A narrative review of endoscopic therapies in Barrett’s esophagus

Nour Hamade, Prateek Sharma
{"title":"A narrative review of endoscopic therapies in Barrett’s esophagus","authors":"Nour Hamade, Prateek Sharma","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Endoscopic therapy has largely replaced esophagectomy in the management of neoplastic lesions [high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer] in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). This change has improved the cost of treatment and decreased patient’s morbidity while maintaining comparable efficacy to surgery. A multitude of endoscopic techniques (resective and ablative) exist to completely eradicate the Barrett’s segment. Resective modalities such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are mostly used for visible or nodular Barrett’s lesions. Ablative modalities, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and argon plasma coagulation (APC), are used to treat flat Barrett’s lesions. These resective and ablative modalities can be used alone or in combination to yield high rates of eradication. While more head to head trials are still needed to compare current modalities, the choice of technique can depend on several factors including the lesion morphology, Barrett’s segment length, the circumferential BE extent, side effect profile of treatment, availability of tools, as well as the physician’s expertise. In this review, we discuss when BE lesions can and should be treated endoscopically, provide an overview and comparison of the available endoscopic treatment modalities, updated research on upcoming technologies, and how these therapies can be positioned to treat BE in different clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Endoscopic therapy has largely replaced esophagectomy in the management of neoplastic lesions [high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer] in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). This change has improved the cost of treatment and decreased patient’s morbidity while maintaining comparable efficacy to surgery. A multitude of endoscopic techniques (resective and ablative) exist to completely eradicate the Barrett’s segment. Resective modalities such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are mostly used for visible or nodular Barrett’s lesions. Ablative modalities, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and argon plasma coagulation (APC), are used to treat flat Barrett’s lesions. These resective and ablative modalities can be used alone or in combination to yield high rates of eradication. While more head to head trials are still needed to compare current modalities, the choice of technique can depend on several factors including the lesion morphology, Barrett’s segment length, the circumferential BE extent, side effect profile of treatment, availability of tools, as well as the physician’s expertise. In this review, we discuss when BE lesions can and should be treated endoscopically, provide an overview and comparison of the available endoscopic treatment modalities, updated research on upcoming technologies, and how these therapies can be positioned to treat BE in different clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barrett食管内镜治疗的叙述性回顾
:在巴雷特食管(BE)患者的肿瘤性病变[高度发育不良(HGD)和早期癌症]的治疗中,内镜治疗在很大程度上取代了食管切除术。这一变化提高了治疗成本,降低了患者的发病率,同时保持了与手术相当的疗效。存在多种内窥镜技术(切除和消融)来完全根除巴雷特节段。内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)等切除方式主要用于可见或结节性巴雷特病变。消融方式,如射频消融(RFA)、冷冻消融和氩等离子体凝固(APC),用于治疗扁平巴雷特病变。这些切除和消融方式可以单独使用或联合使用,以产生高的根除率。虽然仍需要更多的头对头试验来比较当前的模式,但技术的选择可能取决于几个因素,包括病变形态、Barrett节段长度、周向BE范围、治疗的副作用、工具的可用性以及医生的专业知识。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了BE病变何时可以也应该进行内镜治疗,提供了可用内镜治疗模式的概述和比较,对即将到来的技术的最新研究,以及如何在不同的临床环境中定位这些疗法来治疗BE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1