Race, place, and power in the production of medical knowledge: Perspectives from the Greater Caribbean

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY History Compass Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1111/hic3.12694
Rana A. Hogarth
{"title":"Race, place, and power in the production of medical knowledge: Perspectives from the Greater Caribbean","authors":"Rana A. Hogarth","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past 10 years, the Greater Caribbean has emerged as an instructive historical concept for scholarly studies on slavery, race, disease, climate, commerce, and culture. During the era of Atlantic World slavery, this region spanned the Carolinas to the Caribbean, was home to racially diverse inhabitants, new diseases, flora and fauna typically not found in Europe, and climates that were equally as unfamiliar. Scholars have increasingly come to recognize this space as an ideal one for studying knowledge production about health and race. On the topic of race, in particular, the Greater Caribbean provided the context in which white commentators challenged or affirmed notions of innate racial difference through what they witnessed while living in the region. Questions about race, disease, climate and constitutions, could be posed at any locale; however, the ability to make side-by-side comparisons of how living, breathing Black and white bodies experienced sickness, treated illness, and labored in distinctive disease environments and climates was easier done in the Greater Caribbean than in Europe. Bearing that in mind, we should strive toward recognizing how knowledge about human bodies produced in Europe and the Caribbean worked in tandem to reify race. A number of scholars have made just that point, and amplified the significance of this region in contributing to the development and circulation of knowledge about race, as well as medical therapeutics, and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"19 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, the Greater Caribbean has emerged as an instructive historical concept for scholarly studies on slavery, race, disease, climate, commerce, and culture. During the era of Atlantic World slavery, this region spanned the Carolinas to the Caribbean, was home to racially diverse inhabitants, new diseases, flora and fauna typically not found in Europe, and climates that were equally as unfamiliar. Scholars have increasingly come to recognize this space as an ideal one for studying knowledge production about health and race. On the topic of race, in particular, the Greater Caribbean provided the context in which white commentators challenged or affirmed notions of innate racial difference through what they witnessed while living in the region. Questions about race, disease, climate and constitutions, could be posed at any locale; however, the ability to make side-by-side comparisons of how living, breathing Black and white bodies experienced sickness, treated illness, and labored in distinctive disease environments and climates was easier done in the Greater Caribbean than in Europe. Bearing that in mind, we should strive toward recognizing how knowledge about human bodies produced in Europe and the Caribbean worked in tandem to reify race. A number of scholars have made just that point, and amplified the significance of this region in contributing to the development and circulation of knowledge about race, as well as medical therapeutics, and disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学知识生产中的种族、地域和权力:来自大加勒比地区的视角
在过去十年中,大加勒比地区已成为对奴隶制、种族、疾病、气候、商业和文化的学术研究具有指导意义的历史概念。在大西洋世界奴隶制时代,这个地区从卡罗来纳州一直延伸到加勒比海地区,是种族多样化的居民的家园,也是欧洲特有的新疾病、动植物的家园,气候也同样不熟悉。学者们越来越多地认识到,这个空间是研究健康和种族知识生产的理想场所。关于种族问题,特别是大加勒比地区提供了一个背景,在这个背景下,白人评论员通过他们在该地区生活时所目睹的情况,挑战或肯定了先天种族差异的观念。关于种族、疾病、气候和宪法的问题,可以在任何地点提出;然而,与欧洲相比,在大加勒比地区更容易对活着的、呼吸着的黑人和白人的身体在不同的疾病环境和气候下是如何经历疾病、治疗疾病和工作的进行对比。考虑到这一点,我们应该努力认识到欧洲和加勒比地区产生的关于人体的知识是如何共同使种族具体化的。许多学者都指出了这一点,并强调了这一地区在促进有关种族、医学治疗和疾病知识的发展和传播方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History Compass
History Compass HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Landscape of Toleration: Central Europe in the Early Modern Era A Railway Carpenter in the History of Technology?: New Opportunities From Modern South Asia Issue Information ‘Temples Devoted to Cold Coffee and Hot Sex’: Coffee Bars and Youth Culture in Postwar Britain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1