Saliva as Alternative Specimen for Measuring Inflammatory Markers Interleukins (IL10, IL-4, and IL-1β) in Association with Disease Severity among COVID-19 Patients

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International Journal of Biomedicine Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.21103/article13(2)_oa6
S. M. Ahmed, Tariq E. Elmissbah, Ammar Bayoumi, M. Ibrahim, E. Elshibli, A. Abbas, Sannaa M A Osman
{"title":"Saliva as Alternative Specimen for Measuring Inflammatory Markers Interleukins (IL10, IL-4, and IL-1β) in Association with Disease Severity among COVID-19 Patients","authors":"S. M. Ahmed, Tariq E. Elmissbah, Ammar Bayoumi, M. Ibrahim, E. Elshibli, A. Abbas, Sannaa M A Osman","doi":"10.21103/article13(2)_oa6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Saliva is a specimen that is easily collected by non-invasive means and does not require well-trained staff; it could be helpful in measuring inflammatory markers to determine COVID-19 severity. The aim of this study was to investigate saliva as an alternative specimen for measuring inflammatory markers IL-10, IL-4, and IL-1β among COVID-19 patients in relation to disease severity. Methods and Results: This cross-sectional study was conducted among COVID-19 patients in a fever clinic, isolated hotels, and hospitals providing care for positive COVID-19 patients and in public health centers for negative control patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 151 subjects participated in this study, including 101 patients with COVID-19 and 50 healthy controls. Patients with COVID-19 were categorized according to the severity of their symptoms into mild (n=50) and severe cases (n=51). The salivary concentrations of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using sandwich MyBioSource ELISA Test Kits. The age of the study population ranged from 19 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 43.3±13.0 years. The distribution of the study population showed that more of the patients were men (65[64.4%]) than women (36[35.6%]) (P=0.004). The frequency of severe infection in men was higher than in women (35[68.6%] and 16[31.4%], respectively, P=0.008). The group of severe cases was significantly older than the group of mild cases (47.9±11.03 years and 38.64±13.82 years, respectively, P=0.0007). The volume of saliva was the smallest in severe COVID-19, compared to mild cases and controls (P=0.0000 in all cases). The salivary levels of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-1β were greater in the severe cases than in mild cases and controls (46.14±11.61 pg/mL, 12.86±1.99 pg/mL, and 27.45±11.47 pg/mL versus 19.31±5.72 pg/mL, 7.96±2.12 pg/mL, and 6.59±1.90 pg/mL, respectively; P=0.0000 in all cases). The salivary levels of IL-4 and IL-10 in mild cases were greater than in controls (19.31±5.72 pg/mL and 7.96±2.12 pg/mL versus 15.30±4.36 pg/mL and 6.02±0.89 pg/mL, respectively; P=0.0329 and P=0.000, respectively), but salivary IL-1β levels in mild cases did not differ from controls (6.59±1.90 pg/mL vs. 6.03±2.28 pg/mL, P=0.9129). Conclusion: Saliva could be used as an alternative sample in measuring IL-10, IL-4, and IL-1β with the suggestion of using IL-10 and IL-4 as markers for predicting disease severity.","PeriodicalId":53991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21103/article13(2)_oa6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Saliva is a specimen that is easily collected by non-invasive means and does not require well-trained staff; it could be helpful in measuring inflammatory markers to determine COVID-19 severity. The aim of this study was to investigate saliva as an alternative specimen for measuring inflammatory markers IL-10, IL-4, and IL-1β among COVID-19 patients in relation to disease severity. Methods and Results: