(De)constructing Nationalism: Understanding Irony in Thomas Mann’s Der Tod in Venedig (1912), Unordnung und frühes Leid (1925), and Mario und der Zauberer (1929)

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/09593683.2023.2212446
Helena de Guise
{"title":"(De)constructing Nationalism: Understanding Irony in Thomas Mann’s Der Tod in Venedig (1912), Unordnung und frühes Leid (1925), and Mario und der Zauberer (1929)","authors":"Helena de Guise","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2023.2212446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the background of the European era of nationalism, Thomas Mann’s Der Tod in Venedig (1912), Unordnung und frühes Leid (1925), and Mario und der Zauberer (1929) reveal the authority of narrative in the discursive construction of identity. By analysing the interrelation of Mann’s characteristic irony and productions of discourses of racialization, this essay draws attention to the constructed nature of German national identity. This identity is revealed to be underpinned by colonial tropes of difference which simultaneously structure internal European hierarchies. Yet, far from simply affirming a naturalistic or fixed hierarchy of cultural authority, irony at a narrative level elucidates how norms are both socially and textually constructed, and, by extension, unstable. In this way, troubling the distinction between cultural truths and social fictions, this essay explores the way in which the works problematize to what extent norms are, in fact, normative.","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2023.2212446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the background of the European era of nationalism, Thomas Mann’s Der Tod in Venedig (1912), Unordnung und frühes Leid (1925), and Mario und der Zauberer (1929) reveal the authority of narrative in the discursive construction of identity. By analysing the interrelation of Mann’s characteristic irony and productions of discourses of racialization, this essay draws attention to the constructed nature of German national identity. This identity is revealed to be underpinned by colonial tropes of difference which simultaneously structure internal European hierarchies. Yet, far from simply affirming a naturalistic or fixed hierarchy of cultural authority, irony at a narrative level elucidates how norms are both socially and textually constructed, and, by extension, unstable. In this way, troubling the distinction between cultural truths and social fictions, this essay explores the way in which the works problematize to what extent norms are, in fact, normative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(德)建构民族主义:解读托马斯·曼《威尼斯之死》(1912)、《混乱与早期里德》(1925)、《马里奥与巫师》(1929)中的反讽
摘要在欧洲民族主义时代的大背景下,托马斯·曼的《威尼斯的陶德》(1912)、《Unordnung und frühes Leid》(1925)和《Mario und Der Zauberer》(1929)揭示了叙事在身份话语建构中的权威性。本文通过分析曼恩特有的反讽与种族化话语的产生之间的相互关系,来引起人们对德国民族身份建构本质的关注。这种身份被揭示是由殖民地的差异比喻所支撑的,这些差异同时构成了欧洲内部的等级制度。然而,讽刺并不是简单地肯定一种自然主义或固定的文化权威等级制度,而是在叙事层面阐明了规范是如何在社会和文本上构建的,进而是不稳定的。通过这种方式,在文化真理和社会小说之间的区别问题上,本文探讨了作品在多大程度上质疑规范实际上是规范的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Publications of the English Goethe Society
Publications of the English Goethe Society LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Battle of the Statues in Berlin, 1859–71: Reflections on the Public Image and Standing of the German Classical Authors The Whirlwind of the Biosphere: On Vernadsky’s Goethean Cosmos – An Introduction to Vernadsky’s Goethe Essay Vladimir Vernadsky’s ‘Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist’: Its Prehistory and Reception Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist* ‘Gestaltenlehre ist Verwandlungslehre’: Zur ‘genetischen Methode’ als einem interdisziplinären Schlüsselkonzept Goethes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1