Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: a tool for muscle aging assessment: a pilot study

Sophie C. Regueme, Nora Frulio, Hervé Trillaud, Christophe Laurent, Eric Rullier, Benjamin Dallaudière, Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson
{"title":"Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: a tool for muscle aging assessment: a pilot study","authors":"Sophie C. Regueme,&nbsp;Nora Frulio,&nbsp;Hervé Trillaud,&nbsp;Christophe Laurent,&nbsp;Eric Rullier,&nbsp;Benjamin Dallaudière,&nbsp;Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson","doi":"10.1002/rco2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>CAPARFI study explored whether sonoelastographic data collected using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) system are reliable when evaluating skeletal muscles and whether the technique can detect muscle changes with aging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty young (YH; 18–30 years) and 30 old (OH; ≥70 years) healthy volunteers and 15 old patients with cancer (OP; ≥70 years) were assessed through quantitative ARFI measurements (m s<sup>−1</sup>) of the relaxed rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles, and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) test. The reliability in ARFI measurements was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient. Among-group differences in ARFI measurements and SPPB were evaluated using a global linear model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Acoustic radiation force impulse measurements demonstrated high reliability in all groups (intra-class correlation coefficient &gt; 0.82). ARFI measurements of the rectus femoris muscle were significantly lower in both the OH and OP groups than in the YH group (1.46 ± 0.12 and 1.50 ± 0.32 vs. 1.80 ± 0.35 m s<sup>−1</sup>). The ARFI measurements of the soleus muscle were significantly lower in the OP group than in the YH group (1.37 ± 0.37 vs. 1.70 ± 0.53 m s<sup>−1</sup>). No significant difference was observed for tibialis anterior muscle. Significantly lower SPPB scores were observed in the OP group (10.3 ± 1.4 out of 12) than in the YH (12.0 ± 0.0) and OH groups (11.5 ± 1.0).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated that ARFI quantitative measurements are reliable in relaxed skeletal muscle and may be reliably used to explore muscle changes with aging and/or neoplasia in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"4 2","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rco2.39","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

CAPARFI study explored whether sonoelastographic data collected using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) system are reliable when evaluating skeletal muscles and whether the technique can detect muscle changes with aging.

Methods

Twenty young (YH; 18–30 years) and 30 old (OH; ≥70 years) healthy volunteers and 15 old patients with cancer (OP; ≥70 years) were assessed through quantitative ARFI measurements (m s−1) of the relaxed rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles, and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) test. The reliability in ARFI measurements was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient. Among-group differences in ARFI measurements and SPPB were evaluated using a global linear model.

Results

Acoustic radiation force impulse measurements demonstrated high reliability in all groups (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.82). ARFI measurements of the rectus femoris muscle were significantly lower in both the OH and OP groups than in the YH group (1.46 ± 0.12 and 1.50 ± 0.32 vs. 1.80 ± 0.35 m s−1). The ARFI measurements of the soleus muscle were significantly lower in the OP group than in the YH group (1.37 ± 0.37 vs. 1.70 ± 0.53 m s−1). No significant difference was observed for tibialis anterior muscle. Significantly lower SPPB scores were observed in the OP group (10.3 ± 1.4 out of 12) than in the YH (12.0 ± 0.0) and OH groups (11.5 ± 1.0).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that ARFI quantitative measurements are reliable in relaxed skeletal muscle and may be reliably used to explore muscle changes with aging and/or neoplasia in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声辐射力冲击弹性成像:肌肉老化评估的工具:一项初步研究
CAPARFI研究探讨了使用声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)系统收集的声弹性图数据在评估骨骼肌时是否可靠,以及该技术是否可以检测随年龄增长的肌肉变化。方法20例青年(YH;18-30岁)和30岁(OH;≥70岁)健康志愿者和15例老年癌症患者(OP;≥70岁)通过定量ARFI测量(m s−1)放松的股直肌、胫骨前肌和比目鱼肌,以及短物理性能电池(SPPB)测试进行评估。用类内相关系数评价ARFI测量的可靠性。使用全局线性模型评估ARFI测量和SPPB的组间差异。结果声辐射力脉冲测量结果在各组均具有较高的可靠性(类内相关系数>0.82)。OH和OP组的股直肌ARFI测量值明显低于YH组(1.46±0.12和1.50±0.32 vs 1.80±0.35 m s−1)。OP组比目鱼肌ARFI测量值明显低于YH组(1.37±0.37 vs 1.70±0.53 m s−1)。胫骨前肌无显著性差异。OP组SPPB评分(10.3±1.4分)明显低于YH组(12.0±0.0分)和OH组(11.5±1.0分)。结论本研究表明,ARFI定量测量在松弛的骨骼肌中是可靠的,可以在临床实践中可靠地用于探索衰老和/或肿瘤引起的肌肉变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Computed Tomography Derived Muscle Cross-Sectional Area With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Derived Whole-Body Muscle Mass in COVID-19 Survivors Association of Sarcopenia With Phase Angle and Urinary Titin Fragment in Patients With Gastrointestinal Malignancies Effect of Stretching on Skeletal Muscle Fibrosis in Sarcopenia Velocity-Based-Training Induces Positive Changes in Muscle Morphology in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study A Novel Mouse Model Recapitulating the Clinical Progression of Cancer Cachexia Induced by Renal Carcinoma Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1