian reductions – and the rearward movement of Russia’s non-strategic nuclear forces. Near-term agreement on such steps can reduce the short-term threat of nuclear war, while also setting the stage for negotiations on replacing the INF treaty with a new agreement banning intermediate and short-range offensive missiles in Europe. Both sides need to re-assert that nuclear arms are weapons of last resort and pledge never to employ them first in a conflict.","PeriodicalId":46802,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists","volume":"78 1","pages":"218 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2022.2087383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shattered peace in Europe, and highlighted the fundamental disagreements between Russia and NATO over the status of Ukraine and other former Soviet territories. Russia raised the stakes of this disagreement by attempting to conquer Ukraine, and threatening to use nuclear weapons if NATO intervened. NATO and the European Union must negotiate an end to the fighting and deny Russian victory over Ukraine. Once peace is achieved, European security architecture must be rebuilt. This requires improving political relations between Russia and an expanded NATO, establishing stable military-to-military relations at reduced force levels, and reliably reducing the threat of nuclear war. NATO should indicate that it is willing to remove US nuclear weapons from Europe in exchange for similar Russian reductions – and the rearward movement of Russia’s non-strategic nuclear forces. Near-term agreement on such steps can reduce the short-term threat of nuclear war, while also setting the stage for negotiations on replacing the INF treaty with a new agreement banning intermediate and short-range offensive missiles in Europe. Both sides need to re-assert that nuclear arms are weapons of last resort and pledge never to employ them first in a conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乌克兰战争后修建一个核出口
摘要俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵破坏了欧洲的和平,并突显了俄罗斯和北约在乌克兰和其他前苏联领土地位问题上的根本分歧。俄罗斯试图征服乌克兰,并威胁说,如果北约介入,俄罗斯将使用核武器,从而增加了这一分歧的风险。北约和欧盟必须通过谈判结束战斗,并否认俄罗斯对乌克兰的胜利。一旦实现和平,就必须重建欧洲的安全架构。这需要改善俄罗斯与扩大后的北约之间的政治关系,在减少兵力的情况下建立稳定的军事关系,并可靠地减少核战争的威胁。北约应该表明,它愿意从欧洲移除美国的核武器,以换取俄罗斯的类似削减——以及俄罗斯非战略核力量的向后移动。就这些步骤达成的短期协议可以减少核战争的短期威胁,同时也为用一项禁止欧洲中短程进攻性导弹的新协议取代《中导条约》的谈判奠定了基础。双方都需要重申,核武器是最后的武器,并承诺永远不会在冲突中首先使用核武器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Where climate journalism is now: Interview with Emily Atkin, the fire behind the Heated climate newsletter Climate anxiety is not a mental health problem. But we should still treat it as one Book excerpt—Catastrophic climate change: Lessons from the dinosaurs Introduction: Climate change—where are we now? Redefining the wildfire problem and scaling solutions to meet the challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1