Color in the Court: Using the Racial and Ethnic Disparities (RED) Program Assessment Tool to Promote Equitable and Inclusive Treatment Court Practice

IF 0.6 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1080/07347324.2023.2173037
J. Gallagher, Preeti Menon, Zephi Francis, M. Collinson, Peace Odili
{"title":"Color in the Court: Using the Racial and Ethnic Disparities (RED) Program Assessment Tool to Promote Equitable and Inclusive Treatment Court Practice","authors":"J. Gallagher, Preeti Menon, Zephi Francis, M. Collinson, Peace Odili","doi":"10.1080/07347324.2023.2173037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Treatment courts have been part of the criminal justice system for nearly three-and-a-half decades. The first treatment court, an adult drug court, began in 1989 in Florida, and due to the success of drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism rates, the intervention has evolved to address other problems and populations, such as veterans treatment courts (VTCs) and family treatment courts (FTCs). Treatment courts have been credited with promoting criminal justice reform, as they offer a rehabilitative approach to justice, as compared to historical punitive models. Research, however, has consistently shown that racial and ethnic minorities have lower completion rates in some treatment courts than their white counterparts. This study is the first statewide evaluation to use the Racial and Ethnic Disparities (RED) Program Assessment Tool to assess for racial and ethnic disparities in programming across several types of treatment courts (n = 30). Results showed that 64.9% of white participants completed treatment court, whereas all other races had completion rates less than 30.0%. Implications for treatment court practice are discussed in reference to staff training, the quality of treatment participants receive for substance use and mental health disorders, future research, and other key components of the treatment court model.","PeriodicalId":45949,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly","volume":"41 1","pages":"149 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2023.2173037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Treatment courts have been part of the criminal justice system for nearly three-and-a-half decades. The first treatment court, an adult drug court, began in 1989 in Florida, and due to the success of drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism rates, the intervention has evolved to address other problems and populations, such as veterans treatment courts (VTCs) and family treatment courts (FTCs). Treatment courts have been credited with promoting criminal justice reform, as they offer a rehabilitative approach to justice, as compared to historical punitive models. Research, however, has consistently shown that racial and ethnic minorities have lower completion rates in some treatment courts than their white counterparts. This study is the first statewide evaluation to use the Racial and Ethnic Disparities (RED) Program Assessment Tool to assess for racial and ethnic disparities in programming across several types of treatment courts (n = 30). Results showed that 64.9% of white participants completed treatment court, whereas all other races had completion rates less than 30.0%. Implications for treatment court practice are discussed in reference to staff training, the quality of treatment participants receive for substance use and mental health disorders, future research, and other key components of the treatment court model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法庭上的色彩:利用种族和民族差异(RED)计划评估工具促进公平和包容的待遇法庭实践
近35年来,治疗法庭一直是刑事司法系统的一部分。第一个治疗法庭,一个成人毒品法庭,于1989年在佛罗里达州开始,由于毒品法庭在降低犯罪累犯率方面取得了成功,干预措施已经发展到解决其他问题和人群,如退伍军人治疗法庭(VTCs)和家庭治疗法庭(FTCs)。治疗法庭被认为促进了刑事司法改革,因为与历史上的惩罚性模式相比,它们提供了一种恢复正义的方法。然而,研究一直表明,少数种族和族裔在某些治疗法庭的完成率低于白人。本研究是第一个使用种族和民族差异(RED)项目评估工具来评估跨几种类型的治疗法院(n = 30)的项目中的种族和民族差异的全州评估。结果显示,64.9%的白人参与者完成了治疗法庭,而所有其他种族的完成率低于30.0%。从工作人员培训、参与者接受药物使用和精神健康障碍治疗的质量、未来研究和治疗法庭模式的其他关键组成部分等方面讨论了对治疗法庭实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly is an exciting professional journal for clinicians working with persons who are alcoholic and their families. Designed to bridge the gap between research journals and information for the general public, it addresses the specific concerns of professional alcoholism counselors, social workers, psychologists, physicians, clergy, nurses, employee assistance professionals, and others who provide direct services to persons who are alcoholic. The journal features articles specifically related to the treatment of alcoholism, highlighting new and innovative approaches to care, describing clinical problems and solutions, and detailing practical, unique approaches to intervention and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Addiction Treatment Outcomes: Examining the Impact of an Inpatient Program for Substance Use Disorders and Concurrent Mental Distress A Pilot Study: Treatment of High Alcohol Consumption in a Novel Minipig Model of Alcohol Use Disorder. Assessing NIAAA's Definition of Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder: A Latent Class Analysis of a Heterogeneous Online Sample. The Levels of Serum Leptin and TNF-α in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease in the Alcoholic Indian Population Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex and Ventral Striatum Volumes in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1