Unconventional Labour: Environmental Justice and Working-class Ecology in the New South Wales Green Bans

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Studies in Social Justice Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2558
P. Bleakley
{"title":"Unconventional Labour: Environmental Justice and Working-class Ecology in the New South Wales Green Bans","authors":"P. Bleakley","doi":"10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The New South Wales union movement embraced the principles of heritage and conservationism in the 1970s through the imposing of “green bans” – a strategy wherein union members refused to work on construction projects that were a threat to the state’s natural or built environment. Led by radicals like Builders Labourers’ Federation leader Jack Mundey, the green bans were seen in several sectors as a departure from the traditional “Old Left” priorities of securing workers’ wages and conditions. Rather than a hard shift towards radicalism, this article proposes that the green bans were instead reflective of an already existing conservationist tradition in the New South Wales union movement. This reinterpretation is predicated on a content analysis of extant historical material such as contemporaneous news articles, personal memoirs, transcripts of political speeches and archival documents related to the policing of left-wing activism in the 1960s and 1970s. The results show that an existing tradition of engagement with a broad spectrum of social issues in the New South Wales union movement predates the emergence of the New Left, including the commitment to environmental justice principles that underpinned the green bans.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":"15 1","pages":"458-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The New South Wales union movement embraced the principles of heritage and conservationism in the 1970s through the imposing of “green bans” – a strategy wherein union members refused to work on construction projects that were a threat to the state’s natural or built environment. Led by radicals like Builders Labourers’ Federation leader Jack Mundey, the green bans were seen in several sectors as a departure from the traditional “Old Left” priorities of securing workers’ wages and conditions. Rather than a hard shift towards radicalism, this article proposes that the green bans were instead reflective of an already existing conservationist tradition in the New South Wales union movement. This reinterpretation is predicated on a content analysis of extant historical material such as contemporaneous news articles, personal memoirs, transcripts of political speeches and archival documents related to the policing of left-wing activism in the 1960s and 1970s. The results show that an existing tradition of engagement with a broad spectrum of social issues in the New South Wales union movement predates the emergence of the New Left, including the commitment to environmental justice principles that underpinned the green bans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非传统劳工:新南威尔士州绿岗的环境正义和工人阶级生态
20世纪70年代,新南威尔士州工会运动通过实施“绿色禁令”(一种工会成员拒绝参与对该州自然或建筑环境构成威胁的建筑项目的策略),接受了遗产和保护主义的原则。在建筑工人联合会(Builders workers’Federation)领袖杰克•蒙迪(Jack Mundey)等激进分子的领导下,绿色禁令在一些行业被视为背离了传统的“老左派”优先保障工人工资和工作条件的做法。这篇文章提出,绿色禁令并不是向激进主义的艰难转变,而是反映了新南威尔士州工会运动中已经存在的环保主义传统。这种重新解释是基于对现存历史材料的内容分析,如同时代的新闻文章、个人回忆录、政治演讲的笔录和与20世纪60年代和70年代左翼激进主义的监管有关的档案文件。结果表明,在新南威尔士州工会运动中,参与广泛社会问题的现有传统早于新左派的出现,包括对支持绿色禁令的环境正义原则的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Super Visa Program: Immigration Policy Changes and Social Injustice under the Neoliberal Governmentality in Canada Infrastructures of Harm, Communities of Knowledge and Environmental Justice Risky Others: Covid-19 Reconstitutions of Risk, Governance, and Stigmatization of Bodies Landscapes of Injustice, Landscapes of Repair (Editor's Introduction) Collective Memories and Community Interventions: Peace Building in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1