This cross-sectional study was conducted among COVID-19 patients in a fever clinic, isolated hotels, and hospitals providing care for positive COVID-19 patients and in public health centers for negative control patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 151 subjects participated in this study, including 101 patients with COVID-19 and 50 healthy controls. Patients with COVID-19 were categorized according to the severity of their symptoms into mild (n=50) and severe cases (n=51). The salivary concentrations of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using sandwich MyBioSource ELISA Test Kits. The age of the study population ranged from 19 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 43.3±13.0 years. The distribution of the study population showed that more of the patients were men (65[64.4%]) than women (36[35.6%]) (P=0.004). The frequency of severe infection in men was higher than in women (35[68.6%] and 16[31.4%], respectively, P=0.008). The group of severe cases was significantly older than the group of mild cases (47.9±11.03 years and 38.64±13.82 years, respectively, P=0.0007). The volume of saliva was the smallest in severe COVID-19, compared to mild cases and controls (P=0.0000 in all cases). The salivary levels of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-1β were greater in the severe cases than in mild cases and controls (46.14±11.61 pg/mL, 12.86±1.99 pg/mL, and 27.45±11.47 pg/mL versus 19.31±5.72 pg/mL, 7.96±2.12 pg/mL, and 6.59±1.90 pg/mL, respectively; P=0.0000 in all cases). The salivary levels of IL-4 and IL-10 in mild cases were greater than in controls (19.31±5.72 pg/mL and 7.96±2.12 pg/mL versus 15.30±4.36 pg/mL and 6.02±0.89 pg/mL, respectively; P=0.0329 and P=0.000, respectively), but salivary IL-1β levels in mild cases did not differ from controls (6.59±1.90 pg/mL vs. 6.03±2.28 pg/mL, P=0.9129). Conclusion: Saliva could be used as an alternative sample in measuring IL-10, IL-4, and IL-1β with the suggestion of using IL-10 and IL-4 as markers for predicting disease severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液作为检测炎症标志物白细胞介素(il - 10、IL-4和IL-1β)与COVID-19患者疾病严重程度相关的替代标本
背景:唾液是一种容易通过非侵入性手段采集的标本,不需要训练有素的工作人员;它可能有助于测量炎症标志物,以确定COVID-19的严重程度。本研究的目的是研究唾液作为测量COVID-19患者中炎症标志物IL-10、IL-4和IL-1β与疾病严重程度的关系的替代标本。方法和结果:本横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯吉达的发热诊所、隔离酒店和为COVID-19阳性患者提供护理的医院以及为阴性对照患者提供护理的公共卫生中心的COVID-19患者中进行。共有151名受试者参与本研究,其中101名COVID-19患者和50名健康对照。根据症状严重程度将COVID-19患者分为轻度(n=50)和重度(n=51)。采用夹心型MyBioSource ELISA试剂盒检测唾液中IL-4、IL-10和IL-1β的浓度。研究人群年龄19 ~ 70岁,平均年龄43.3±13.0岁。研究人群分布显示,男性65例(64.4%)多于女性36例(35.6%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.004)。男性重症感染发生率高于女性(分别为35例[68.6%]和16例[31.4%],P=0.008)。重症组年龄明显大于轻症组(分别为47.9±11.03岁和38.64±13.82岁,P=0.0007)。与轻症病例和对照组相比,重症COVID-19患者的唾液体积最小(所有病例P=0.0000)。重症患者唾液IL-4、IL-10、IL-1β水平高于轻症和对照组(分别为46.14±11.61 pg/mL、12.86±1.99 pg/mL、27.45±11.47 pg/mL和19.31±5.72 pg/mL、7.96±2.12 pg/mL、6.59±1.90 pg/mL);在所有情况下P=0.0000)。轻症患者唾液IL-4、IL-10水平高于对照组(分别为19.31±5.72 pg/mL、7.96±2.12 pg/mL和15.30±4.36 pg/mL、6.02±0.89 pg/mL);P=0.0329和P=0.000),但轻度患者唾液IL-1β水平与对照组无差异(6.59±1.90 pg/mL vs. 6.03±2.28 pg/mL, P=0.9129)。结论:唾液可作为检测IL-10、IL-4和IL-1β的替代样本,建议将IL-10和IL-4作为预测疾病严重程度的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomedicine
International Journal of Biomedicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute Transverse Myelitis with Right Arm Paralysis in a Pediatric Patient: A Rare and Challenging Case Report Diagnostic Reference Levels in Pediatric Cardiac CT Imaging: A Literature Review Sirenomelia (Mermaid Syndrome): A Case Report Left Ventricular Function after Revascularization in Patients with Chronical Coronary Syndromes The Immune Profile of the Endometrium in the "Uterine Factor" of Infertility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1