The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2021-03-27 DOI:10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024
M. Salomon
{"title":"The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer","authors":"M. Salomon","doi":"10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article questions the use of international human rights law in realising social transformation. It studies the new United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, drawing on the commodity-form theory of law. Through this lens, foregrounding the relationship between capitalism and law and their shared constituent form, the contradiction in what is at times a radical normative project in international human rights law is revealed. With the unintended consequences of human rights lawyering made visible, this work turns to the means through which the advocate can launch a potentially transformative ‘legal’ strategy. An exploration of two seminal modes of reconciliation follows: reconciling the use of international human rights law with a commitment to social transformation and reconciling the post-capitalist politics of progressive lawyers with their use of the law.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":"8 1","pages":"425-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LRIL/LRAA024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article questions the use of international human rights law in realising social transformation. It studies the new United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, drawing on the commodity-form theory of law. Through this lens, foregrounding the relationship between capitalism and law and their shared constituent form, the contradiction in what is at times a radical normative project in international human rights law is revealed. With the unintended consequences of human rights lawyering made visible, this work turns to the means through which the advocate can launch a potentially transformative ‘legal’ strategy. An exploration of two seminal modes of reconciliation follows: reconciling the use of international human rights law with a commitment to social transformation and reconciling the post-capitalist politics of progressive lawyers with their use of the law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农民的激进思想、国际人权法的“伪激进主义”与革命律师
本文质疑国际人权法在实现社会转型中的作用。它借鉴了法律的商品形式理论,研究了新的《联合国农民和其他农村劳动者权利宣言》。通过这个镜头,突出了资本主义与法律之间的关系及其共同的构成形式,揭示了国际人权法中有时是激进规范项目的矛盾。随着人权律师的意外后果显而易见,这项工作转向了倡导者发起潜在变革性“法律”战略的手段。以下是对两种开创性和解模式的探索:将国际人权法的使用与对社会转型的承诺相调和,以及将进步律师的后资本主义政治与他们对法律的使用相调和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Tracking the civilising mission’s continuities in externalised migration controls: a critical analysis of EU cooperation with third countries ‘Nowhere home’ Is critique part of the practice of international law? Ethical challenges of using trial transcripts for research purposes: A case study of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia International law as shibboleth: the continued appeal of heroic narratives in support of military intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1