Implementing a landscape approach in the Agoro‐Agu region of Uganda

Q1 Environmental Science Parks Pub Date : 2020-06-06 DOI:10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.parks-26-1jo.en
James Omoding, Gretchen Walters, Salete Carvalho
{"title":"Implementing a landscape approach in the Agoro‐Agu region of Uganda","authors":"James Omoding, Gretchen Walters, Salete Carvalho","doi":"10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.parks-26-1jo.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Landscape approaches are intended to resolve conflicts and address land and resource scarcity and competition. Often guided by 10 principles, numerous examples exist in the field but remain poorly documented. As a result, it remains difficult to learn about their implementation. This paper provides an example of the implementation of a landscape approach in a protected area landscape. We ask: How were landscape approach principles used in the implementation? What were the challenges and opportunities of using the landscape approach? We focus on the Agoro-Agu Landscape in the East Acholi area of Uganda. We find that some principles were critical for guiding the process, while others were outcomes of the landscape approach. Challenges included inadequate data, difficulties in addressing multiple planning units, limited resources to implement multi-stakeholder workshops, and politicisation of some issues. Opportunities included the mainstreaming of agreed actions into strategies and plans, increased resident capacity, conflict resolution, and clarified roles and responsibilities. Based on this example, landscape approaches may be used in future governmental projects.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.parks-26-1jo.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Landscape approaches are intended to resolve conflicts and address land and resource scarcity and competition. Often guided by 10 principles, numerous examples exist in the field but remain poorly documented. As a result, it remains difficult to learn about their implementation. This paper provides an example of the implementation of a landscape approach in a protected area landscape. We ask: How were landscape approach principles used in the implementation? What were the challenges and opportunities of using the landscape approach? We focus on the Agoro-Agu Landscape in the East Acholi area of Uganda. We find that some principles were critical for guiding the process, while others were outcomes of the landscape approach. Challenges included inadequate data, difficulties in addressing multiple planning units, limited resources to implement multi-stakeholder workshops, and politicisation of some issues. Opportunities included the mainstreaming of agreed actions into strategies and plans, increased resident capacity, conflict resolution, and clarified roles and responsibilities. Based on this example, landscape approaches may be used in future governmental projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乌干达Agoro - Agu地区实施景观方法
景观方法旨在解决冲突,解决土地和资源稀缺和竞争问题。通常以10条原则为指导,在该领域存在许多例子,但仍然缺乏记录。因此,了解它们的实现仍然很困难。本文提供了一个在保护区景观中实施景观方法的例子。我们的问题是:在实现中如何使用景观方法原则?使用景观方法的挑战和机遇是什么?我们的重点是乌干达东阿乔利地区的Agoro-Agu景观。我们发现一些原则对于指导过程至关重要,而其他原则则是景观方法的结果。面临的挑战包括数据不足、难以处理多个规划单位、实施多方利益相关者研讨会的资源有限以及一些问题的政治化。机会包括将商定的行动纳入战略和计划的主流,提高驻地能力,解决冲突,明确作用和责任。基于这个例子,景观方法可以在未来的政府项目中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parks
Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.
期刊最新文献
Clarifying ‘long-term’ for protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs): why only 25 years of ‘intent’ does not qualify The World Heritage Convention, Protected Areas and Rivers: Challenges for Representation and Implications for International Water Cooperation A crisis of moral ecology: Magar agro-pastoralism in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal The benefits of the IUCN Green List in implementing effective park management in Queensland, Australia Nudging to glory: the World Heritage Convention’s influence in conflict-prone Global South natural sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1