ESG Rating Divergence: Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.3905/jii.2021.1.113
Linda Zhang
{"title":"ESG Rating Divergence: Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder","authors":"Linda Zhang","doi":"10.3905/jii.2021.1.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investments aligned with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles are rapidly growing globally. In the exchange traded fund (ETF) industry, this gives rise to the power of ESG rating firms that have the influence to direct capital flows into ETFs tracking the indexes. This article examines the issues of substantial ESG rating divergence across rating firms, the impact on investors’ choices, and the influence on the ETF industry. The divergence appears to be the greatest in social and governance components, and is often qualitative in nature. The author found that certain economic sectors are more prone to ESG rating divergence than others. She presents a case study about two ESG ETFs that are viewed quite differently under various rating lenses, and offers suggestions to investors, advisors, and analysts on how to research ESG ETFs, given the major rating divergence. The article concludes with ways the ETF industry could improve its practices collectively to better serve investors with clarity and to sustain the growth of ESG impact investments.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2021.1.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Investments aligned with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles are rapidly growing globally. In the exchange traded fund (ETF) industry, this gives rise to the power of ESG rating firms that have the influence to direct capital flows into ETFs tracking the indexes. This article examines the issues of substantial ESG rating divergence across rating firms, the impact on investors’ choices, and the influence on the ETF industry. The divergence appears to be the greatest in social and governance components, and is often qualitative in nature. The author found that certain economic sectors are more prone to ESG rating divergence than others. She presents a case study about two ESG ETFs that are viewed quite differently under various rating lenses, and offers suggestions to investors, advisors, and analysts on how to research ESG ETFs, given the major rating divergence. The article concludes with ways the ETF industry could improve its practices collectively to better serve investors with clarity and to sustain the growth of ESG impact investments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG评级差异:美在行为人眼中
符合环境、社会和治理(ESG)原则的投资在全球范围内迅速增长。在交易所交易基金(ETF)行业,这产生了ESG评级公司的力量,这些公司有影响力将资本流入跟踪指数的ETF。本文探讨了评级公司之间ESG评级大幅差异的问题、对投资者选择的影响以及对ETF行业的影响。分歧似乎在社会和治理组成部分最大,而且往往是定性的。作者发现,某些经济部门比其他部门更容易出现ESG评级差异。她介绍了一个关于两种ESG ETF的案例研究,这两种ETF在不同的评级视角下被截然不同地看待,并就如何研究ESG ETF向投资者、顾问和分析师提供了建议,因为评级存在重大差异。文章最后提出了ETF行业可以集体改进其实践的方法,以更好地为投资者提供清晰的服务,并维持ESG影响投资的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1